Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges.
Educational Psychologist, 45, 210–223.
CrossRefBannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning?
Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.
CrossRefBoekaerts, M., & Rozendaal, J. S. (2010). Using multiple calibration indices in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students' accuracy of feeling of confidence.
Learning and Instruction, 20, 372–382.
CrossRefBrown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. S. Siegler & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Chen, P. P. (2002). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students.
Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 77–90.
CrossRefCohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences.
Learning and Instruction, 9, 343–363.
CrossRefCromley, J., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items.
Metacognition and Learning, 6, 155–177.
CrossRefDesoete, A. (2007). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5, 705–730.
Desoete, A. (2008). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: how you test is what you get.
Metacognition and Learning, 3, 189–206.
CrossRefDesoete, A. (2009). Metacognitive prediction and evaluation skills and mathematical learning in third-grade students.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 435–446.
CrossRefDesoete, A., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). Metacognition in mathematics: Critical issues on nature, theory, assessment and treatment. In A. Desoete & M. V. J. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 1–10). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435.
CrossRefDignath, C., & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level.
Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.
CrossRefEdens, K., & Potter, E. (2007). The relationship of drawing and mathematical problem solving: "draw for math" tasks. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, 48, 282–298.
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: what can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?
Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.
CrossRefElshout, J. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (1993). Using the computer as a help tool during learning by doing.
Computers in Education, 21, 115–122.
CrossRefEricsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods.
Psychological Bulletin, 137, 316–344.
CrossRefFuchs, L. S., Zumeta, R. O., Schumacher, R. F., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (2010). The effects of schema-broadening instruction on second graders' word-problem performance and their ability to represent word problems with algebraic equations: a randomized control study.
The Elementary School Journal, 110, 440–463.
CrossRefGreene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners' self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments.
Educational Psychologist, 45, 203–209.
CrossRefHarskamp, E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Schoenveld’s problem solving theory in a student controlled learning environment.
Computers in Education, 49, 822–839.
CrossRefHegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.
CrossRefJacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. G. (2009). Student-controlled metacognitive training for solving word problems in primary school mathematics.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 447–463.
CrossRefJanssen, J., & Engelen, R. (2002). Verantwoording van de toetsen rekenen-wiskunde 2002 [Account of the mathematics tests 2002]. Arnhem: Citogroep.
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24–33.
CrossRefMcNamara, D. S. (2011). Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: challenges and successes.
Metacognition and Learning, 6, 195–203.
CrossRefMevarech, Z. R., & Amrany, C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of meta-cognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement.
Metacognition and Learning, 3, 147–157.
CrossRefMuis, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories.
The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 177–195.
CrossRefNelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition.
American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.
CrossRefNimon, K., & Reio, T. G., Jr. (2011). Regression commonality analysis: a technique for quantitative theory building.
Human Resource Development Review, 10, 329–340.
CrossRefPajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: the need for specificity of assessment.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
CrossRefPieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration - an extended conceptualization and potential applications.
Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3–31.
CrossRefPintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
CrossRefPrins, F. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: new support for the threshold of problematicity theory.
Learning and Instruction, 16, 374.
CrossRefRaven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press.
Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists.
Personnel Psychology, 47, 537–560.
CrossRefSchafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst's perspective.
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545–571.
CrossRefSchellings, G. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: problems and possibilities.
Metacognition and Learning, 6, 91–109.
CrossRefSchellings, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations.
Metacognition and Learning, 6, 83–90.
CrossRefSchoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching (pp. 224–270). New York: McMilan Publishing.
Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring.
Metacognition and Learning, 4, 33–45.
CrossRefSchraw, G. (2010). Measuring self-regulation in computer-based learning environments.
Educational Psychologist, 45, 258–266.
CrossRefSchraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
CrossRefSpearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.
CrossRefSperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117–139.
CrossRefVan der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2010). Development of metacognitive skillfulness: a longitudinal study.
Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 220–224.
CrossRefVan Essen, G., & Hamaker, C. (1990). Using self-generated drawings to solve arithmetic word problems. The Journal of Educational Research, 83, 301–312.
Van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 246–254.
CrossRefVeenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und metakognition: Implikationen für forshung und praxis (pp. 77–99). Münster: Waxmann.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2011a). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion.
Metacognition and Learning, 6, 205–211.
CrossRefVeenman, M. V. J. (2011b). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197–218). New York: Routledge.
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: age and task differences.
Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.
CrossRefVeenman, M. V. J., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2002). Het meten van metacognitieve vaardigheden [Measuring metacognitive skills]. In F. Daems, R. Rymenans, & G. Rogiest (Eds.), Onderwijsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Proceedings 29e ORD 2002 (pp. 102–103). Wilrijk: Universiteit van Antwerpen.
Veenman, M. V. J., Kerseboom, L., & Imthorn, C. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: availability versus production defiencies.
Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 13, 391.
CrossRefVeenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective.
Learning and Instruction, 14, 89.
CrossRefVeenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and meta-cognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 33, 193.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations.
Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
CrossRefVermeer, H. J., Boekaerts, M., & Seegers, G. (2000). Motivational and gender differences: sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 308–315.
CrossRefWeinstein, C. E., Zimmermann, S. A., & Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, P. A. Alexander, C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 25–40). San Diego: Academic.
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning.
Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.
CrossRefWinne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic.