Addiction Treatment Agencies’ Use of Data: A Qualitative Assessment
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Addiction treatment agencies typically do not prioritize data collection, management, and analysis, and these agencies may have barriers to integrating data in agency quality improvement. This article describes qualitative findings from an intervention designed to teach 23 addiction treatment agencies how to make data-driven decisions to improve client access to and retention in care. Agencies demonstrated success adopting process improvement and data-driven strategies to make improvements in care. Barriers to adding a process improvement and data-driven focus to care included a lack of a data-based decision making culture, lack of expertise and other resources, treatment system complexity, and resistance. Factors related to the successful adoption of process-focused data include agency leadership valuing data and providing resources, staff training on data collection and use, sharing of change results, and success in making data-driven decisions.
- McLellan AT, Carise D, Kleber HD. The national addiction treatment infrastructure: Can it support the public’s demand for quality care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;25:117–121. CrossRef
- Ogborne AC, Braun K, Rush BR. Developing an integrated information system for specialized addiction treatment agencies. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 1998;25(1):100–108. CrossRef
- Camp JM, Krakow M, McCarty D, et al. Substance abuse treatment management information systems: Balancing federal, state, and service provider needs. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1992;19:5–19. CrossRef
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
- Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-use Conditions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006.
- Essock SM, Goldman, HH, Van Tosh L, et al. Evidence-based practices: setting the context and responding to concerns. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2003;26(4):919–38. CrossRef
- Knights D, Murray F. Politics and pain in managing information technology: A case study from insurance. Organization Studies. 1992;13(2):211–228.
- Gustafson DH, Schoofs Hundt A. Findings of innovation research applied to quality management principles for health care. Health Care Management. 1995;20(2):16–33.
- Capoccia V, Cotter F, Gustafson D, et al. (in press). Making Stone Soup: How Process Improvement Is Changing the Addiction Treatment Field. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
- Langley GJ, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.
- McCarty D, Gustafson DH, Wisdom JP, et al. (in press). The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment: Strategies to enhance access and retention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
- Boyzatis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
- Garnick DW, Lee MT, Chalk M, et al. Establishing the feasibility of performance measures for alcohol and other drugs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;23(4):375–85. CrossRef
- McCorry F, Garnick D, Bartlett J, et al. Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 2000;26(11):633–43.
- Dick RS, Steen EB. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
- Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians’ use of clinical information systems. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 1997;40(8):83–90.
- Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006;174(11):1573–1578. CrossRef
- National Board for Certified Counselors and Affiliates. National Counselor Examination for Licensure and Certification. No date. Available at: http://www.nbcc.org/ncestats. Accessed March 7, 2006.
- Burlton RT. Business Process Management. Indianapolis, IN: Sams Publishing; 2001.
- Addiction Treatment Agencies’ Use of Data: A Qualitative Assessment
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Volume 33, Issue 4 , pp 394-407
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- information services
- substance abuse treatment centers
- quality of health care
- health services needs and demand
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road CB 669, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- 2. Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment National Program Office, University of Wisconsin, 610 Walnut Street, Room 1128, Madison, WI, 53726, USA
- 3. Quality Management & Health Information Management, Timberline Knolls, LLC, 40 Timberline Drive, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA