Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The “Treasures in the Sea: Use and Abuse” unit that deals with authentic socioscientific issues related to the Mediterranean was developed as part of a national effort to increase scientific literacy. The unit aimed to enhance active participation of the learners and encourage higher order thinking in class by applying teaching methods that reduce the unfamiliarity felt by students. This was expected through an explicit use of a variety of teaching and assessment-for-learning methods, suitable for Science for All students. Our main goal was to examine the culture of Science for All classes in which the unit was enacted. In order to address the main learning objectives, we monitored students’ performances in tasks that required the higher order thinking skills of argumentation and value judgment, which are central constituents of decision-making processes. We show that while socioscientific issues were discussed in whole class and small group sessions, and students’ argumentation improved, there is still a long way to go in applying a thinking culture in non-science major classes. We suggest that science teachers should shift from traditional content-based and value-free approach, to a sociocultural approach that views science as a community practice and the students as active participants in decision-making processes.
- AAAS: (1989). Science for All Americans. Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- AAAS: (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Aikenhead, G. S. (2004). The humanistic and cultural aspects of science & technology education. Paper presented at the 11th international organization for science and technology education (IOSTE) symposium, Lublin, Poland.
- Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287. CrossRef
- Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: an educational perspective. Science & Education, 8, 1–12. CrossRef
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–144.
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 8.
- Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 199–214. CrossRef
- Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430. CrossRef
- Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Learning and assessing biotechnology topics through case studies with built-in dilemmas. Science Education, 87, 767–793. CrossRef
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72.
- Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Boykoff Baron, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. (pp. 9–26) New York: W.␣H. Freeman and Company.
- Harari, H. (1994). Tomorrow 98: Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education of Israel. Jerusalem: State of Israel, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport.
- Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implication for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440. CrossRef
- Keefer, M., & Ashley, K. D. (2001). Case-based approaches to professional ethics: A systematic comparison of students’ moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 377–398. CrossRef
- Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 437–457
- Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 411–423. CrossRef
- Poole, M. (1995). Beliefs and values in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New-York: Oxford University Press.
- Roth, W. M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291. CrossRef
- Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. G. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
- Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 253–282. CrossRef
- Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science technology and society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Tal, R. T. (2004). Community-based environmental education—a case study of teacher-parent collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 10, 523–543. CrossRef
- Tal, R. T. (2005). Implementing multiple assessment modes in an interdisciplinary environmental education course. Environmental Education Research, 11, 575–601. CrossRef
- Tal, R. T., & Hochberg, N. (2003). Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections: Participating in WISE project in Israel. Science Education International, 14, 3–19.
- Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. J., Keiny, S., & Zoller, U. (2001). Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development—the STEMS project approach. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 247–261. CrossRef
- Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. J., & Lazarowitz, R. (2000). A project-based alternative assessment system. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 171–191. CrossRef
- Tishman, S., Perkins, D., & Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Tobin, K. (2005). Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners. Science Education, 89, 577–594. CrossRef
- Tobin, K., Capie, W., & Bettencourt, A. (1988). Active teaching for higher cognitive learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 17–27.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of an argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377. CrossRef
- Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145–181. CrossRef
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62. CrossRef
- Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Volume 1, Issue 4 , pp 615-644
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Science for all
- Socioscientific issues
- Citizen science
- Assessment for learning