Abstract
Purpose
There is no clear guidance for responsible food service operations to reduce their environmental footprint, so the efforts put forth by a restaurant may not have the environmental impact intended. As a result, Green Seal conducted life cycle assessment research on restaurants and food service operations to define priorities for environmental improvement. This information was then used to develop a sustainability standard and certification (i.e., ecolabel) program.
Methods
The life cycle assessment study focused on the day-to-day activities of running a restaurant, including direct and indirect contributions. To do this, a restaurant and food service operations model was developed by grouping the operational activities into four subsystems: food procurement, food storage, food preparation and cooking, and service/support. Data was collected from a range of restaurants in the United States. The impact categories examined included respiratory inorganics, acidification/eutrophication, fossil fuels, ecotoxicity, carcinogens, land use, and climate change.
Results and discussion
Of all the subsystems, food procurement contributed hotspots in all impact categories examined. On the contrary, the food storage subsystem contributed no hotspot in any of the impact categories examined. Normalization of the results confirmed that food procurement was the largest source of environmental impacts. In addition, it was found that the impacts of food services were dominated by land use, respiratory inorganics, and fossil fuels. The impacts could be reduced with various preferable practices. As a result, a sustainability standard for restaurants and food services was developed to include these preferable practices, the Green Seal Standard for Food Services, GS-46.
Conclusions
This study presents an overview of the main environmental impacts from the operation of a restaurant or food service. The results provided direction in the development of a sustainability standard and ecolabel program. This standard, the Green Seal Standard for Restaurants and Food Services, GS-46, is a comprehensive framework for operations to make meaningful reductions in their environmental impact. Further, operations that meet the requirements in the GS-46 standard have demonstrated significant reduction in their environmental impact. Finally, it was found that this environmental impact reduction can be done without added cost (e.g., cost neutral, with potential for financial gains).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin C (2009) Sustainability in the food industry. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames
Bellarby J et al. (2008) Cool farming: climate impacts of agriculture and mitigating potential: published by Greenpeace
Bloom J (2010). American wasteland: how America throws away nearly half of its food (and what we can do about it). Da Capo Lifelong Books. Cambridge
BLS—United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010). Consumer expenditures in 2008. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxann08.pdf
Cederberg C (2003) In: Mattsson B, Sonesson U (eds) Life cycle assessment of animal products in environmentally friendly food processing. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge
DOE—United States Department of Energy (2001) A look at commercial buildings in 1995: characteristics, energy consumption, and energy expenditures
DOE—United States Department of Energy (2003) Commercial building energy consumption survey. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/
EC—European Commission (2006). Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO): analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf
EIA—United States Energy Information Administration (2007). Average retail price of electricity to ultimate customers by end-use sector. Last accessed 4 October 2008. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat7p4.html
EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998). Reducing water pollution from animal feeding operations. Testimony before subcommittee on Forestry, Resource Conservation, and Research of the Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House of Representatives, 13 May 1998. Accessed 30 September 2008. http://www.epa.gov/ocirpage/hearings/testimony/105_1997_1998/051398.htm
EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009a). Energy star guide for restaurants. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/small_business/restaurants_guide.pdf
EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009b). Sustainable materials management: the road ahead appendix relative ranking technical support document. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.epa.gov/waste/inforesources/pubs/vision2-app.pdf
EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/calculator.html
FAO—United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (1995) Water: a finite resource in dimensions of need: an Atlas of food and agriculture. Rome. Accessed 3 October 2008 http://www.fao.org/docrep/u8480e/U8480E0c.htm#Irrigation
GGHC—Green Guide for Health Care (2007). Technical brief environmentally preferable purchasing: food. Accessed 30 September 2008. http://www.gghc.org/PilotDocsPub//GGHC%20Tech%20Briefs/GGHC_TechBrief_Food_080627.pdf
Gossling S et al. (2010). Food management in tourism: reducing tourism’s carbon footprint. Tourism Management. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.006
Green Seal (2008). Green Seal Proposed Environmental Standard for Restaurants and Food Services, GS-46, Background Document. Accessed 6 August 2010. http://www.greenseal.org/certification/gs-46_restaurants_and_food_service_proposed_standard_background_document.pdf
Green Seal (2009) Environmental leadership standard for restaurants and food services, GS-46.
Horrigan L, Lawrence R, Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):445–456
LeanPath (2008) A short guide to food waste management best practices
Mogensen L et al (2009) Life cycle assessment across the food supply chain: chapter 5. In: Baldwin C (ed) Sustainability in the food industry. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames
Monte MD, Padoano E, Pozzetto D (2005) Alternative coffee packaging: an analysis from a life cycle point of view. J Food Eng 66:405–411
National Restaurant Association (NRA) (2008) 2009 Restaurant Industry Forecast.
Nieuwenhuijsen M, Schenker M (1999) Personal exposure to dust, endotoxin and crystalline silica in California agriculture. Ann Occup Hyg 43:35–42
Piper J (2009) HVAC Maintenance and Energy Savings. Facilitiesnet. Accessed 4 August 2010. http://www.facilitiesnet.com/hvac/article/HVAC-Maintenance-and-Energy-Savings—10680
Roy P et al (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10
SCA (2009) Green buying remains strong during down economy.
Schenker M (2000) Exposures and health effects from inorganic agricultural dusts. Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases Env Hlth Persp 108(Suppl 4):661–664
Schenker M (2008) Respiratory health hazards in agriculture. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:S1–S76
IBIS World (2009) The cost of America’s groceries press release.
Worldwatch Institute (2004). Good stuff: a behind-the-scenes guide to the things we buy. Accessed 3 October 2008. http://www.worldwatch.org/system/files/GS0000.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Niels Jungbluth
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldwin, C., Wilberforce, N. & Kapur, A. Restaurant and food service life cycle assessment and development of a sustainability standard. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 40–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0234-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0234-x