HSS Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 52–56

Symptomatic Glenoid Loosening Complicating Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Authors

  • Bradley S. Raphael
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
  • Russell F. Warren
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
  • Mark Figgie
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
  • Edward V. Craig
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
  • Stephen Fealy
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
  • David M. Dines
    • Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI: 10.1007/s11420-009-9148-1

Cite this article as:
Raphael, B.S., Dines, J.S., Warren, R.F. et al. HSS Jrnl (2010) 6: 52. doi:10.1007/s11420-009-9148-1

Abstract

Glenoid component loosening is one of the most common causes of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Previous reports indicate that it is desirable to reimplant the glenoid component during revision shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the satisfaction of patients undergoing glenoid revision (reimplantation or resection) following total shoulder replacement specifically for symptomatic glenoid loosening. Twenty-eight shoulders that developed symptomatic glenoid loosening following primary total shoulder arthroplasty were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients either underwent resection followed by reimplantation of the glenoid component (13) or resection of the component with or without bone grafting (15). Each patient was evaluated with the UCLA Shoulder Scale and the Constant–Murley Shoulder Assessment. There were seven excellent, 13 good, five fair and three poor results on the UCLA score. Functional outcome scores trended higher in the reimplantation group but were not statistically significant. Both groups reported equal pain relief and satisfaction. Five out of 15 patients underwent arthroscopic resection of the glenoid, and these patients scored as well on the UCLA and Constant scores as the reimplantation group. When symptomatic glenoid loosening is the indication for revision total shoulder replacement, patients tend to achieve good to excellent results. Though functional scores were slightly higher in the reimplantation group, satisfaction was equally high in both groups. Resection, when indicated, should be performed arthroscopically as this improved functional outcome in our series.

Keywords

revision shoulder arthroplasty glenoid loosening reimplantation

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2010