Public Reason, Religious Restraint and Respect
- Richard North
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In recent years liberals have had much to say about the kinds of reasons that citizens should offer one another when they engage in public political debates about existing or proposed laws. One of the more notable claims that has been made by a number of prominent liberals is that citizens should not rely on religious reasons alone when persuading one another to support or oppose a given law or policy. Unsurprisingly, this claim is rejected by many religious citizens, including those who are also committed to liberalism. In this paper I revisit that debate and ask whether liberal citizens have a moral obligation not to explain their support for existing or proposed laws on the basis of religious reasons alone. I suggest that for most (ordinary) citizens no such obligation exists and that individuals are entitled to explain their support for a specific law and to persuade others of the merits of that law on the basis of religious reasons alone (though there may be sound prudential reasons for not doing so). My argument is grounded in the claim that in most instances advocating laws on the basis of religious reasons alone is consistent with treating citizens with equal respect. However, I acknowledge an exception to that claim is to be found when using religious reasons to justify a law also implies that the state endorses those reasons. For this reason I argue that there is a moral obligation for some (publicly influential) citizens, and especially those who hold public office, to refrain from explaining their support for existing or proposed laws on the basis of religious reasons. I conclude by suggesting that this understanding of the role of religion in public political discourse and the obligations of liberal citizens is a better reflection of our experience of liberal citizenship than that given in some well-known accounts of liberalism.
- Audi, R. (2000). Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Beitz, C. (1990). Political Equality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- D’Agostino, F. (1996). Free Public Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Darwall, S. (1977). Two Kinds of Respect. Ethics, 88(1), 36–49. CrossRef
- Eberle, C. (2002). Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Galston, W. (1991). Liberal Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gaus, & Vallier. (2009). Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(1-2), 51–76. CrossRef
- Greenawalt, K. (1992). Religious Conviction and Political Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Greenawalt, K. (1995). Private Consciences and Public Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Gutmann, & Thompson. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Larmore, C. (1987). Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Larmore, C. (2008). The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Macedo, S. (1990). The Politics of Justification. Political Theory, 18(2), 280–304. CrossRef
- Macedo, S. (1991). Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon.
- Mill, J. S. (1972). In H. B. Acton (Ed.), Considerations on Representative Government. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
- Nagel, T. (1987) ‘Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol.16 no. 3
- Perry, M. (2003). Under God: Religious Faith and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807. CrossRef
- Stout, J. (2004). Democracy and Tradition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Weithman, P. (2002). Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Waldron, J. (1987) ‘Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism’ The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.37, no.147
- Wolterstorff, N. (1997). In R. Audi (Ed.), Religion in the Public Square. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Public Reason, Religious Restraint and Respect
Volume 40, Issue 2 , pp 179-193
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Public Reason
- Richard North (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK