Examining PT3 Projects Designed to Improve Preservice Education
368 Downloads 200 Citations 9 Comments
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
- Anderson, C. A. (1983). Computer literacy: Changes for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 6–9.
- Barron, A. E., Hogarty, K. Y., Kromrey, J. D., & Lenkway, P. (1999). An examination of the relationships between student conduct and the number of computers per student in Florida schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 98–107.
- Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 105–127.
- Boccia, J. (2003). Ready To Teach (RTT) project final report. Lowell, MA: University of Massachusetts at Lowell.
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology into a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57–72.
- Claxton, D., & Bedford, J. (2003). East Central University PT3 project annual report. Ada, OK: East Central University, School of Education and Psychology.
- Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- CognitionandTechnologyGroupatVanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- DePaepe, J. (2005). Enhancing the technological proficiencies of educators though community-based research. Ellensburg, WA: Central Washington University, College of Education and Professional Studies.
- Diggs, L, Laffey, J., Wedman, J., & Marra, R. (2001). University of Missouri PT3 project final report. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
- Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.
- Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. CrossRef
- Graham, C., Culatta, R., Pratt, M., & West, R. (2004). Redesigning the teacher education technology course to emphasize integration. Computers in the Schools, 21, 127–148. CrossRef
- Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 49–63. CrossRef
- Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: Individualized technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239–263.
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2000a). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETSS). Eugene, OR: Author.
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2000b). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETST). Eugene, OR: Author.
- Jenkins, T. (2005). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: Final performance report. Plano, TX: Collin County Community College.
- Jonas, R. (2004). The University of Mary PT3 Project final report. Bismarck, ND: The University of Mary.
- Jones, D. L., & Paolucci, R. (1999). Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 17–27.
- Krueger, K., Boboc, M., Smaldino, S., Cornish, Y., & Callahan, W. (2004). InTime impact report: What was InTime’s effectiveness and impact on faculty and preservice teachers? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 185–210.
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Lowther, D. L., Bassoppo-Moya, T., & Morrison, G. R. (1998). Moving from computer literate to technologically competent: The next educational reform. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 93–109. CrossRef
- Ludwig, M., & Booz, W. H. (2001). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.
- Ludwig, M, & Booz, W. H. (2002). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.
- Mills, S. (2003). Pittsburg State University PT3 project final report. Pittsburg, KS: Pittsburg State University.
- Millken Family Foundation (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
- Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (Eds.). (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
- National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like. Oxford, OH: Author.
- Nave, B. (2004). Boston University Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers for Technology (BUPT3): Final summative report. Boston, MA: Boston University, School of Education.
- Norris, C., Smolka, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Extracting value from research: A guide for the perplexed. Technology & Learning, 20(11), 45–48.
- Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers & technology: Making the connection Washington, DC: U.S. Congress. (ERIC Document OTA-EHR-616)
- Paige, J. R. (2004). St. Edward’s University PT3 project final report. Austin, TX: St. Edward’s University.
- Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
- Persichitte, K. A., Tharp, D. D., & Caffarella, E. P. (1997). The use of technology by schools, colleges, and departments of education: Fall, 1996. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
- Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teaching? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. CrossRef
- Resta, P. E., Petrosino, A., & Confrey, J. (2004). Inventing new strategies for integrating technology into education: Project INSITE evaluation report. Austin, TX: University of Texas–Austin.
- Salinas, S. E. (2000, April). Exploring motivational factors in technology standards integration with a preservice educator: An action research inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
- Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 83–90. CrossRef
- Snow, S. S., & Millar, D. (2003). Saginaw Valley State University PT3 Project final report. Saginaw, MI: Saginaw Valley State University.
- Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D., & Weiss, R. (2003). Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 41–56.
- Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D. & Weiss, R. (2004). Final report for Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Las Vegas, NE: University of Nevada–Las Vegas.
- Swain, C., & Dawson, K. (2003). The University of Florida Teaching and Technology Initiative (UFTTI) PT3 implementation grant final report. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida.
- Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2001). Teaching in a technology-rich classroom. Educational Leadership, 41(4), 23–31.
- United States Department of Education (USDoE) (2004). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.pt3.org
- Vetter, R., Sologuk, S., & Stammen, R. (2001). A collaborative approach for creating curriculum and instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 199–210.
- Waddoups, G. L., Wentworth, N., & Earle, R. (2004). Principles of technology integration and curriculum development: A faculty design team approach. Computers in the Schools, 21, 15–23. CrossRef
- Wakabayashi, I. (1997). From internet user to cyberspace citizen. Educom Review, 32, 46–55.
- Wang, Y. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers’ perception of the teacher’s role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Teacher Education, 35, 150–161.
- Wentworth, N., Waddoups, G. L., & Earle, R. (2004). Technology integration into a teacher education program. Computers in the Schools, 21, 1–14. CrossRef
- Examining PT3 Projects Designed to Improve Preservice Education
Volume 50, Issue 3 , pp 16-24
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links