Exposing and deposing hyper-economized school science
- John Lawrence Bencze
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Despite indications of the problematic nature of laissez faire capitalism, such as the convictions of corporate leaders and the global financial crisis that appeared to largely stem from a de-regulated financial services industry, it seems clear that societies and environments continue to be strongly influenced by hyper-economized worldviews and practices. Given the importance of societal acceptance of a potentially dominant ideological perspective, it is logical to assume that it would be critical for students to be prepared to function in niches prioritizing unrestricted for-profit commodity exchanges. Indeed, in their article in this issue, Lyn Carter and Ranjith Dediwalage appear to support this claim in their analyses of the large-scale and expensive Australian curriculum and instruction project, Sustainability by the Bay. More specifically, they effectively demonstrate that this project manifests several characteristics that would suggest neoliberal and neoconservative influences—ideological perspectives that they argue are largely fundamental to the functioning of the global economic system. In this forum article, possible adverse effects of neoliberalism and neoconservatism on school science are discussed—with further justification for Carter and Dediwalage’s concerns. Additionally, however, this article raises the possibility of subverting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in science education through application of communitarian ideals.
- Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287. CrossRef
- Allchin, D. (2004). Should the sociology of science be rated X? Science Education, 88, 934–946. CrossRef
- Alperovitz, G., & Daly, L. (2008). Unjust deserts: How the rich are taking our common inheritance. New York: New Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: AAAS.
- Apple, M. W. (2001). Creating profits by creating failures: Standards, markets and inequality in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2/3), 103–118. CrossRef
- Bakan, J. (2003). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Toronto: Viking.
- Barlow, M., & Robertson, H.-J. (1994). Class warfare: The assault on Canada’s schools. Toronto: Key Porter.
- Bencze, J. L. (2000). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 847–865. CrossRef
- Bencze, J. L., & Alsop, S. (2009). A critical and creative inquiry into school science inquiry. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), The world of science education: North America (pp. 27–47). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
- Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561–580. CrossRef
- Darwin, C. (2004). The descent of man: And selection in relation to sex. London: Penguin Books. (originally published in 1871).
- Dobbin, M. (1998). The myth of the good corporate citizen: Democracy under the rule of big business. Toronto: Stoddart.
- Eiglad, E., & Bookchin, M. (2007). Social ecology and communalism. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
- Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New revised 20th-anniversay ed.). New York: Continuum.
- Gabbard, D. A. (Ed.). (2000a). Knowledge and power in the global economy: Politics and the rhetoric of school reform. Mahwah, NL: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
- Gabbard, D. A. (2000b). Introduction. In D. A. Gabbard (Ed.), Knowledge and power in the global economy: Politics and the rhetoric of school reform (pp. xiii–xxiii). Mahwah, NL: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
- Giroux, H. A., & Giroux, S. S. (2006). Challenging neoliberalism’s new world order: The promise of critical pedagogy. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 6(1), 21–32. CrossRef
- Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (1999). Working with/against globalization in education. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 85–97. CrossRef
- Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135. CrossRef
- Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670. CrossRef
- Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Lash, S. (2002). The critique of information. London: Sage.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. CrossRef
- Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 823–838. CrossRef
- Loye, D. (Ed.). (2004). The great adventure: Toward a fully human theory of evolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Lynas, M. (2008). Six degrees: Our future on a hotter planet (updated edition). London: Harper Perennial.
- McLaren, P., & Baltodano, M. P. (2000). The future of teacher education and the politics of resistance. Teaching Education, 11(1), 47–60. CrossRef
- McMurtry, J. (1999). The cancer stage of capitalism. London: Pluto.
- Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77, 7–18.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Reich, R. B. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. London: Simon and Schuster.
- Shapiro, H. S. (2000). Empowerment. In D. A. Gabbard (Ed.), Knowledge and power in the global economy: Politics and the rhetoric of school reform (pp. 103–110). Mahwah, NL: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
- Weinstein, W. A. (2000). Ideology. In D. A. Gabbard (Ed.), Knowledge and power in the global economy: Politics and the rhetoric of school reform (pp. 95–101). Mahwah, NL: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ziman, J. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Exposing and deposing hyper-economized school science
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Volume 5, Issue 2 , pp 293-303
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Science education
- Social justice
- Environmental sustainability
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada