The New Cosmological Argument: O’Connor on Ultimate Explanation
- Tyron Craig Goldschmidt
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Timothy O’Connor presents a novel and powerful version of the cosmological argument from contingency. What distinguishes his argument is that it does not depend on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. This version thus avoids powerful objections facing the Principle. We present and develop the argument, strengthening it in various ways. We fill in big gaps in the argument and answer criticisms. These include the criticisms that O’Connor considers as well as new criticisms. We explain how his replies to a Kantian criticism and to the demand for contrastive explanation fail, and properly answer the criticism and the demand. We develop two new criticisms, the objection from opaqueness and the objection from constitution, and explain how these objections can be answered.
- Gale, R., & Pruss, A. (1999). A new cosmological argument. Religious Studies, 35(4), 461–476. CrossRef
- Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical intuitionism. New York: Palgrave.
- Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
- Lowe, E. J. (1996). Why is there anything at all? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 70, 111–120.
- Maimonides, M. (1956). The guide for the perplexed (Trans: Friedlander, M.). New York: Dover.
- Mawson, T. J. (2008). Why is there anything at all? In Y. Nagasawa & E. J. Wielenberg (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of religion (pp. 36–54). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Morris, T. (1985). Necessary beings. Mind, 94, 263–272. CrossRef
- Morriston, W. (2001). Omnipotence and necessary moral perfection: are they compatible? Religious Studies, 37, 143–160. CrossRef
- O’Connor, T. (2002). Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- O’Connor, T. (2008). Theism and ultimate explanation: The necessary shape of contingency. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Oppy, G. (2006). Arguing about Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Pruss, A. (2006). The principle of sufficient reason: A reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Pruss, A. (2009). ‘The leibnizian cosmological argument. In W. L. Craig & J. P. Moreland (Eds.), The blackwell companion to natural theology (pp. 24–100). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRef
- Swinburne, R. (1993). The coherence of theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Swinburne, R. (1994). The christian God. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Van Inwagen, P. (1996). Why is there anything at all? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 70, 95–110.
- The New Cosmological Argument: O’Connor on Ultimate Explanation
Volume 39, Issue 2 , pp 267-288
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Cosmological argument
- Necessary being
- Natural theology
- Philosophy of religion
- Author Affiliations
- 1. King’s College London, University of London, London, UK