The Nonworseness Claim and the Moral Permissibility of Better-Than-Permissible Acts
- Adam D. Bailey
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Grounded in what Alan Wertheimer terms the “nonworseness claim,” it is thought by some philosophers that what will be referred to herein as “better-than-permissible acts”—acts that, if undertaken, would make another or others better off than they would be were an alternative but morally permissible act to be undertaken—are necessarily morally permissible. What, other than a bout of irrationality, it may be thought, would lead one to hold that an act (such as outsourcing production to a “sweatshop” in a developing country) that produces more benefits for others than an act that is itself morally permissible (such as not doing business in the developing country at all) with respect to those same others, is not morally permissible? In this article, I argue that each of the two groups of philosophers that are most likely to accept the nonworseness claim—consequentialists and non-consequentialists—have reason to reject it, and thereby also have reason to reject the belief that better-than-permissible acts are necessarily morally permissible.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Alexander, L., & Moore, M. (2009). Deontological ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
- Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.
- Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2007). Respect for workers in global supply chains: advancing the debate over sweatshops. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 135–145.
- Bentham, J. (1843). A critical examination of the declaration of rights. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The works of Jeremy Bentham. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co.
- Boatright, J. R. (2009). Occupational health and safety. In T. L. Beauchamp, N. E. Bowie, & D. G. Arnold (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
- De George, R. T. (2005). Intellectual property and pharmaceutical drugs: an ethical analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 549–575.
- Figart, D. M. (2001). Ethical foundations of the contemporary living wage movement. International Journal of Social Economics, 28(10/11/12), 800–814. CrossRef
- Holliday, I. (2005). Doing business with rights violating regimes corporate social responsibility and Myanmar’s military junta. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 329–342. CrossRef
- Hsieh, N. (2009). Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 251–273.
- Kagan, S. (1989). The limits of morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kagan, S. (2001). Thinking about cases. Social Philosophy & Policy, 18(2), 44–63. CrossRef
- King, P. J. (2008). No plaything: ethical issues concerning child-pornography. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(3), 327–345. CrossRef
- Luce, S. (2002). “The full fruits of our labor”: the rebirth of the living wage movement. Labor History, 43(4), 401–409. CrossRef
- Noell, E. S. (2006). Smith and a living wage: competition, economic compulsion, and the scholastic legacy. History of Political Economy, 38(1), 151–174. CrossRef
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
- Oderberg, D. S. (2000). Applied ethics: a non-consequentialist approach. Malden: Blackwell.
- Pollin, R., & Luce, S. (1998). The living wage: building a fair economy. New York: The New Press.
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap.
- Scanlon, T. M. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen’s philosophy: 3 Sen and consequentialism. Economics and Philosophy, 17, 39–50. CrossRef
- Shiffrin, S. V. (2010). Incentives, motives, and talents. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(2), 111–142. CrossRef
- Snyder, J. C. (2008). Needs exploitation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), 389–405. CrossRef
- Snyder, J. (2009a). Efficiency, equity, and price gouging: a response to Zwolinski. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 303–306.
- Snyder, J. (2009b). What’s the matter with price gouging? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 275–293.
- Snyder, J. (2010). Exploitation and sweatshop labor: perspectives and issues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 187–213.
- Spurgin, E. W. (2006). Occupational safety and paternalism: Machan revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 155–173. CrossRef
- Waltman, J. L. (2004). The case for the living wage. New York: Algora.
- Werhane, P. H., & Gorman, M. E. (2005). Intellectual property rights, moral imagination, and access to life-enhancing drugs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 595–613.
- Wertheimer, A. ( 1999). Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 689–727.
- Zwolinski, M. (2008). The Ethics of Price Gouging. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3), 347–378.
- Zwolinski, M. (2009). Price gouging, non-worseness, and distributive justice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 295–303.
About this Article
- The Nonworseness Claim and the Moral Permissibility of Better-Than-Permissible Acts
Volume 39, Issue 2 , pp 237-250
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Better-than-permissible acts
- Ethical theory
- Nonworseness claim
- Political philosophy
- Adam D. Bailey (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Business, Black Hills State University, Spearfish, SD, USA