Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches
(pp. 31–63). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, 708–722.Google Scholar
Bernheim Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A., & Gupta, A. (2002). Supporting interaction outside of class: Anchored discussion vs. discussion boards. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002
(pp. 425–434). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P. R. J. (1995). Leren en instructie: Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces. (Learning and instruction: Psychology of the student and the learning process). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Cadiz, J. J., Gupta, A., & Grudin, J. (2000). Using web annotations for asynchronous collaboration around documents. In D. G. Durand (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000
(pp. 309–318). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasly (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition
(pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. B., Weinberger, A., Jucks, I., Spitulnik, M., & Wallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer-supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, & Practice
(1), 55–82.Google Scholar
Davis, J. R., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (1995). Shared annotation for cooperative learning. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 1995
(pp. 84–88). Bloomington: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002
(pp. 625–626). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg, (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches
(pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fay N., Garrod, S. C., & Carletta J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size. Psychological Science
(6), 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussell, S. R., & Benimoff, N. I. (1995). Social and cognitive processes in interpersonal communication: Implications for advanced telecommunications technologies. Human Factors
, 228–250.Google Scholar
Gay, G., Sturgill, A., Martin, W., & Huttenlocher, D (1999). Document-centered peer collaborations: An exploration of the educational uses of networked communication technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(3).
Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2004). Language efficiency and visual technology: Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology
, 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research
(4), 397–431.Google Scholar
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences
(4), 437–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, T., & Kienle, A. (2003, January). Integration of communication, coordination and learning material—A guide for the functionality of collaborative learning environments. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa, Hawaii.
Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Designing new media for a new millennium: Collaborative technology for learning, education, and training proceedings of CSCL 1999
(pp. 232–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. A. (1998). Electronic discussions in learning and teaching: Why they don’t work, and how they might. Connexions: The Newsletter of the International Society for the Exploration of Teaching Alternatives, 10
(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Järvelä, S. & Häkkinen, P. (2000, June). Levels of Web-based discussion: Theory of perspective-taking as a tool for analysing interaction. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference on the Learning Sciences
(pp. 22–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A qualitative approach. Learning and Instruction
(5), 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching
. London: Routeledge.Google Scholar
Lipponen, L. (2001). Computer-supported collaborative learning: From promises to reality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mäkitalo, K., Salo, P., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2001, August). Analysing the mechanisms of a common ground in Web-based interaction. Paper presented at the JURE pre-conference of the 9th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Marshall, C. C., & Bernheim Brush, A. J. (2002, April). From personal to shared annotations. Paper presented at CHI 2002, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching.
Proceedings of the ninth annual teaching and learning forum.
Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development
. London: Stylus.Google Scholar
Nokelainen, P., Miettinen, M., Kurhila, J., Floréen, P., & Tirri, H. (2005). A shared document-based annotation tool to support learner-centered collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology
(5), 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education
(3), 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petraglia, J. (1998). Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education
. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher
(7), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, R. (2004). Developing discussion for learning. 2004 Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20
(pp. 161–164). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schoonenboom, J. (2002). A template for discussing large texts on the web: The Pragglejaz site. British Journal of Educational Technology
(1), 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D. L., & Lin, X. D. (2000). Computers, productive agency, and the effort after shared meaning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education
(2), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, W. (2000). Annotation engine (Technical report). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Berkman Center for Internet & Society.Google Scholar
Simons, P. R. J., Van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). New learning: Three ways to learn in a new balance. In P. R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), New learning
(pp. 1–20). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sringam, C.,w & Geer, R. (2000, September). An Investigation of an instrument for analysis of student-led electronic discussions. Paper presented at ASCILITE 2000, Coffs Harbour, Australia.
Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the learning sciences
(pp. 70–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sumner, T., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2001). JIME: An interactive journal for interactive media. First Monday, 6(2).
Suthers, D. (2005) Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years
(pp. 135–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Takeda, T., & Suthers, D. (2002, May). Online workspaces for annotation and discussion of documents. Poster session presented at WWW 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Van der Pol, J. (2002, January). Identifying and modeling variables in complex CSCL-situations. Case study: The use of asynchronous electronic discussions. Paper presented the Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction at CSCL2002, Boulder, CO.
Van der Pol, J., & Admiraal, W. (2003). Het succesvol inzetten van asynchrone elektronsiche discussies. (Succesfully implementing asynchronous online discussions). Onderzoek van Onderwijs
(2), 26–31.Google Scholar
Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006). Context enhancement for co-intentionality and co-reference. AI & society, 22(3).
Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Educational Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2002). CSCLearning? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, IVLOS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wan, D., & Johnson, P. M. (1994). Experiences with Clare: A computer supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Systems
, 851–879.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal
(3), 470–481.Google Scholar