The Representation of Health Professionals on Governing Boards of Health Care Organizations in New York City
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The Representation of Health Professionals on Governing Boards of Health Care Organizations in New York City. The heightened importance of processes and outcomes of care—including their impact on health care organizations’ (HCOs) financial health—translate into greater accountability for clinical performance on the part of HCO leaders, including their boards, during an era of health care reform. Quality and safety of care are now fiduciary responsibilities of HCO board members. The participation of health professionals on HCO governing bodies may be an asset to HCO governing boards because of their deep knowledge of clinical problems, best practices, quality indicators, and other issues related to the safety and quality of care. And yet, the sparse data that exist indicate that physicians comprise more than 20 % of the governing board members of hospitals while less than 5 % are nurses and no data exist on other health professionals. The purpose of this two-phased study is to examine health professionals’ representations on HCOs—specifically hospitals, home care agencies, nursing homes, and federally qualified health centers—in New York City. Through a survey of these organizations, phase 1 of the study found that 93 % of hospitals had physicians on their governing boards, compared with 26 % with nurses, 7 % with dentists, and 4 % with social workers or psychologists. The overrepresentation of physicians declined with the other HCOs. Only 38 % of home care agencies had physicians on their governing boards, 29 % had nurses, and 24 % had social workers. Phase 2 focused on the barriers to the appointment of health professionals to governing boards of HCOs and the strategies to address these barriers. Sixteen health care leaders in the region were interviewed in this qualitative study. Barriers included invisibility of health professionals other than physicians; concerns about “special interests”; lack of financial resources for donations to the organization; and lack of knowledge and skills with regard to board governance, especially financial matters. Strategies included developing an infrastructure for preparing and getting appointed various health professionals, mentoring, and developing a personal plan of action for appointments.
- Belmont E, Halton CC, Hastings DA, Homchick RG, Morris L, Taitsman J, et al. A new quality compass: hospital boards’ increased role under the Affordable Care Act. Health Aff. 2011; 30(7): 1282–1288. CrossRef
- Cronenwett L, Dzau V. Who will provide primary care and how will they be trained? New York, NY: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation; 2010. Available at: http://www.macyfoundation.org/docs/macy_pubs/JMF_PrimaryCare_Monograph.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2012.
- The Joint Commission. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace: Joint Commission Resources, Inc; 2012.
- Conditions of Participation for hospitals. (2010). 42 CFR. Sec 482.12 Available at: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2004/octqtr/pdf/42cfr482.12.pdf
- Callender AN, Hastings DA, Hemsley MC, Morris L, Peregrine MW. Corporate responsibility and health care quality: a resource for health care boards of directors. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. Available at; http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/complianceguidance/CorporateResponsibilityFinal%209-4-07.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2012.
- Health Research and Educational Trust. Building an Exceptional Board: Effective Practices for Health Care Governance. Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Health Care Governance. Chicago: Center for Healthcare Governance; 2007; p. 13. Available at: http://www.americangovernance.com/americangovernance/BRP/files/BRP_final.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2012.
- Prybil L, Levey S, Peterson R, Heinrich D, Brezinski P, Zamba G, et al. Governance in high-performing community health systems: a report on Trustee and CEO views. Chicago: Grant Thorton, LLP; 2009.
- Prybil L, Levey S, Peterson R, Heinrich D, Brezinski P, Zamba G, et al. Governance in high-performing community health systems: a report on Trustee and CEO views. Chicago: Grant Thorton, LLP; 2009: 8.
- Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010: 238.
- “Berger Commission update: 1390 hospital beds never closed.” Crain’s Health Pulse. (2010, June 14). Available at: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20100614/PULSE/100619956. Accessed 3 July 2012.
- Huberman M, Miles M. The qualitative researcher’s companion. New York: Sage; 2002.
- Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9): 1277–1288. CrossRef
- Prybil L. Engaging nurses in governing hospitals and health systems. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009; 24(1): 5–9. CrossRef
- Holland TP, Ritvo RA, Kovner AR. Improving board effectiveness. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing, Inc; 1997.
- Joshi M, Hines S. Getting the board on board: engaging hospital boards in quality and safety. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006; 32(4): 179–187.
- The Representation of Health Professionals on Governing Boards of Health Care Organizations in New York City
Journal of Urban Health
Volume 90, Issue 5 , pp 888-901
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Governing boards
- Health care organizations
- Health professionals
- New York City
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Health Media and Policy, Hunter College, City University of New York, 425 E. 25th Street, Box 837, New York, NY, 10010, USA
- 2. Hunter College and City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, NY, 10010, USA
- 3. New York Univeristy Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10010, USA
- 4. Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute, Hunter College, New York, NY, 10010, USA