A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program: A Qualitative Investigation from the Perspective of Excluders and Non-Excluders
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper draws on a process evaluation of Queensland’ self-exclusion program to examine how people use the program, motivations for self-excluding, barriers to use, experiences and perceptions of program elements, and potential improvements. Detailed, reflective, first-person accounts were gathered through interviews with 103 problem gamblers, including excluders and non-excluders. Identified strengths include the program’s widespread availability. Many self-excluders reported positive experiences with responsive, knowledgeable, respectful venue staff. Major weaknesses include low publicity, limited privacy and confidentiality, the need to exclude individually from venues, and deficiencies in venue monitoring for breaches, which hinder the program’s capacity to meet harm minimisation objectives. While the program reaches some problem gamblers, others are delayed or deterred from self-excluding by low awareness, shame and embarrassment, difficulties of excluding from multiple venues, and low confidence in venue staff to maintain confidentiality and provide effective monitoring. Potential improvements include wider publicity, off-site multi-venue exclusion, and technology-assisted monitoring.
- Australasian Gaming Council. (2012). Database on Australia’s gambling industries 2011–12. Melbourne: AGC.
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2007). Self-exclusion: a proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 59–71. CrossRef
- Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. CrossRef
- Croucher, J. S., Croucher, R. F., & Leslie, J. R. (2006). Report of the pilot study on the self-exclusion program conducted by GameChange (NSW). Sydney: GameChange.
- Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Australasian gambling review (5th ed.). Adelaide: IGA.
- Dunt, D., Robinson, J., Selvarajah, S., & Pirkis, J. (2009). An independent evaluation report. Melbourne: Beyondblue, University of Melbourne.
- Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–11.
- Gainsbury, S. (2010). Self-exclusion: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Guelph: OPGRC.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
- Guest, G. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Harris, M. J. (2010). Evaluating public and community health programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Hawe, P., Degeling, D., & Hall, J. (1990). Evaluating health promotion: A health worker’s guide. Artarmon: MacLennan & Petty.
- Hing, N., & Nuske, E. (2009). Assisting problem gamblers in the gaming venue. Brisbane: QOGR.
- Hing, N., & Nuske, E. (2011). Assisting problem gamblers in the gaming venue: an assessment of practices and procedures followed by frontline hospitality staff. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 459–467. CrossRef
- Hing, N., & Nuske, E. (2012). The self-exclusion experience for problem gamblers in South Australia. Australian Social Work, 64(4), 457–473. CrossRef
- Hing, N., Nisbet, S., & Nuske, E. (2010). Assisting problem gamblers in South Australian gaming venues. Adelaide: IGA.
- Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: a longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94. CrossRef
- Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. L. T., & Riemer, F. J. (2012). Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
- Martin, N. (2009). From discrimination to social inclusion: A review of the literature on anti-stigma initiatives in mental health. Brisbane: Queensland Alliance.
- Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 129–144. CrossRef
- Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
- Nowatzki, N., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: a review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2, 3–25. CrossRef
- O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopolous, V., O’Neil, D., & Wordley, J. (2003). Part A—Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria and Part B—Summary of self-exclusion programs in Australian States and Territories. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.
- Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation. (2012). Queensland responsible gambling code of practice: Version 4. Brisbane: OLGR.
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Canberra: Productivity Commission. Report no. 50.
- Research and Statistics Unit. (2011). Report on gambling related exclusions in Queensland. Brisbane: RSU.
- Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self exclusion. Toronto: Responsible Gambling Council.
- Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Guelph: OPGRC.
- A Process Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program: A Qualitative Investigation from the Perspective of Excluders and Non-Excluders
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Volume 12, Issue 4 , pp 509-523
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Process evaluation
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Gambling Education and Research, School of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, Australia, 2480
- 2. School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia