A Business Case for Quality Improvement in Addiction Treatment: Evidence from the NIATx Collaborative
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) promotes treatment access and retention through a customer-focused quality improvement model. This paper explores the issue of the “business case” for quality improvement in addiction treatment from the provider’s perspective. The business case model developed in this paper is based on case examples of early NIATx participants coupled with a review of the literature. Process inefficiencies indicated by long waiting times, high no-show rates, and low continuation rates cause underutilization of capacity and prevent optimal financial performance. By adopting customer-focused practices aimed at removing barriers to treatment access and retention, providers may be able to improve financial performance, increase staff retention, and gain long-term strategic advantage.
- Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, D.C.: National Academy, 2000.
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy, 2001.
- Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series Washington, DC: National Academy, 2005.
- Fishbein R, McCarty D. Quality Improvement for Publicly-Funded Substance Abuse Treatment Services. In: Gibelman M, Demone HW (eds). Private Solutions to Public Problems. Volume 2 ed. New York: Springer, 1997, pp. 39–57.
- Patel KK, Butler B, Wells KB. What is necessary to transform the quality of mental health care. Health affairs [serial online]. 2006;25:681–693. CrossRef
- Young AS, Magnabosco JL. Services for Adults with Mental Illness. In: Lubotsky LB, Petrila J, Hennessy KD (eds). Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 177–208.
- McCarty D, Gustafson D, Capoccia V, et al. Improving care for the treatment of alcohol and drug disorders. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2009;36:52–60. CrossRef
- Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, et al. The business case for quality: Case examples and an analysis. Health affairs. 2003;22:17. CrossRef
- Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: The state of the science. Health affairs. 2005;24:138. CrossRef
- McLellan AT, Carise D, & Kleber HD. Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public’s demand for quality care? Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2003;25:117–121. CrossRef
- Johnson A, Roman P. Predicting closure of private substance abuse treatment facilities. Journal of mental health administration. 2002;29:115.
- Compton WM, Stein JB, Robertson EB, et al. Charting a course for health services research at the national institute on drug abuse. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2005;29:167–172. CrossRef
- Corredoira RA, Kimberly JR. Industry evolution through consolidation: Implications for addiction treatment. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2006;31:255–265. CrossRef
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug use and Health: National Findings. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-34, 2008.
- Farabee D, Leukefeld CG, Hays L. Accessing drug-abuse treatment: Perceptions of out-of- treatment injectors. Journal of Drug Issues. 1998;28:381–394.
- McConnell KJ, Hoffman KA, Quanbeck A, et al. Management practices in substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2009;37:79–89. CrossRef
- Gustafson DH, Hundt AS. Findings of innovation research applied to quality management principles for health care. Health care management review. 1995;20:p16(18).
- Ford II JH, Green CA, Hoffman KA, et al. Quality improvement needs in substance abuse treatment: Admissions walk-through results. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2007;33:379–389. CrossRef
- Delbecq AL, Gustafson DH, Van de Ven AH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1975.
- Deming WE. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: MIT-Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1982.
- McCarty D, Gustafson DH, Wisdom JP, et al. The network for the improvement of addiction treatment (NIATx): Enhancing access and retention. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2007;88:138–145. CrossRef
- Hoffman KA, Ford II JH, Choi D, et al. Replication and sustainability of improved access and retention within the network for the improvement of addiction treatment. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2008;98:63–69. CrossRef
- Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction, 1967.
- Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Ed., Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003.
- Bailit M, Dyer MB. Beyond bankable dollars: Establishing a business case for improving health care. The Commonwealth Fund. 2004.
- Hser Y, Maglione M, Polinsky ML, et al. Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 1998;15:213–220. CrossRef
- Stark MJ, Campbell BK, Brinkerhoff CV. “Hello, may we help you?” A study of attrition prevention at the time of the first phone contact with substance-abusing clients. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16:67–76. CrossRef
- Acton JP. Nonmonetary factors in the demand for medical services: Some empirical evidence. The Journal of Political Economy. 1975;83:595–614. CrossRef
- Zarkin GA, Galinis DN, French MT, et al. Financing strategies for drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 1995;12:385–399. CrossRef
- Hung DY, Rundall TG, Cohen DJ, et al. Productivity and turnover in PCPs: The role of staff participation in decision-making. Medical care. 2006;44:946–951. CrossRef
- Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Kountz MR, et al. Pretreatment dropout as a function of treatment delay and client variables. Addictive Behaviors. 1995;20:111–115. CrossRef
- Gryczynski J, Schwartz R, O’Grady K, et al. Treatment entry among individuals on a waiting list for methadone maintenance. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35:290–294. CrossRef
- A Business Case for Quality Improvement in Addiction Treatment: Evidence from the NIATx Collaborative
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Volume 39, Issue 1 , pp 91-100
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Wisconsin—Madison, 4161B Mechanical Engineering, 1513 University Ave, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
- 2. APT Foundation, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
- 3. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA