Examining Differences in Types and Location of Recruitment Venues for Young Males and Females from Urban Neighborhoods: Findings from a Multi-Site HIV Prevention Study
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Finding and accessing members of youth subpopulations, such as young men who have sex with men (YMSM) of color or young females of color, for behavioral or disease surveillance or study recruitment, pose particular challenges. Venue-based sampling strategies—which hinge on where individuals congregate or “hang out” rather than where they live—appear to be effective alternatives. Methods used to identify venues focus on engaging members of social networks to learn where targeted populations congregate. However, it is not always clear if and how these methods differ according to gender, whether the youth accessed at a venue are actually from neighborhoods in which the venues are found, and whether the location of venues relative to neighborhoods of residence is different for young men and young women. This study illustrates the gender differences in venue type and venue location where eligible youth study participants from high-risk neighborhoods could be accessed for HIV research across 15 research sites (sites). The findings indicate that the study’s method led to identifying venues where one quarter or more of the youth were eligible study participants and from the high-risk neighborhoods. Sites targeting young women of color had a higher proportion of eligible study participants who were also from the high-risk neighborhoods than sites targeting YMSM. Clubs were most commonly identified by sites targeting YMSM as recruitment venues, whereas neighborhood-based service or commercial centers were more common venues for young women of color. This study reveals how venue-based recruitment strategies can be tailored and resources maximized by understanding the key differences in the types of venues preferred by males and females and by recognizing that female-preferred venues are more likely to be closer to home.
- Weir S, Tate J, Zhusupov B. Where the action is: monitoring local trends in sexual behavior. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(Suppl II):ii63–ii68. CrossRef
- Stueve A, O’Donnell L, Duran R. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922–926. CrossRef
- Amaro H, Raj A, Vego R. Racial/ethnic disparities in the HIV and substance abuse epidemics: communities responding to the need. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:434–448.
- Amaro H. Love, sex and power: considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. Am Psychol. 1995;50(6):437–447. CrossRef
- Rudy E, Newman P, Duan N. HIV vaccine acceptability among women at risk: perceived barriers and facilitators to future HIV vaccine uptake. AIDS Educ Prev. 2005;17(3):253–267. CrossRef
- Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T. Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19(suppl 2):S67–S72.
- Xia Q, Tholandi M, Osmond D. The effect of venue sampling on estimates of HIV prevalence and sexual risk behaviors in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(9):545–550. CrossRef
- Muhib F, Lin L, Stueve A, et al. A venue-based method for sampling hard-to-reach populations. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(Suppl 1):216–222. CrossRef
- MacKeller D, Valleroy L, Karon J, Lemp G, Janssen R. The young men’s survey: methods for estimating HIV seroprevalence and risk factors among young men who have sex with men. Public Health Rep. 1996;111(Suppl 1):138–144.
- Pollack L, Osmand D, Paul J. Evaluation of the center for disease control and prevention’s HIV behavioral surveillance of men who have sex with men: sampling issues. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(9):581–589. CrossRef
- Stueve A, O’Donnell, Duran R. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922–992. CrossRef
- Remafedi G. Suicidality in a venue-based sample of young men who have sex with men. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:305–310. CrossRef
- Auerswald C, Green K, Minnis A. Qualitative assessment of venues for purposive sampling of hard-to-reach youth. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(2):133–138. CrossRef
- Minnis A, Auerswald C, Doherty I. Qualitative and quantitative methods for developing a venue-based sampling approach for a study of Latino adolescents’ social and sexual networks. In: The Network Paradigm in Research on Drug Abuse, HIV, and Other Blood-Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections: New Perspectives, Approaches, and Applications. NIDA/CAMCODA Working Meeting held May 3–4, 2001. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health; September 2002.
- Weir S, Pailman C, Mahlalela X. From people to places: focusing AIDS prevention efforts where it matters most. AIDS. 2003;17:895–903. CrossRef
- Weir S, Morroni C, Coetzee N. A pilot study of a rapid assessment method to identify place for AIDS prevention in Cape Town, South Africa. Sex Trans Infect. 2002;78(Suppl 1):i106–i113. CrossRef
- Geanuracos C, Cunningham SD, Weiss G, Forte D, Henry-Reid L, Ellen JM. Using geographic information systems for HIV prevention intervention planning for high-risk youth. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1974–1981. CrossRef
- Arcury TA, Quant SA. Participant recruitment for qualitative research: a site based approach to community research in complex societies. Human Organ. 1999;58:128–133.
- Examining Differences in Types and Location of Recruitment Venues for Young Males and Females from Urban Neighborhoods: Findings from a Multi-Site HIV Prevention Study
Journal of Urban Health
Volume 86, Issue 1 , pp 31-42
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- HIV Prevention
- Venue identification
- Multi-site study
- High-risk neighborhoods
- Gender differences
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, MFL Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
- 2. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 3. Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 4. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, John H. Stroger County Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA