Abstract
This study employed a case study design (Yin, Case study research, design and methods, 2009) to investigate the processes used by 5th graders to design and develop computer games within the context of their environmental science unit, using the theoretical framework of constructionism. Ten fifth graders designed computer games using Scratch software. The results showed students were able to design functional games, following a learning-by-design process of planning, designing, testing, and sharing. Observations revealed that game design led to opportunities for informal knowledge building and sharing among students. This, in turn, encouraged students to test and improve their designs. The findings support the conclusion that elementary students can develop programming concepts and create computer games when using graphical programming software developed for their level of experience. Insights into the iterative process of learning-by-game design are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 5(1), 86–108.
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.
Bruckman, A., & Resnick, M. (1995). The MediaMOO Project: Constructionism and professional community. Convergence, 1(1), 94–109.
Carver, S. (2006). Assessing for deep understanding. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 205–221). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Chapman, R. (2009). Encouraging peer sharing: Learning reflections in a community of designers. In Y. B. Kafai, K. A. Peppler, & R. N. Chapman (Eds.), The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities (pp. 81–90). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000). Alice: A 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. In Proceedings of 5th Annual CCSC Northeastern Conference (pp. 28–29). Ramapo, NJ.
Dickey, M. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computers and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Design, 53(2), 67–83.
Gargarian, G. (1996). The art of design. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 125–160). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., & Gabbitas, B. (2009). Re-examining cognition during student-centered, web-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 767–785.
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school (pp. 41–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.
Ioannidou, A., Rader, C., Repenning, A., Lewis, C., & Cherry, G. (2003). Making constructionism work in the classroom. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(1), 63–108.
Kafai, Y. B. (1998). Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 90–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kafai, Y. B. (2006a). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.
Kafai, Y. B. (2006b). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students’ science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323–363.
Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers and Education, 51, 1609–1620.
Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–66.
Lin, J., Yen, L., Yang, M., & Chen., L. (2005). Teaching computer programming in elementary schools: A pilot study. Presented at NECC, Taiwan. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.stagecast.com/pdf/research/Lin_NECC2005_Paper_RP.pdf.
Malan D. J., & Leitner, H. H. (2007) Scratch for budding computer scientists. SIGCSE 2007, Covington, KY.
Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. SIGCSE 2008, Portland, OR, USA. Retrieved March 20, 2009 from http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Research.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15(2), 50–53.
Overmars, M. H. (2004). Learning object-oriented design by creating games. IEEE Potentials, 23(5), 11–13.
Papert, S. (1993a). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1993b). The children’s machine: Rethinking schools in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007a). What video game making can teach us about learning and literacy: Alternative pathways into participatory cultures. Tokyo, Japan: The Digital International Game Research Association Meeting.
Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007b). From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 149–166.
Prensky, M. (2008). Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1004–1019.
Repenning, A., & Ioannidou, A. (2008). Broadening participation through scalable game design. SIGCSE Bulletin, 1(40), 305–309.
Rieber, L.P., Luke, N., & Smith, J. (1998). Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at work through play. Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal, 1(1). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/jan98/index.htm.
Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers and Education, 50, 559–578.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Sefton-Green, J. (2003). Informal learning: Substance or style? Teaching Education, 13(1), 37–52.
Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers and Education, 46(3), 223–234.
Squire, K. (2006). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol1_issue6/Changing_the_Game_What_Happens_When_Video_Games_Enter_the_Classroom_pdf.
Squire, K., Giovanetto, L., Devane, B., & Durga, S. (2005). From users to designers: Building a self-organizing game-based learning environment. TechTrends, 49(5), 34–74.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006). A development of portfolio for learning assessment of students taught by full-scale constructionism approach at Darunsikkhalai School. Education, 13(2), 24–36.
Tiong, K., & Yong, S. (2008). Learning through computer game design: Possible success (or failure) factors. The 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 947–951). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.apsce.net/ICCE2008/papers/ICCE2008-paper293.pdf.
Van Eck, R. (2006). Using games to promote girls’ positive attitudes toward technology. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue3/Using_Games_to_Promote_Girls’_Positive_Attitudes_Toward_Technology.pdf.
Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 113–140.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 117–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work is based upon the doctoral dissertation completed by the first author at The Pennsylvania State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baytak, A., Land, S.M. An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 765–782 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z