Communication about science in a traditional museum: visitors’ and staff’s perceptions
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study investigated visitors’ and staff’s perceptions about the communication of science in a traditional natural history museum. The research examined the science-related outcomes for adult visitors and explored visitors’ and staff’s ideas of science and how it is portrayed at the museum. Data were collected by questionnaire and interview from 84 staff and 102 visitors. Both groups held positive views about science, its importance and the need for everyone to understand it. Comparison of visitors’ pretest and posttest scores on the questionnaire revealed some significant changes, several suggesting a change to views about science that were less “scientific.” Most visitors thought that their ideas about science had not changed as a result of their visit, but they were positive about the museum as a place for learning science. Staff held more “scientific” views about the nature of science than did visitors; they recognized the potential of the museum to educate people about science, but felt it needed to be presented as more relevant and accessible, particularly in terms of science as a cultural practice. Neither staff nor visitors perceived that the museum stimulated visitors to think critically about science. While acknowledging that interpreting complex scientific knowledge into exhibits readily understood by lay visitors and displaying controversy are difficult, these challenges must be addressed if visitors are to be encouraged to think about science and the social, cultural and political contexts which shape it.
- American Association of Museums. (1992). Excellence and equity: Education and the public dimension of museums. Washington, DC: Author.
- Baldock, J. (1995). Science is... at the Birmingham museum of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 285–298. CrossRef
- Bradbourne, J. M. (2001). A new strategic approach to the museum and its relationship to society. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19, 75–84. CrossRef
- Caro, P. (1997). Tensions between science and education in museums, elsewhere. In G. Farmelo & J. Carding (Eds.), Here and now: Contemporary science and technology in museums and science centers (pp. 219–225). London: Science Museum.
- Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 108–111. CrossRef
- Durant, J. (1993). Rising to the challenge. Museums Journal, 93(10), 26–27.
- Endersby, J. (1997). The evolving museum. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 185–206. CrossRef
- Falk, J. H. (1991). Analysis of the behavior of family visitors in a natural history museum: The national museum of natural history. Curator, 34, 44–50.
- Falk, J. H. (Ed.), (2001). Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
- Fitzgerald, A., Yezril, A., & Dial, M. (1997). Commentary: Three perspectives on science exhibits in the Museum of Science and Industry, Franklin Institute, and National Zoo. Science Communication, 19, 62–80.
- Friedman, A. J. (1995). Exhibits and expectations. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 305–313. CrossRef
- Hawkey, R. (2001). The science of nature and the nature of science: Natural history museums on-line. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(4). (http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/hawkey.html).
- Henriksen, E. K. (1998). Environmental issues in the museum: Applying public perceptions in exhibition development. Curator, 41, 90–105.
- Henriksen, E. K., & Frøyland, M. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: Views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 393–415. CrossRef
- Korn, R. (1995). An analysis of differences between visitors at natural history museums and science centers. Curator, 38(3), 150–160.
- Lucas, A. M. (1983). Scientific literacy and informal learning. Studies in Science Education, 10, 1–36.
- Macdonald, S., & Silverstone, R. (1992). Science on display: The representation of scientific controversy in museum exhibitions. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 69–87. CrossRef
- McManus, P. M. (1991). Making sense of exhibits. In G. Kavanagh (Ed.), Museum languages: Objects and texts (pp. 35–46). Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
- Miles, R. S. (1986). Museum audiences. The International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 5, 73–80. CrossRef
- Miles, R. S., & Tout, A. F. (1991). Impact of research on the approach to the visiting public at the Natural history Museum, London. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 543–549.
- Molella, A. P. (1999). Science in American Life, national identity and the science wars: A curator’s view. Curator, 42, 108–116. CrossRef
- Pedretti, E. (2004). Perspectives on learning through critical issued-based science center exhibits. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S34–S47. CrossRef
- Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S4–S16. CrossRef
- Rennie, L. J., & Williams, G. F. (2002). Science centers and scientific literacy: Promoting a relationship with science. Science Education, 86, 706–726. CrossRef
- Shamos, B. M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel: Karger.
- Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493–509. CrossRef
- St. John, M., & Perry, D. (1993). A framework for evaluation and research: Science, infrastructure and relationships. In S. Bicknell, & G. Farmelo (Eds.), Museums visitor studies in the 90s (pp. 59–66). London: Science Museum.
- Communication about science in a traditional museum: visitors’ and staff’s perceptions
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Volume 1, Issue 4 , pp 791-820
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Museum education
- Scientific literacy
- Science communication