Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling water flow and nitrate–nitrogen transport on golf course under turfgrass

  • SOILS AND SEDIMENTS IN URBAN AND MINING AREAS
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Golf courses are constructed from artificial layers on top of natural soil as the goal is to rapidly drain excess water through the soil profile using subsurface tile drainage system. Golf turf is one of the most intensively managed systems due to the high use of fertilizer and irrigation. Leaching and runoff of nitrogen (N) from turf can pollute surface- and groundwaters. Our objective was to understand the fate of water and nitrate–N in constructed golf course turf.

Materials and methods

We conducted a modeling study for system 1 with tile drainage and artificial soil layers and system 2 with a natural soil profile using HYDRUS 2D. Experimental data from a planned golf course in Istria, Croatia for natural soil were used. Artificial layers were constructed according to United States Golf Association (USGA) recommendations. Urea was used as the fertilizer N source at three application rates (50, 75, and 100 kg ha−1).

Results and discussion

Water flow modeling showed a large amount of tile drainage outflow in system 1, where tile drains aided in lowering the pressure head in the soil above the tile drains. In system 2, low permeability of the natural soil and lack of drainage resulted in lower pressure head in the topsoil with surface runoff during high rainfall. Results of solute simulations using HYDRUS 2D revealed that at 100 kg ha−1 scenario, 66 % of ammonium–N, and 39 % of nitrate–N were leached through tile drains rather than infiltrate into the subsoil. The distribution of the nitrate–N was predominantly influenced by the highly permeable layers and tile drainage system. However, in the absence of drainage, modeling revealed that a large amount of nitrate–N can reach bottom of the soil profile and thus leach into groundwater.

Conclusions

The modeling study revealed that using a USGA recommendation for golf course construction can reduce nitrate–N leaching into subsoil and consequently groundwater. The presence of tile drains provided a rapid conduit for transmission of water and nutrients (N species in this specific case), thus limiting infiltration of water and associated solutes into subsoil layers. Subsurface drainage systems are typically installed only on golf greens and not on the entire golf course area, while fertilizers are applied across entire golf course, which can lead to greater leaching of nitrate–N.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beard JB (1982) Turf management for golf courses. A Publication of the United States Golf Association. Macmillan, New York

  • Blonquist JM Jr, Jones SB, Robinson DA (2006) Precise irrigation scheduling for turfgrass using a subsurface electromagnetic soil moisture sensor. Agric Water Manag 84:153–165. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolado-Rodriguez S, Alonso-Gaite A, Álvarez-Benedi J (2005) Characterization of nitrogen transformations, sorption and volatilization processes in urea fertilized soils. Vadose Zone J 4:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KW (1982) Nitrogen source effect on nitrate and ammonium leaching and runoff from greens. Agron J 74:947–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KW, Duble RL, Thomas JC (1977) Influence of management and season on fate of N applied to golf greens. Agron J 69:667–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dane JH, Hopmans JW (2002) Water retention and storage: laboratory. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods, Third Edition. SSSA, Madison, WI

  • EPA (2010) Golf course adjustments factors for modifying estimated drinking water concentrations and estimated environmental concentrations generated by tier I (FIRST) and tier II (PRZM/EXAMS) models. US Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/golf_course_adjustment_factors.htm. Accessed 22/02/10

  • Fayer MJ, Rockhold ML, Campbell MD (1992) Hydrologic modeling of protective barriers: comparison of field data and simulation results. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:690–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H (1978) Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipović V, Kodešová R, Petošić D (2013) Experimental and mathematical modeling of water regime and nitrate dynamics on zero tension plate lysimeters in soil influenced by high groundwater table. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 95:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle size analysis. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 255–293

  • Green Section Staff USGA (1960) Specifications for a method of putting green construction. USGA J Turf Manag 13(3):24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson BR, Šimůnek J, Hopmans JW (2006) Evaluation of urea–ammonium–nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling. Agric Water Manag 86:102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin M, Dodd RB, Han YJ, Khalilian A (2004) Assessing nitrogen content of golf course turfgrass clippings using spectral reflectance. Appl Eng Agric 20:851–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A, Dirksen C (1986) Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Monograph no. 9. ASA-SSSA, Madison, USA

