Abstract
Working conditions for employees in the transport sector might present an opportunity structure for gambling by providing access to gambling during the workday. This study investigates connections between opportunity structure, gambling during the workday, and gambling problems among employees in the transport sector. Data has been collected from three different transport organizations in Norway: bus, truck, and taxi drivers (N = 1033). 6.8% of the sample gambled during working hours and 3.2% of the employees could be characterized as having a gambling problem. We found a positive relationship between opportunities to gamble during working hours and problem gambling, with the odds for problem gambling increasing fourteen-fold if employees gambled during working hours. Gambling during the workday is a major risk factor for gambling problems in this sample.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The helpline was set up to help problem gamblers, their families and others requiring information about problem gambling. Health Region South East RHF runs the helpline together with the Norwegian Gaming Authority. Statistics are kept on the number of callers, age and gender, type of game discussed, and game causing most problems.
To substantiate a hypothesis where the relation between A (opportunity structure) and O (problem gambling) is mediated by B (gambling in working hours), then 1) A must predict O; 2) A must predict B; 3) B must predict O; 4) the connection between A and O should disappear or decline in strength after correcting for B (Kraemer et al 2001). Whether B acts as a mediator entirely or partially depends on whether the connection between A and O disappears or is only reduced in strength after correction for B (Holmbeck, 1997).
The study is part of the Government’s Problem Gambling Action Plan. It is a three-year collaborative project between AKAN Workplace Advisory Center, Eastern Norway Center for addiction issues, and the Norwegian Gambling Authority. The study is founded by the Norwegian Directorate of Health.
Various methods were used to ensure standards were maintained during the design of the questionnaire. Focus groups and pilot interviews with employees, gamblers and therapists were used to make sure we asked the right questions, and were understood in line with intentions. Outside specialists in addiction and workplace research were used to make sure the questionnaire provided a reliable indicator of the phenomena we are interested in.
Non-Western origin means that either yourself, or both of your parents come from non-western countries.
The exception in our study would be the taxi drivers who own their own vehicles.
References
Abbott, M. (2005). Disabling the public interest: gambling strategies and policies for Britain: a comment on Orford 2005. Addiction, 10, 1233–1235. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01198.x.
Abbott, M., Volberg, R., & Rönnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal Of Gambling Studies, 20, 237–258. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040278.08853.c0.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of the mental disorders (4th ed., Rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Australian Productivity Commission (1999). Australian gambling industries. Report no. 10, Canberra: Ausinfo.
Babor, T., Caetano, R., Casswell, S., Edwards, G., Giesbrecht, N., Graham, K., et al. (2003). Alcohol: Research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blazczinsky, A. (2005). To formulate gambling policies on the premise that problem gambling is an addiction may be premature. Addiction, 10, 1230–1232. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01199.x.
Cox, J. B., Yu, N. N., Afifi, T. O., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 213–217.
Engebø, J., Gyllstrøm, F. (2008). Regulatory changes and finally a ban on existing slot machines in Norway: What’s the impact on the market and problem gambling? Presented at the 2008 International Gambling Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, February 2008.
Gerstein, D., Hoffman, J., & Larison, C. (1999). Gambling impact and behaviour study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
Griffiths, M. (1995). The role of subjective mood states in the maintenance of fruit machine gambling behavior. Journal Of Gambling Studies, 11, 123–135. doi:10.1007/BF02107111.
Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568. doi:10.1089/109493103322725333.
Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2008). Risk and protective factors relating to gambling by employees of gaming venues. International Gambling Studies, 8, 1–23. doi:10.1080/14459790701870100.
Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2006). Workplace factors that encourage and discourage gambling amongst gaming venue employees: An employee’s perspective. Gambling Research: Journal of the Natural Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 18, 7–32.
Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2005). Gambling amongst gaming venue employees: Counsellors’ perspective on risk and protective factors in the workplace. Gambling Research: Journal of the Natural Association for Gambling S, 17, 25–46.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599.
Hundeide, K. (2003). Barnas livsverden: sosiokulturelle rammer for barns utvikling. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., & Kupfer, D. (2001). How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping and proxy factors. American Journal of psychiatry, 158, 848–856.
Ladouceur, R., Boisvert, J. M., Pepin, M., Loranger, M., & Sylvian, C. (1994). Social cost of pathological gambling. Journal of gambling studies, 10, 399–409. doi:10.1007/BF02104905.
Lesieur, H. R., & Custer, R. L. (1984). Pathological gambling: Roots, phases, and treatment. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci, 474, 146–156. doi:10.1177/0002716284474001013.
Lund, I. (2007). Lessons from the grey area: A closer inspection of at-risk gambler. Journal Of Gambling Studies, 23, 409–419. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9058-4.
Lund, I., & Nordlund, S. (2003). Pengespill og pengespillproblemer i Norge. Oslo: Statens institutt for rusmiddelforskning.
Martinussen, W. (1985). Flernivåanalyser. In B. Dale, M. Jones, & W. Martinussen (Eds.), Metode på tvers. Samfunnsvitenskaplige forskningsstrategier som kombinerer metoder og analysenivåer (pp. 217–239). Trondheim: Tapir.
Martinussen, W. (1991). Sosiologisk analyse. En innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Mason, K. (2008). Does distance to gambling venues matter? Presented at the 2008 International Gambling Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, February 2008.
Norwegian Gambling Authorities. (2008a). Gaming in Norway 2005, Retrieved August 08, 2008, from http://www.lottstift.no/dav/0e11d3c4b0.pdf
Norwegian Gambling Authorities (2008b). Årsmelding 2007, Retrieved Mai 27, 2008, from http://www.lottstift.no/dav/b961e49a31.pdf
Norwegian Gambling Authorities (2008c). Samtalestatestikk 2007. Retrieved Mai 27, 2008, from http://www.lottstift.no/dav/d3cf09723d.pdf
Nower, L. (2003). Pathological gamblers in the workplace: a primer for employers. Employee Assist Q, 18, 55–72. doi:10.1300/J022v18n04_03.
Orford, J. (2005). Disabling the public interest: gambling strategies and pilicies for Britain. Addiction, 9, 1219–1225. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01143.x.
Room, R. (2005). The wheel of fortune: Cycles and reactions in gambling policies. Addiction, 10, 1226–1227. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01201.x.
Room, R., Babor, R., & Rehm, J. (2005). Alcohol and public health. Lancet, 365, 519–530.
Rønneberg, S. (2005). Steps toward responsibility. Addiction, 10, 1232–1233. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01202.x.
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. American Journal Of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.
Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., & LaPlante, D. (2004). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 40–48. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.40.
Shaffer, H. J., Vander Bilt, J., & Hall, M. N. (1999). Gambling, drinking, smoking and other health risk activities among casino employees. American Journal Of Industrial Medicine, 36, 365–378. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199909)36:3<365::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-I.
Sharpe, L., Tarrier, N., Schotte, D., & Spence, S. H. (1995). The role of automatic arousal in problem gambling. Addiction, 90, 1529–1540. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02815.x.
Statistics Norway (2007). Statistical yearbook of Norway 2007. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://www.ssb.no/english/yearbook/
Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: implications for public health. American Journal Of Public Health, 84, 237–241.
Volberg, R. A. (2002). Gambling and gambling problems in Nevada. Report to the Nevada Department of Human Resources.
Welte, J. W., Wierzorek, W. F., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2004). The relation of ecological gambling behavior and pathology. Journal Of Gambling Studies, 20, 405–423. doi:10.1007/s10899-004-4582-y.
Øren, A., & Bakken, J. (2007). Pengespill og pengespillproblem i Norge 2007. Trondheim: SINTEF Helse. Avdeling for epidemiologi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Revheim, T., Buvik, K. Opportunity Structure for Gambling and Problem Gambling Among Employees in the Transport Industry. Int J Ment Health Addiction 7, 217–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9179-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9179-8