Ackerman, M. S., & Halverson, C. (2004). Sharing expertise: The next step for knowledge management. In V. Wulf & M. H. Huysman (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 273–299). Cambridge: MIT.
Alamargot, D., & Andriessen, J. (2002). The “power” of text production activity in collaborative modelling: Nine recommendations to make a computer supported situation work. In M. Baker, P. Brna, K. Stenning, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The role of communication in learning to model (pp. 275–302). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25
Andriessen, J., & Sandberg, J. (1999). Where is education heading and how about AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130–150.
Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16
Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31–63). Elsevier Science Publishers.
Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87
Boekaerts, M. & Simons, P. R. J. (1995). Leren en instructie: Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and instruction: Psychology of the learner and his learning process]. Assen: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
Brush, B. A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A., & Gupta, A. (2002). Supporting interaction outside of class: Anchored discussion vs. discussion boards. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002
(pp. 425–434). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRef
Cakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4
Carlon, S., Woods, D. B., Berg, B., Claywell, L., LeDuc, K., Marcisz, N., et al. (2012). The community of inquiry instrument: Validation and results in online health care disciplines. Computers in Education, 59
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjects, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 25
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39.
Clark, J. (2001). Stimulation collaboration and discussion in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 4
Cobos, R., & Pifarré, M. (2008). Collaborative knowledge construction in the web supported by the KnowCat system. Computers in Education, 50
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3
De Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., Van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21
Dennen, V. (2008). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 24
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., & Bétrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 141–165). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ding, N. (2009). Visualizing the sequential process of knowledge elaboration in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Computers in Education, 52
Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25
Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 21
Eryilmaz, E., Alrushiedat, N., Kasemvilas, S., Mary, J., & Van der Pol, J. (2009). The effect of anchoring online discussion on collaboration and cognitive load. In: Proceedings of 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, California.
Eryilmaz, E., Ryan, T., Van der Pol, J., Kasemvilas, S., & Mary, J. (2013). Fostering quality and flow of online learning conversations by artifact-centered discourse systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1).
Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10
Garrison, D. R., Innes, M. C., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166.
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9
Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers in Education, 47
Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond baron and kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1
Herrmann, T., & Kienle, A. (2008). Context-oriented communication and the design of computer-supported discursive learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3
Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14
Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., & Turoff, M. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 103–125.
Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y., & Mei Lin Ho, C. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life. Computers in Education, 53
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23
Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22
Jeong, A., & Frazier, S. (2008). How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39
Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6
Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55
King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning,
King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41
Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments (pp. 3–30) Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2
Mäkitalo, K., Salo, P., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. 2001. Analysing the mechanisms of common ground in collaborative web-based interaction. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 445–453). Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
Mayer, R. H. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Volume II (pp. 141–160). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2
Morgan, R., Whorton, J., & Gunsalus, C. (2000). A comparison of short-term and long-term retention: Lecture combined with discussion versus cooperative learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(1), 53–58.
Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In T. Kosschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning: The next 10 years (pp. 460–469). Mahwah: Lawrance Erlbaum.
Murphy, E., & Manzanares, R. M. A. (2005). Reading between the lines: Understanding the role of latent content in the analysis of online asynchronous discussions. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(6), 23–32.
Murray, B. (2000). Reinventing class discussion online. Monitor on Psychology, 31(4), 54–56.
Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2009). Strategies for collaborative writing and phases of knowledge construction in CSCL environments. Computers in Education, 53
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86
Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers in Education, 42
Pfister, H. R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 581–582). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational researcher, 24(7), 5–12.
Poesio, M., & Muskens, R. (1997). The dynamics of discourse situations. In P. Dekker, M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, (pp. 247–252). University of Amsterdam, ILLC, December.
Ponnusawmy, H., & Santally, M. I. (2008). Promoting (quality) participation in online forums: A study of the use of forums in two online modules at the University of Mauritius. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 5(4), 1550–6908.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40
Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological methods, 16(2), 93.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1970). The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, 40(3), 325–336.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19
Schwartz, D. L., & Lin, X. D. (2000). Computers, productive agency, and the effort after shared meaning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(2), 3–33.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster epistemic engagement and cognitive presence in online education. Computers in Education, 52
Simons, P. R. J. (2000). Towards a constructivistic theory of self-directed learning. Self-learning,
Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Jaspers, J., & Janssen, J. (2010). Guiding students' online complex learning-task behavior through representational scripting. Computers in Human Behavior, 26
Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Janssen, J., & Phielix, C. (2010). Fostering complex learning-task performance through scripting student use of computer supported representational tools. Computers in Education, 55
Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge building. Proc. Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2000) (pp. 70–77). Ann Arbor, MI.
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers in Education, 46
Suthers, D. (2001). Collaborative representations: Supporting face-to-face and online knowledge-building discourse. Paper presented at the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1
Suthers, D., & Xu, J. (2002). Kukakuka: An online environment for artifact-centered discourse. Paper presented at the Eleventh World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Suthers, D., Girardeau, L., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). Deictic roles of external representations in face-to-face and online collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 173–182). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Suthers, D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers in Education, 50
Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12
Takeda, T., & Suthers, D. (2002). Online workspaces for annotation and discussion of documents. Poster presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002.
Timmers, C., & Veldkamp, B. (2011). Attention paid to feedback provided by a computer-based assessment for learning on information literacy. Computers in Education, 56
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uren, V., Buckingham, S., Li, G., Domingue, J., & Motta, E. (2003). Scholarly publishing and argument in hyperspace. Presented at the 12th International World Wide Web Conference. Budapest, Hungary.
Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006a). The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1
Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006b). Context enhancement for co-intentionality and co-reference in asynchronous CMC. AI & Society, 20
Van Merriënboer, J. P., Kirschner, P. A., & Loesbeth, K. (2003). Taking the load off a learners mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38
Veerman, A., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (1999). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 31(4), 77–86.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000). A cognitive three-process model of computer-mediated group interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9
Wolfe, J. (2008). Annotations and the collaborative digital library: Effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3
Yang, Y., Newby, T., & Robert, B. (2008). Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners’ critical thinking skills. Computers in Education, 50