  • Lewis MA, Boustany RG, Dantin DD, Quarles RL, Moore JC, Stanley RS (2002) Effects of a coastal golf complex on water quality, periphyton and seagrass. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 53:154–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Hull RJ, Duff DT (1993) Chapter 77: comparing cultivars of three cool-season turf grasses for nitrate uptake kinetics and nitrogen recovery in the field. In: Carrow RN, Christians NE, Shearmans RC (eds) International turfgrass society research Journal 7. Intertec Publishing Corp, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancino CF, Troll J (1990) Nitrate and ammonium leaching losses from N fertilizers applied to ‘Penncross’ creeping bentgrass. Hortic Sci 25:194–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SB, Mullen MD, Cabrera ML, Wood CW, Braun LC, Guertal EA (2001) Nitrogen budget for fescue pastures fertilized with broiler litter in major land resource areas of the southeastern US. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy EL, McCoy KR (2009) Simulation of putting-green soil water dynamics: implications for turfgrass water use. Agric Water Manag 96:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1981) Evaporation and surface temperature. Q J R Meteorol Soc 107:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton TG, Gold AJ, Sullivan WM (1988) Influence of overwatering and fertilization on nitrogen losses from home lawns. J Environ Qual 17:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré K, Chantigny MH, Carey K, Dionne J (2008) Leaching of mineral and organic nitrogen from putting green profiles supporting various turfgrasses. Crop Sci 48:2010–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic AM (1990) The fate of nitrogenous fertilizers applied to turfgrass. J Environ Qual 19:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroga-Garza HM, Picchioni GA, Remmenga MD (2001) Bermudagrass fertilized with slow-release nitrogen sources. I. Nitrogen uptake and potential leaching losses. J Environ Qual 30:440–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravikumar V, Vijayakumar G, Šimůnek J, Chellamuthu S, Santhi R, Appavu K (2011) Evaluation of fertigation scheduling for sugarcane using a vadose zone flow and transport model. Agric Water Manag 98:1400–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman LM, Smith AE, Bridges DC (2000) Potential movement of nutrients and pesticides following application to golf courses. In: Clark JM, Kenna MP (eds) Fate and management of turfgrass chemicals, 743ACS Symposium Series, pp 78–93

  • Šimůnek J, Šejna M, van Genuchten MTh (1999) The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating twodimensonal movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variable saturated media. Version 2.0, IGWMC-TPS-53. International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado. Technical Manual. PC Progress, Prague

  • Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MTh, Šejna M (2006) The HYDRUS software package for simulating two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media. Version 1.0

  • Starrett SK, Christians NE, Austin TA (1995) Fate of amended urea in turfgrass biosystems. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26:1595–1606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner RA, Gange AC (2005) Effects of golf courses on local biodiversity. Landsc Urban Plan 71:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGA Green Section Staff (2004) USGA Recommendations for a method of putting green construction. Available online at http://www.usga.org/turf/course_construction/green_articles/USGA_Recommendations_For_a_Method_of_Putting_Green_Construction.pdf

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong JWC, Chan CWY, Cheung KC (1998) Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching from fertilizer applied on golf course: lysimeter study. Water Air Soil Pollut 107:335–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by the European Union MC-IOF Scholarship (PIOF-GA-2012-330669). The authors are very grateful to Paul Damon from the University of Western Australia for comments and text improvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Amelioration, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska 25, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    Vilim Filipović & Gabrijel Ondrašek

  2. Soil and Water Quality Laboratory, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, University of Florida, Wimauma, 14625 C.R. 672, Gainesville, FL, 33598, USA

    Gurpal S. Toor

  3. Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, Prague, Czech Republic

    Radka Kodešová

Authors
  1. Vilim Filipović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gurpal S. Toor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabrijel Ondrašek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Radka Kodešová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vilim Filipović.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Przemysław Charzyński

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filipović, V., Toor, G.S., Ondrašek, G. et al. Modeling water flow and nitrate–nitrogen transport on golf course under turfgrass. J Soils Sediments 15, 1847–1859 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0980-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0980-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation