Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 257–302

Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review

  • Zacharias C. Zacharia
  • Constantinos Manoli
  • Nikoletta Xenofontos
  • Ton de Jong
  • Margus Pedaste
  • Siswa A. N. van Riesen
  • Ellen T. Kamp
  • Mario Mäeots
  • Leo Siiman
  • Eleftheria Tsourlidaki
Development Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0

Cite this article as:
Zacharia, Z.C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N. et al. Education Tech Research Dev (2015) 63: 257. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0

Abstract

The aim of this review is to identify specific types of guidance for supporting student use of online labs, that is, virtual and remote labs, in an inquiry context. To do so, we reviewed the literature on providing guidance within computer supported inquiry learning (CoSIL) environments in science education and classified all identified guidance according to a recent taxonomy of types of guidance. In addition, we classified the types of guidance in phases of inquiry. Moreover, we examined whether the types of guidance identified for each inquiry phase were found to be effective in promoting student learning, as documented in the CoSIL research. This review identifies what types of effective guidance currently exist and can be applied in developing future CoSIL environments, especially CoSIL environments with online labs. It also highlights the needs/shortcomings of these available types of guidance. Such information is crucial for the design and development of future CoSIL environments with online labs.

Keywords

Guidance Computer Supported Learning Inquiry Process constraints Performance dashboard Prompts Heuristics Scaffolds Direct presentation of information 

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zacharias C. Zacharia
    • 1
  • Constantinos Manoli
    • 1
  • Nikoletta Xenofontos
    • 1
  • Ton de Jong
    • 2
  • Margus Pedaste
    • 3
  • Siswa A. N. van Riesen
    • 2
  • Ellen T. Kamp
    • 2
  • Mario Mäeots
    • 3
  • Leo Siiman
    • 3
  • Eleftheria Tsourlidaki
    • 4
  1. 1.University of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.University of TartuTartuEstonia
  4. 4.Ellinogermaniki Agogi Scholi Panagea SavvaPalliniGreece