Pediatric Telepsychiatry in Ontario: Caregiver and Service Provider Perspectives
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Families in rural areas face significant geographic and economic obstacles to obtaining pediatric mental health services. Telepsychiatry promises the possibility of extending specialized expertise into areas that have no resident psychiatrists. In this study, user perspectives and experiences of a pediatric telepsychiatry program serving rural communities in Ontario, Canada, were explored. Qualitative, exploratory methods were utilized because of the complex nature of mental health services needs and provision in rural communities. Focus groups with rural mental health service providers and interviews with family caregivers of children receiving a telepsychiatry consultation were conducted. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the benefits and limitations of providing pediatric psychiatric services via video-technology to inform future program development and health policy. Whereas participants in the study indicated that their experiences with the telepsychiatry service had been positive, the need for additional local services to support treatment recommendations was emphasized.
- Bishop JE, O’Reilly RL, Maddox K, et al. Client satisfaction in a feasibility study comparing face-to-face interviews with telepsychiatry. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2002;8(4):217–221. CrossRef
- Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: A systematic review of the literature. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2001;7(4):293–316. CrossRef
- Gelber H. The experience in Victoria with telepsychiatry for the child and adolescent mental health service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2001;7(Suppl2):32–34. CrossRef
- D’Souza R. A pilot study of an educational service for rural mental health practitioners in South Australia using telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2000;6(1):187–189. CrossRef
- Baer L, Elford DR, Cukor P. Telepsychiatry at forty: What have we learned? Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 1997;5(1):7–17. CrossRef
- Alessi N. Child and adolescent telepsychiatry: reliability studies needed. Cyberpsychology and Behavior. 2000;3(6):1009–1015. CrossRef
- Aas IH. A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2001;7:18–26. CrossRef
- May C, Gask L, Ellis N, et al. Telepsychiatry evaluation in the north west of England: preliminary results of a qualitative study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2000;6(1):20–22. CrossRef
- Ermer DJ. Experience with a rural telepsychiatry clinic for children and adolescents. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50(2):260–261.
- Letvak S. The importance of social support for rural mental health. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2002;23:249–261. CrossRef
- Starr S, Campbell LR, Herrick CA. Factors affecting use of the mental health system by rural children. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2002;23:291–304. CrossRef
- McCabe S, Macnee CL. Weaving a new safety net of mental health care in rural America: a model of integrated practice. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2002;23:263–278. CrossRef
- Boydell KM, Greenberg N, Volpe T. Designing a framework for evaluating pediatric telepsychiatry: a participatory approach. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2004;10(3):165–169. CrossRef
- Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990.
- Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health. 1994;16(1):103–121. CrossRef
- Powell RA, Single HM, Lloyd KR. Focus groups in mental health research: enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. International Journal of Social Psychology. 1996;42 (3):193–206.
- Goss JD, Leinbach TR. Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area. 1996;28(2):115–123.
- Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504. CrossRef
- Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal. 1995;311:299–302.
- Morgan DL, ed. Successful Focus Groups. London: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1993.
- Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1997.
- Burgess J. Focusing on fear. Area. 1996;28(2):130–136.
- Charmaz K. Translating graduate qualitative methods into undergraduate teaching: intensive interviewing as a case example. Teaching Sociology. 1991;19:384–395. CrossRef
- McCracken G. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1988.
- Sandolowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health. 2000;23: 334–340. CrossRef
- Diekelmann NL. Learning-as-testing: a Heideggerian hermeneutical analysis of the lived experiences of students and teachers in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science. 1992;14(3):72–83.
- Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1998.
- Erlandson DA, Harris EL, Skipper BL, et al. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1993.
- Pediatric Telepsychiatry in Ontario: Caregiver and Service Provider Perspectives
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Volume 33, Issue 1 , pp 105-111
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Children’s mental health
- health policy
- program evaluation
- qualitative methods
- health care delivery
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Community Health Systems Resource Group, The Hospital for Sick Children, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry & Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6G 1X8, Canada
- 2. Department Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6G 1X8, Canada
- 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6G 1X8, Canada