Skip to main content
Log in

Experimenting with Supply Chain Learning (SCL): Supplier Diversity and Ethnic Minority Businesses

  • Published:
The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on an innovative UK-based ‘Supply Chain Learning’ (SCL) initiative to encourage the corporate sector to consider supplier diversity in respect of ethnic minority businesses. This follows academic and policy interest in programmes to empower ethnic minority enterprises to achieve breakout to mainstream markets and business growth. The first phase of the initiative, entitled Supplier Development East Midlands (SDEM) is examined. By adopting an inter-organisational action learning approach, some of the key attributes of the programme are delineated, focusing on the recurrent action-reflection cycle taking place in a learning group comprising SDEM, LPOs (Large Purchasing Organisations) and small EMSs (Ethnic Minority Suppliers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. 1978. Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, J. 1998. Organisational learning, innovation and transformational change within new product development. Paper presented at the 5th International Product Development Management Conference, Como, Italy, 25–26 May: 91–106.

  • Berthoin Antal, A., Dierkes, M., Child, J. & Nonaka, I. 2001. Organizational learning and knowledge: Reflections on the dynamics of the field and challenges for the future. In M. Diekes, A. Antal, J. Child & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational knowledge and learning: 921–939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J. 2004. Supply chain learning. In S. New & R. Westbrook (Eds.), Understanding supply chains: Concepts, critiques and futures: 165–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Kaplinsky, R. & Lamming, R. 2003. Putting supply chain learning into practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23: 167–184.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. & Duguid, P. 1991. Organisational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Sicence, 2: 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J. & Duguid, P. 1998. Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40: 90–111.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J. & Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organisation: A social practice perspective. Organizational Science, 12: 198–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. & Badham, R. 1999. Power, politics and organizational change. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D. (2004) Developing change management through insider action research and action leanring. Paper presented at the International Workshop for MPA/MBA Public Sector Programmes, Dublin 17th–19th Nov.

  • Contu, A. & Willmott, H. 2000. Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in practice: A ‘delicate flower’ in the organizational learning field. Organization: 269–276.

  • Cope, J. 2003. Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: Discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higher level’ learning. Management Learning, 34: 429–450.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., Dromgoole, T., Duff, D. & Harbison, A. 2001. Continuous improvement through collaborative action learning. International Journal of Technology Management, 22: 285–302.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D., Dromgoole, T., Duff, D., Caffrey, R., Lynch, K., Rose, I., Stack, P., McGill, A. & Sheridan, P. 2002. Effecting operational Improvement through inter-organisational action learning. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13: 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P. & Coghlan, D. 2004. Action learning: Towards a framework in inter-organisational settings. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1: 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, P.D. & Spekman, R. 2003. Strategic supply and the management of inter-and intra-organisational relationships, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9: 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. 2001. The power perspective in procurement and supply management. The Journal of Supply Management, 4 (7).

  • Croom, S. & Batchelor, J. 1997. The development of strategic capabilities—An interaction view. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8: 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S., Romano, P. & Giannakis, M. 2000. Supply chain management: An analytical framework for critical literature review. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6: 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S. 2001. The dyadic capabilities concept: Examining the process of key supplier involvement in collaborative product development. European Journal of Purchase and Supply Management, 7: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapiran, G.P. & Hogarth-Schott, S. 2003. Are co-operation and trust being confused with power? An analysis of food retailing in Australia and the UK. International Juranl of Retail and Distribution, 31: 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins, D. & Freel, M. 1998. Entrepreneurial learning and the growth process in SMEs. The Learning Organization, 5: 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345–367.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. & Huxham, C. 1996. Action Research for the study of organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. & Huxham, C. 2002. Action research. In David Partington (Ed.), Essential skills for management research: 254–272

  • Fiol, M.C. & Lyles, M.A. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10: 803–813.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. 1999. Communities of practice, Foucault and Actor Network Theory'. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 853–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., Croom, S. & Slack, N. 2004. Supply chain paradigms. In S. New and R. Westbrook (Eds.), Understanding supply chains: Concepts, critiques and futures: 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J.L. & Jones, G.E. 1997. Process oriented supplier development: Building the capability for change. International Journal of Purchasing Materials and Supply Management, 33: 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. 2000. Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human Relations, 53: 771–806.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. 2003. Researching organizational practice through action research: Case studies and design choices. Organizational Research Methods, 6: 383–403.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Insitute for Public Policy Research 2004. Race equality—The benefits for responsible business, London: Insitute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L. 2002. Network learning: Exploring learning by interorganisational networks. Human Relations, 55: 427–453

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D.R., Ragatz, G.L. & Hughley, S. 1999. Supplier development from the minority supplier's perspective. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fall: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R.C., Cousins, P.D. & Notman, D.M. 1996. Beyond vendor assessment: Relationship assessment programmes. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2: 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. 2001. Organizational learning in supplier networks. In M. Diekes, A. Antal, J. Child & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational knowledge and learning: 699–714. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., Bentgtsson, L., Henriksson, K. & Sparks, J. 1998. The interorganisational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organisation Science, 9: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Policy Group. 2002. Supplier Diversity—The case of immigrant and ethnic minority enterprises. Background paper prepared for the Transatlantic Round Table on Supplier Diversity, Brussels, 15 January 2002.

  • Pearson, J.N., Fawcett, S.E. & Cooper, A. 1993. Challenges and approaches to purchasing from minority-owned firms: A longitudinal examination. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, L. & Morrisey, B. 2004. Buyer-supplier relationships in small firms: The use of social factors to manage relationships. Lancaster University Management School, working paper 042.

  • Ram, M. & Jones, T. 1998. Ethnic minorities in business. Small Business Research Trust. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., Smallbone, D. & Linneker, B. 2002. Assessing the Potential of Supplier Diversity Initiatives as a Means of Promoting Diversification among Ethnic Minority Businesses in the UK. Research Report, Small Business Service.

  • Ram, M. & Smallbone, D. 2003. Supplier diversity initiatives and the diversification of ethnic minority businesses in the UK, Policy Studies, 24: 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. 1994. Purchasing power. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 1: 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. and Ram, M. Forthcoming. Supplier diversity and minority business enterprise development: Case study experience of three US multinationals. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

  • Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince, R. 2004. Action learning and organisational learning: Power, politics and emotion in organisations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1: 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, R. 2001. Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54: 1325–1351.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. 1998. Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7: 225–246.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000) Communities of practice? The organisational frontier. Harvard Business Review, January–February: 139–145.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monder Ram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theodorakopoulos, N., Ram, M., Shah, M. et al. Experimenting with Supply Chain Learning (SCL): Supplier Diversity and Ethnic Minority Businesses. Entrepreneurship Mgt. 1, 461–478 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4773-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4773-8

Keywords

Navigation