Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 452–466

Sexual Risk Behavior and Drug Use in Two Chicago Samples of Men Who Have Sex with Men: 1997 vs. 2002

  • Michael Fendrich
  • Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
  • Timothy P. Johnson
  • Lance M. Pollack

DOI: 10.1007/s11524-009-9432-x

Cite this article as:
Fendrich, M., Mackesy-Amiti, M.E., Johnson, T.P. et al. J Urban Health (2010) 87: 452. doi:10.1007/s11524-009-9432-x


Employing data from two Chicago-based household probability samples of men who have sex with men (MSM) implemented 5 years apart (the “UMHS 1997” and the “2002 MSM supplement” studies), we evaluated changes in risk behavior as well as the potential viability of two alternative perspectives for explaining these changes—risk management and safe-sex norm abandonment. We found significantly increased rates of unprotected insertive and receptive anal intercourse in the 2002 study. Sixty-eight percent of UMHS men reported having sex with partners having HIV positive or unknown status, compared with 38% of the MSM supplement men (p < .0001). Serosorting mediated and moderated the most extreme forms of risk behavior. Positive statistical associations between drug use and unprotected sex were stronger in the UMHS sample than in the MSM supplement. Findings suggesting that “risk management” strategies have shaped MSM behavior as it emerged in the early part of this decade have considerable implications for HIV prevention strategies.


Epidemiology HIV/AIDS Men who have sex with men Sexual behavior Substance use 

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Fendrich
    • 1
  • Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
    • 2
  • Timothy P. Johnson
    • 3
  • Lance M. Pollack
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Addiction and Behavioral Health Research, Helen Bader School of Social WelfareUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Community Outreach Intervention Projects, Division of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Survey Research Laboratory, College of Urban Planning and Public AffairsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Center for AIDS Prevention StudiesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations