Frontiers of Philosophy in China

, 6:345

Acting in ignorance

Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11466-011-0143-5

Cite this article as:
Dancy, J. Front. Philos. China (2011) 6: 345. doi:10.1007/s11466-011-0143-5

Abstract

This paper considers and rejects the arguments that have been given in favour of the view that one can only act for the reason that p if one knows that p. The paper contrasts it with the view I hold, which is that one can act for the reason that p even if it is not the case that p.

Keywords

knowledgereasonsactionnon-factive explanation

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA