, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 523–538

The Ontology of Causal Process Theories


DOI: 10.1007/s11406-011-9329-2

Cite this article as:
Froeyman, A. Philosophia (2012) 40: 523. doi:10.1007/s11406-011-9329-2


There is a widespread belief that the so-called process theories of causation developed by Wesley Salmon and Phil Dowe have given us an original account of what causation really is. In this paper, I show that this is a misconception. The notion of “causal process” does not offer us a new ontological account of causation. I make this argument by explicating the implicit ontological commitments in Salmon and Dowe’s theories. From this, it is clear that Salmon’s Mark Transmission Theory collapses to a counterfactual theory of causation, while the Conserved Quantity Theory collapses to David Fair’s phsyicalist reduction of causation.


Dowe Salmon Process theories of causation Ontological commitments 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Critical Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations