Insulin receptor signaling mediates APP processing and β-amyloid accumulation without altering survival in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Stöhr, O., Schilbach, K., Moll, L. et al. AGE (2013) 35: 83. doi:10.1007/s11357-011-9333-2
- 797 Views
In brains from patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), expression of insulin receptor (IR), insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), and insulin receptor substrate proteins is downregulated. A key step in the pathogenesis of AD is the accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleavage products, β-amyloid (Aβ)1-42 and Aβ1–40. Recently, we and others have shown that central IGF-1 resistance reduces Aβ accumulation as well as Aβ toxicity and promotes survival. To define the role of IR in this context, we crossed neuron-specific IR knockout mice (nIR−/−) with Tg2576 mice, a well-established mouse model of an AD-like pathology. Here, we show that neuronal IR deficiency in Tg2576 (nIR−/−Tg2576) mice leads to markedly decreased Aβ burden but does not rescue premature mortality of Tg2576 mice. Analyzing APP C-terminal fragments (CTF) revealed decreased α-/β-CTFs in the brains of nIR−/−Tg2576 mice suggesting decreased APP processing. Cell based experiments showed that inhibition of the PI3-kinase pathway suppresses endosomal APP cleavage and decreases α- as well as β-secretase activity. Deletion of only one copy of the neuronal IGF-1R partially rescues the premature mortality of Tg2576 mice without altering total amyloid load. Analysis of Tg2576 mice expressing either a dominant negative or constitutively active form of forkhead box-O (FoxO)1 did not reveal any alteration of amyloid burden, APP processing and did not rescue premature mortality in these mice. Thus, our findings identified IR signaling as a potent regulator of Aβ accumulation in vivo. But exclusively decreased IGF-1R expression reduces AD-associated mortality independent of β-amyloid accumulation and FoxO1-mediated transcription.
KeywordsInsulin receptorInsulin-like growth factor-1 receptorβ-AmyloidAlzheimer’s diseaseTg2576 mice
Patients suffering from type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have a two- to threefold increased relative risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as the most common cause of dementia (Ott et al. 1996, 1999). This might be explained by vascular complications of T2DM leading to neurodegeneration (Lovestone 1999). Alternatively, neuronal resistance for insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) might represent a molecular link between T2DM and AD, characterizing AD as a “brain type” or “type 3” diabetes (de la Monte et al. 2006; Kroner 2009; Lovestone 1999; Pilcher 2006; Steen et al. 2005). In line with this hypothesis, insulin receptor (IR) and IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling (IIS) is markedly disturbed in the central nervous system (CNS) of AD patients (Frolich et al. 1998, 1999; Moloney et al. 2008, 2010). Detailed post-mortem investigation of brains from AD patients revealed a substantially downregulated expression of IR, IGF-1R (Rivera et al. 2005; Steen et al. 2005), and insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins (Moloney et al. 2010; Rivera et al. 2005; Steen et al. 2005). Similar changes in the IIS have been reported in animals fed a high fat diet (Ho et al. 2004) suggesting that decreased IR/IGF-1R signaling might be the common molecular basis of both, T2DM and AD. In contrast, type 2 diabetic patients with AD accumulate less β-amyloid (Aβ) compared with non-diabetic AD patients (Craft 2009) raising the question, whether changes in IIS are cause, consequence, or maybe even compensatory counterregulation to disease.
The probably most important pathological hallmark of AD is Aβ accumulation. Aβ consists of different peptides evolving from cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), mainly occurring in two lengths: Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42. These peptides are prone to aggregate and particular the Aβ oligomers are cytotoxic and most likely the molecular basis of neurodegeneration in AD (Crews and Masliah 2010).
In Caenorhabditis elegans, the DAF-2 pathway (ortholog to the mammalian IIS) controls longevity (Finch and Ruvkun 2001) in a DAF-16 dependent manner. DAF-16 encodes a forkhead transcription factor (Lin et al. 1997; Ogg et al. 1997), which translocates into the nucleus (Lee et al. 2001) and modulates transcription when DAF-2 signaling is abrogated. Cohen and coworkers showed that knocking down DAF-2 in C. elegans expressing Aβ1–42 reduces Aβ toxicity (Cohen et al. 2006). This effect was mediated by two downstream transcription factors, DAF-16, and HSF-1 facilitating two different molecular mechanisms of detoxification: The first detoxification pathway leads to disaggregation and degradation of the toxic oligomers. The second mechanism mediates the formation of low toxic, high molecular weight aggregates from highly toxic small molecular weight aggregates, positively regulated by DAF-16 (Aβ hyperaggregation). Recently, Aβ hyperaggregation has been observed as cytoprotective mechanism in IGF-1 resistant mouse models of AD (Cohen et al. 2009) suggesting that Insulin/IGF-1→forkhead box-O (FoxO) transmitted signals influence Aβ proteotoxicity and possibly thereby survival. Thus, IIS in the brain might represent a regulatory pathway of protein turnover and aggregation, which determines lifespan, at least in models of certain neurodegenerative diseases.
In order to test this hypothesis, we generated mice deficient for either both copies of the neuronal IR or one copy of the neuronal IGF-1R as well as mice expressing a dominant negative or a constitutively active mutant of FoxO1. These mice were crossed with Tg2576 mice, a well-established mouse model of an AD-like pathology overexpressing the Swedish mutant of APP. In rodents and humans, increased APP expression is associated with decreased life expectancy and an AD-like pathology suggesting that pathways influencing Aβ production or Aβ toxicity might lead to increased lifespan and/or altered Aβ accumulation/Aβ aggregation.
Here, we show that neuronal IR deficiency leads to decreased Aβ accumulation at least partially caused by decreased APP processing, but without influencing survival of Tg2576 mice. In contrast, haploinsufficiency for the IGF-1R significantly improved survival of Tg2576 mice but did not diminish Aβ burden. However, neither FoxO mutant rescued the premature mortality of Tg2576 mice nor altered total Aβ accumulation suggesting that the effects mediated via IR or IGF-1R are independent of FoxO1.
Material and methods
Animals, breeding, and genotyping
Tg2576 mice overexpressing the Swedish mutation of human APP695 (APPSW) were purchased from Taconic Corporate (Hudson, NY, USA) in a B6/SJL background. Since the genetic background of Tg2576 mice might influence mortality (Carlson et al. 1997), we used the APPSW model from Taconic in a B6/SJL background and crossed these mice back for three generations in a C57BL/6 background. Due to this approach, we obtained in all four intercrossed strains (nIR−/−, nIGF-1R+/−, FoxO1ADA, and FoxO1DN) similar mortality rates of Tg2576 mice as described in the literature avoiding excessive mortality (El Khoury et al. 2007; Matsubara et al. 2003; Nathan et al. 2005). IGF-1Rlox/+ and IRlox/lox mice were generated and genotyped as described previously (Bruning et al. 2000; Stachelscheid et al. 2008) and crossed with synapsin-Cre (Syn-Cre) mice to achieve neuron-specific deletion. Mice which did not express APPSW or Syn-Cre served as controls. nIR−/−, nIGF-1R+/−, FoxO1ADA, FoxO1DN, and Syn-Cre mice used for breeding were all on a pure C57BL/6 background.
Two transgenic mice expressing different FoxO1 mutants have been generated: (1) FoxO1ADA, which is constitutively nuclear localized due to mutation of T24 and S316 to A and S253 to D (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The cDNA of the FoxO1ADA mutant was subcloned into the rosa26locus. Since this locus is ubiquitously expressed, the sequence of the FoxO1ADA is separated by a loxP sites flanked stop cassette (Supplementary Fig. 1b). (2) FoxO1DN (Supplementary Fig. 1a), which is transactivation domain deleted and acts dominant negative. This mutant was cloned into the rosa26locus as well (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In order to get specific neuronal expression, both FoxO1 mutant strains were crossed with Syn-Cre mice.
Animals were housed in a 12-h light–dark cycle (07:00 on and 19:00 off) and were fed a standard rodent diet (89% dry matter, 22.5% crude protein, 5% crude fat, 4.5% crude fibre, 6.5% crude ash, 50.5% nitrogen free extracts, and a standard amount of different minerals, amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements; breeding diet #1314, Altromin, Lage, Germany). All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the German Laws for Animal Protection and were approved by the local animal care committee and the Bezirksregierung Köln.
Brains were lysed in buffer (50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 M NaF, 17 μg/ml Aprotinine, 2 mM Benzanidine, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 mM Na3VO4) using a polytron. Protein expression was determined from whole-brain lysates (50–100 μg) dissolved in Laemmli buffer and resolved on 7.5%, 10% or 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels. Proteins were transferred to PVDF; membranes were blocked with 5% Western blot blocking solution and incubated with the appropriate antisera.
Following primary antibodies were used: anti-insulin receptor β-subunit, anti-A disintegrin and metalloprotease-10/-17 (ADAM-10/-17), anti-flotillin-1 (C-2), anti-Rab5 (D-11), anti-TACE (C15; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), anti-actin (MP Biomedicals, Ohio, USA), anti-β-site APP cleaving enzyme (BACE), Aβ, anti-insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE; Chemicon International/Upstate/Millipore, MA, USA), anti-proteinkinase B (PKB/AKT), anti-phospho-PKBSer473 (AKT), anti-extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)-1/-2, anti-phospho-ERK-1/-2Thr202/Tyr204, anti-glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3α/β, anti-GSK-3β, anti-phospho-GSK-3α/βSer9/Ser21, anti-APP, anti-IGF-1R (Cell Signaling Technology Inc, MA, USA), anti-α/β C-terminal fragments (α/βCTF; Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), anti-6E10 (Aβ1–17; Covance, NJ, USA), anti-presenilin 1 (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA), anti-eGFP (D51; Cell signaling Technology Inc, MA, USA), anti-FoxO1 (L27, 29H4; Cell Signaling Technology Inc, MA, USA). Detection of Aβ oligomers was performed as described previously (Lesne et al. 2006). For dot blot analysis, samples used for the Western blot analysis (10 μg total protein) were directly applied to the membrane, air dried, and blocked with 5% nonfat milk followed by incubation with antibody A11 (Invitrogen), an antibody that specifically recognizes the oligomeric form of Aβ. Secondary antibodies anti-Mouse-IgG and anti-Rabbit-IgG were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany.
Metabolic characterization, glucose, and insulin tolerance tests
Mice were weighed weekly beginning at weaning in week 3 until performance of glucose and insulin tolerance tests in weeks 10 and 11. From week 12, blood glucose and weight were measured every 4 weeks.
For insulin tolerance tests animals were starved overnight (16 h) and injected with 0.75 U/kg body weight of human insulin (Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) into the peritoneal cavity. Blood glucose levels were measured in blood collected from the tail tip immediately before, and 15, 30, and 60 min after injection. Blood glucose measurements were performed using a blood glucose meter (GlucoMen, A. Menarini diagnostics, Berlin-Chemie, Neuss, Germany). Results were expressed as percentage of initial blood glucose concentration.
For glucose tolerance tests mice were starved overnight (16 h). Animals were injected with glucose (2 g/kg body weight) into the peritoneal cavity. Glucose levels were determined in blood collected from the tail tip immediately before, and 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after the injection using a glucose meter.
α- and β-secretase assays were performed with SensoLyte 520 TACE Activity Fluorimetric Assay Kit and SensoLyte beta-Secretase Fluorimetric Assay Kit as described by the manufacturer (Anaspec). Twenty micrograms of protein from crude cell lysate homogenate were used per experiment. Experiments were done in duplicates with n = 3. Measurements were performed in 96-well plates (nunc) in a Mithras LB 940 platereader (Berthold Technologies). β-Secretase activity of freshly isolated hippocampi was measured following the manufacturers protocol at 535-nm emission (#FP002, R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
β-Amyloid1–40 and β-amyloid1–42 ELISA
Amyloid was extracted using 5 M guanidine HCl in 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0. Then ELISAs of βA1–40/1–42 were performed following the manufacturers protocol (#KHB3481/3441, Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
We used 5 mg cell lysate to perform one sucrose gradient. Cells were grown on 15 cm cell culture plates and were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 (Applichem) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing complete protease inhibitor (Roche). Cells were homogenized in a loose fitting potter with 40 strokes. Cell debris and nuclei were pelleted afterwards (1,000 g, 10 min, 4°C). Protein concentration was measured using Bradford assay and the volume containing 5 mg of protein was adjusted to 500 μl with lysis buffer. Final lysate was mixed with an equal volume of 85% sucrose in TBS. The mix was overlaid with 3 ml 35% and 1 ml 5% sucrose in 5 ml centrifuge tubes (Beckman). After centrifugation at max. 240,000×g for 17 h (Ti55 rotor, Beckman Ultracentrifuge), we took 500-μl fractions from top to bottom. All steps were performed at 4°C.
For secretase inhibition the following inhibitors were used: α-secretase 20 μM TAPI-2 (Enzo LifeSciences, Loerrach, Germany), β-secretase 10 μM β-secretase inhibitor II (BioVision Research Products, California USA), γ-secretase 0.2 μM III-31C (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). For inhibition of PI3K LY 294002, 100 μM was used.
To quantify the changes in optical density, we used the software AIDA (Version 4.00.027, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany). For statistical analysis of the different study groups unpaired Student’s t test was performed. Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05. For Kaplan–Meier analysis, the XLSTAT-Life software, a Microsoft Excel add-in (www.xlstat.com) was used. For comparison of the different study groups, Wilcoxon rank tests were performed. Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05.
Neuronal insulin receptor deletion does not influence survival of Tg2576 mice
Recent data suggest that brain-specific IGF-1 resistance increases longevity (Freude et al. 2009; Kappeler et al. 2008; Taguchi et al. 2007). Furthermore, decreased IGF-1 signaling reduces Aβ toxicity in worms and mice (Cohen et al. 2006, 2009). Currently, there are limited data available elaborating the role of neuronal IR signaling in respect to longevity and Aβ pathology in vivo.
Neuronal insulin receptor deletion reduces Aβ accumulation in Tg2576 mice
Previous investigations demonstrated that IR/IGF-1R-mediated signals increase APP α- and β-cleavage in cultured cells (Adlerz et al. 2007; Costantini et al. 2006). We therefore determined the abundance of βCTF (C-terminal fragment) and αCTF in the CNS of nIR−/− mice and respective controls (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, α/βCTFs were reduced in nIR−/−Tg2576 compared with Tg2576 mice, while APP levels were unchanged (Fig. 2a). These data indicate that the reduced Aβ accumulation observed in nIR−/−Tg2576 mice might at least partially result from decreased APP processing (Fig. 2a).
In order to analyze whether reduced expression of the different secretases accounts for altered APP cleavage in nIR−/−Tg2576 mice, we investigated protein levels of the BACE-1 which acts as a β-secretase catalyzing the rate-limiting step of Aβ generation (Fig. 2f). However, since no changes of BACE-1 expression were detectable comparing nIR−/−Tg2576 mice and Tg2576 mice, BACE-1 activity might be reduced in nIR−/−Tg2576 mice compared with Tg2576 mice.
PI3-Kinase signaling regulates endosomal APP processing
As described previously, we detected APP CTFs exclusively in the endosomal fraction of wild-type SHSY5Y (Fig. 3b) (Marks and Berg 2010). Surprisingly, CTF appearance is completely abolished after treatment with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (Fig. 3b). To further elucidate the role of IRS-2 in formation of CTFs, we analyzed siIRS-2 cells with and without LY294002 treatment. Interestingly, CTF expression in untreated siIRS-2 cells is reduced compared with untreated wild-type cells (Fig. 3b). However, treatment with the PI3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 completely blocks CTF generation (Fig. 3b) whereas APP expression and traffcking remained unchanged (Fig. 3c). These findings suggest that PI3K activated by IRS-2 promotes CTF formation. Previous work indicated that endosomal APP procession is mainly mediated via α-secretase activity (Marks and Berg 2010). Therefore, we analyzed the effect of α-, β-, and γ- secretase inhibitors on endogenous CTF formation and protein abundance of BACE-1, ADAM-10, and TACE in the different membrane fractions (Fig. 3d). Interestingly, only the α-secretase inhibitor TAPI-2 (Enzo LifeSciences, Lörrach, Germany, 20 μM final concentration) reduced CTF formation whereas the β-secretase inhibitor ( 10 μM final concentration; β-secretase inhibitor II, BioVision Research Products, California, USA) and γ-secretase inhibitor (III-31C, Sigma, 0.2 μM final concentration) had no effect (Fig. 3c) suggesting that endosomal APP procession is mediated mainly via the two possible α-secretases ADAM-10 and/or TACE (Jacobsen et al. 2010). However, Western blot analysis of BACE-1, ADAM-10, and TACE did not show any differences between wild-type and siIRS-2 cells (Fig. 3e). Since the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 inhibits CTF formation in wild-type SHSY5Y and siIRS-2 cells, we treated SHSY5Y cells with LY294002 or control medium followed by α-/β-secretase activity measurements. At all time points α- as well as β-secretase activity was significantly reduced in PI3K inhibitor treated SHSY5Y cells compared with controls (Fig. 3f). Thus, PI3K mediates activation of α-/β-secretase explaining at least partially the reduced occurrence of APP CTFs in insulin and IGF-1 resistant brains of Tg2576 mice. In order to confirm that IR/IGF-1R signaling is involved in regulating β-secretase activity in vivo, we isolated hippocampi from mice being neuron specifically deficient for the IR (nIR) or the IGF-1R (nIGF-1R) and measured β-secretase activity. Consistent with our in vitro data, β-secretase activity was significantly reduced in hippocampi of both conditional knockout models (Fig. 3g) suggesting that IR- and IGF-1R-mediated signals modulate β-secretase activity.
Neuron-specific deletion of one IGF-1R copy partially rescues premature mortality in Tg2576 mice
Heterozygosity of IGF-1R in neurons does not alter total Aβ burden but decreases Aβ oligomers in APPSW overexpressing mice
Analysis of α- and βCTF in hippocampi from nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 mice aged 60 weeks (Fig. 5b) revealed a slight but visible reduction of α and βCTF in the hippocampus while total APP expression remained unchanged (Fig. 5b, e). In contrast to nIR−/−Tg2576 (Fig. 2b) and nIGF-1R−/−Tg2576 (Freude et al. 2009) mice, hippocampi of nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 mice showed no reduction of total Aβ burden even in 60 weeks old mice (Fig. 5c, d). According to previous studies in IGF-1-resistant models (Cohen et al. 2006, 2009), low molecular weight Aβ oligomers occur less in nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 mice compared with Tg2576 mice (Fig. 5c) possibly suggesting Aβ hyperaggregation as molecular mechanism of detoxification in these mice (Cohen et al. 2006, 2010, 2009). However, the reduced Aβ load and low molecular weight Aβ oligomer concentration in the absence of a survival benefit in nIR−/−Tg2576 mice might argue against a predominant role of Aβ toxicity as leading cause of death in Tg2576 mice. Our data point towards a role of IGF-1 resistance in mediating cellular stress defense which is not transmitted via decreased IR signaling.
FoxO expression in the rodent brain
FoxO transcription factors act as downstream target of the IIS pathway. So far, there are four different members of the mammalian FoxO-family known: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4, and FoxO6. Apart from FoxO4, all of them are expressed in the murine brain (Hoekman et al. 2006). Previous studies in worms have shown that lifespan is determined by the IIS pathway and this effect is predominantly mediated via the neuronal IIS (Kenyon et al. 1993; Wolkow et al. 2000). Data obtained in C. elegans suggest that the Aβ hyperaggregation observed in IGF-1 resistant models is induced via FoxO-mediated transcription.
Determination of FoxO1, FoxO3a, and FoxO6 expression in murine brain using real-time PCR
x-fold ± SEM
x-fold ± SEM
x-fold ± SEM
1.0 ± 0.04
1.0 ± 0.03
1.0 ± 0.22
1.8 ± 0.27
1.1 ± 0.18
1.0 ± 0.49
1.0 ± 0.25
1.0 ± 0.05
0.5 ± 0.09
1.1 ± 0.15
1.3 ± 0.13
0.9 ± 0.34
0.9 ± 0.08
1.6 ± 0.27
0.6 ± 0.22
0.9 ± 0.09
1.4 ± 0.19
0.9 ± 0.27
Determination of FoxO1, FoxO3a, and FoxO6 expression in murine brain using real-time PCR
x-fold ± SEM
x-fold ± SEM
p vs. FoxO1
x-fold ± SEM
p vs. FoxO1
p vs. FoxO3a
1.0 ± 0.04
1.0 ± 0.03
0.5 ± 0.11
1.0 ± 0.16
0.6 ± 0.11
0.3 ± 0.14
1.0 ± 0.27
1.0 ± 0.05
0.2 ± 0.04
1.0 ± 0.15
1.2 ± 0.12
0.5 ± 0.17
1.0 ± 0.09
1.7 ± 0.29
0.3 ± 0.12
1.0 ± 0.10
1.5 ± 0.21
0.5 ± 0.15
Overall FoxO1 and FoxO3 expression in whole brain was significantly higher than the expression of FoxO6. In the hippocampus, FoxO1 mRNA concentration was 1.6-fold higher compared with FoxO3a and 3.1-fold higher compared with FoxO6 mRNA levels. In the different cortical regions, FoxO3a was higher expressed than the other FoxOs reaching significance for parietal and occipital cortex compared with both, FoxO1 and FoxO6. Thus, FoxO1 seems to be the major FoxO transcription factor in the hippocampus, whereas FoxO3 seems to be the predominant FoxO species in the cortex. Since our genetic approach mainly alters expression of IR or IGF-1R in the hippocampus and FoxO1 seemed to be the predominant FoxO variant in this particular region, we decided to investigate the role of FoxO1 in the context of APP processing, Aβ accumulation, and APPsw-induced mortality.
We therefore created two different mouse lines expressing neuron-specific two different mutants of the FoxO1 transcription factor. The first mutant is FoxO1ADA, which is constitutively nuclear expressed due to mutation of T24 and S316 to A and S256 to D. The cDNA of the FoxO1ADA mutant was subcloned into the rosa26locus. Since this locus is ubiquitously expressed, the sequence of the FoxoO1ADA was separated by a loxP sites flanked stop cassette (so called FoxO1ADA mice). Furthermore, the FoxO1ADA cDNA is followed by an eGFP sequence separated via an internal ribosome entry site (for targeting strategy, see Supplementary Fig. 1). The second FoxO1 mutant is transactivation domain deleted (FoxO1DN) and acts dominant negative. This mutant was cloned into the rosa26locus using the same targeting strategy (Supplementary Fig. 1). In order to get neuron-specific expression, these mice were crossed with Syn-Cre mice.
Neuron-specific FoxO1ADA as well as FoxO1DN expressing animals were viable and lived at least 90 weeks (data not shown). We crossed both the FoxO1ADA and FoxO1DN mice into a Tg2576 background and analyzed glucose metabolism, Aβ-pathology, and mortality.
Expression of a constitutively active FoxO1 mutant does not rescue mortality or Aβ burden of Tg2576 mice
To exclude any influence of possibly affected glucose metabolism, insulin and glucose tolerance tests were performed which revealed no differences between FoxO1ADATg2576 and Tg2576 mice (Fig. 6b). During the study period of 60 weeks, body weight and blood glucose levels in female mice remaind unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 6) whereas the only two male FoxO1ADATg2576 mice were significantly smaller and had lower blood glucose levels compared with Tg2576 littermates (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Basal expression and phosphorylation of key mediators of the IR/IGF-1R signaling cascade were unchanged in all genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 6c).
Protein expression of APP as well as the cleavage products βCTF and αCTF did not differ between FoxO1ADATg2576 and Tg2576 mice (Fig. 6d). Also, total Aβ load and occurrence of Aβ amyloid oligomers analyzed in the SDS-soluble fraction remained unchanged in the respective genotypes (Fig. 6e, f). These data suggest that FoxO1-mediated transcription in FoxO1ADATg2576 mice does not explain the phenotypes observed either in nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576, nIGF-1R−/−Tg2576 (Freude et al. 2009), or nIR−/−Tg2576 mice.
Expression of a dominant negative FoxO1 mutant does not influence mortality or Aβ burden of Tg2576 mice
Kaplan–Meier analysis of dominant negative FoxO1 mutants in a Tg2576 background revealed no difference in mortality of Tg2576 and FoxO1DNTg2576 mice (Fig. 7a). Thus, no protection against the premature mortality of Tg2576 mice was detected.
To exclude any influence of altered glucose metabolism, insulin and glucose tolerance tests were performed which revealed no differences in glucose metabolism between FoxO1DNTg2576 and Tg2576 mice (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, body weight and blood glucose levels in both genders (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b) remained unchanged during the whole study. Protein expression and phosphoylation of Akt and Erk-1/-2 showed no difference between the genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 7c).
Protein expression of APP as well as the cleavage products βCTF and αCTF did not differ between FoxO1DNTg2576 and Tg2576 mice (Fig. 7d). Total Aβ load and Aβ amyloid oligomers concentrations in the SDS-soluble fraction remained unchanged in the Tg2576 and FoxO1DNTg2576 hippocampi (Fig. 7e, f).
Increased expression of human APP in rodents (Chishti et al. 2001; Freude et al. 2009; Hsiao et al. 1995; Moechars et al. 1999; Willuweit et al. 2009), flies (Greeve et al. 2004; Rajendran et al. 2008), or humans is associated with premature mortality and an Alzheimer-like pathology (Isacson et al. 2002; Rovelet-Lecrux et al. 2006; Sleegers et al. 2006; Wisniewski et al. 1985). There have been numerous reports in mice showing that overexpression of human APP or mutant human APP leads to increased mortality in young mice even before the onset of visible Alzheimer-like pathology or neurodegeneration (El Khoury et al. 2007; Hsiao et al. 1995). However, preventing Aβ production or increasing Aβ clearance from the brain reduces mortality in APP overexpressing mice or flies suggesting that Aβ proteotoxicity is at least partially responsible for the premature lethality in case of APP overexpression (El Khoury et al. 2007; Greeve et al. 2004; Leissring et al. 2003; Matsubara et al. 2003; Meilandt et al. 2009; Nathan et al. 2005; Rajendran et al. 2008). In humans, the APP gene is located on chromosome 21 and APP is overexpressed in patients with Down’s syndrome (trisomy 21). Accordingly, Down’s syndrome is associated with increased mortality (Baird and Sadovnick 1988; Yang et al. 2002) even compared with people with other mental retardations (Day et al. 2005; Hermon et al. 2001; Strauss and Eyman 1996). In older age, AD is one of the leading causes of death in trisomy 21. Even isolated duplication of the APP gene causes AD and is associated with premature death (Cabrejo et al. 2006; Rovelet-Lecrux et al. 2006; Sleegers et al. 2006).
The DAF-2 signaling pathway in C. elegans (ortholog to the mammalian IR/IGF-1Rs) has been identified as possible modulator of Aβ proteotoxicity without altering total Aβ burden. Cohen et al. have shown that knocking down DAF-2 in C. elegans expressing human Aβ1–42 reduces Aβ toxicity (Cohen et al. 2006). This effect was mediated by DAF-16, and HSF-1. DAF-16 mediates the formation of low toxic, high molecular weight aggregates from highly toxic small molecular weight aggregates (Aβ hyperaggregation) (Cohen et al. 2006). Recently, Aβ hyperaggregation has been identified as mechanism of Aβ detoxification in an IGF-1 resistant mouse model of AD (Cohen et al. 2009). In this study, IGF-1R+/− mice were crossed with mice expressing the Swedish mutant of APP and the ΔE9 variant of presenilin 1. These mice were protected from cognitive decline and neurodegeneration usually observed in this Alzheimer model suggesting that partial IGF-1 resistance decreases Aβ toxicity possibly in combination with increased cellular stress resistance in response to Aβ (Cohen et al. 2009; Douglas and Dillin 2010; Killick et al. 2009). In addition, neuron-specific knockout of both copies of the IGF-1R gene rescues premature mortality and decreases Aβ load in Tg2576 mice (Freude et al. 2009).
Here, we show that neuron-specific deletion of only one copy of the IGF-1R reduces premature mortality of Tg2576 mice and decreases the concentration of Aβ oligomers without altering total Aβ load or APP expression. These data reinforce the role of IGF-1R signaling in the context of proteotoxicity suggesting IGF-1R signaling represents a regulatory pathway of protein turnover, and aggregation as suggested by previous studies (Cohen et al. 2006, 2009).
In mammals, the IIS is divided into the IR and IGF-1R signaling pathway. To specifically define the role of IRs in this context, we generated neuron-specific IR knockout mice and crossed them with Tg2576 mice. Surprisingly, we found that in contrast to complete deletion of neuronal IGF-1R (Freude et al. 2009), IR deficiency does not protect Tg2576 mice from premature death. Interestingly, Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 concentrations were significantly lower in nIR−/−Tg2576 compared with Tg2576 mice but not in nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 mice. These data might suggest that total Aβ concentrations are not responsible for the previously described rescue of the premature mortality mediated via reduced expression of the IGF-1Rs. This in turn indicates that quality of Aβ aggregates might be specifically influenced by IGF-1R but not IR. Recent data suggest that concentrations of oligomeric Aβ are the most important cytotoxic Aβ species, we therefore investigated concentrations of oligomeric Aβ in our mutant mice. Interestingly, we observed a reduction of oligomeric Aβ in nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 and nIR−/−Tg2576 mice compared with Tg2676 mice excluding that concentrations of oligomeric Aβ alone are responsible for the difference between the effect of IGF-1R-and IR-mediated signals on premature death of Tg2576 mice. Our data support a hypothesis that IGF-mediated signals does not only reduce oligomeric Aβ concentration and toxicity as previously shown (Cohen et al. 2006, 2010, 2009) but also influences cellular response to proteotoxicity via so far unknown mechanisms.
Interestingly, both deletion of the IR or the IGF-1R decreases APPsw processing in vivo. In order to further analyze the role of IIS signaling for endogenous APP processing, we generated IRS-2 knockdown cells. Previous work in SHSY5Y cells as well as in primary cultured neurons suggested that chronic treatment with IGF-1 induces a shift from TrkA to p75NTR expression as seen in aging brains (Costantini et al. 2006). This switch might increase β-secretase activity indirectly by activation of neuronal sphingomyelinase which is responsible for the liberation of ceramides acting as second messenger (Puglielli 2008) leading to stabilization of BACE-1 (Puglielli et al. 2003). This process has been proposed to be responsible for IGF-1’s effect on Aβ generation. However, using SHSY5Y cells, we could show that IRS-2 knockdown influences α- and β-secretase activity via PI3-kinase pathway independent of secretase expression suggesting that IRS-2-mediated signals act on multiple levels on endogenous APP processing. Since IRS-2 might mediate not only insulin’s or IGF-1’s intracellular effects, we analyzed the impact of neuronal IRs and IGF-1Rs signaling on β-secretase activity in vivo. According to our in vitro experiments β-secretase activity was decreased in hippocamal lysates isolated from nIR−/− and IGF-1R−/− mice. This might explain the decreased Aβ burden observed in nIGF-1R−/−Tg2576 (Freude et al. 2009) and the nIR−/−Tg2576 mice reported here. However, as proven by the analysis of the nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 mice, total Aβ burden alone does not explain the survival differences observed between nIGF-1R−/−Tg2576 or nIGF-1R+/−Tg2576 and nIR−/−Tg2576 mice.
In order to gain further insights into the molecular mechanism how IGF-1 signaling influences survival and APP processing in vivo, we took advantage of the observation in C. elegans that Aβ hyperaggregation and detoxification depends of DAF-16 target genes (Cohen et al. 2006). The mammalian orthologs to DAF-16 are the FoxO transcription factors.
FoxO transcription factors act as downstream target of the insulin/IGF-1 cascade, which down-regulates FoxO activity via Akt-mediated phosphorylation, in turn triggering nuclear exclusion and degradation of the FoxO transcription factors. There are four different members of the mammalian FoxO-family: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4, and FoxO6. Apart from FoxO6, which is exclusively expressed in the brain, and FoxO4, which has not been found in brain (Hoekman et al. 2006; Jacobs et al. 2003), the other FoxO transcription factors are found ubiquitously. Because of the shared DNA-binding domain, FoxOs are expected to bind to similar DNA sequences (Furuyama et al. 2000). Thus, all FoxOs might be able to regulate the same set of genes through binding to this sequence. Indeed, large overlap in gene expression is observed when comparing the transcriptional activity during overexpression of the individual FoxOs. Functional specificity is most likely achieved via interaction with co-regulators (Burgering 2008). Since there are three different FoxOs generally expressed in rodent brain, we investigated the expression pattern of the three FoxOs in different brain regions. Interestingly, there are region-specific differences in FoxO expression. In the hippocampus, FoxO1 expression is nearly twice as high compared with FoxO3a, and even five times higher than FoxO6. However, in the frontal and parietal cortex, FoxO3a is significantly higher expressed in comparison to FoxO1 and FoxO6. Since the Cre transgenic mice used in the present study for all genetic manipulations expresses predominantly in the hippocampus, we asked the question whether FoxO1 has any influence of Aβ burden and survival. Therefore, we created mice expressing a dominant negative (FoxO1DN) and a constitutively active FoxO1 (FoxO1ADA). Our approach using the FoxO1DN and ADA mutants to inhibit or activate FoxO1-mediated transcription has been successfully used in previous studies and is well characterized (Adachi et al. 2007; Belgardt et al. 2008; Kitamura et al. 2007). Analysis of the FoxO1DN and FoxO1ADA in a Tg2576 background showed that activation or inhibition of FoxO1-mediated transcription does not explain the phenotypes of nIR−/−Tg2576, nIGF-1R−/−Tg2576, or nIGF-1+/−Tg2576 mice. Surprisingly, expression of FoxO1ADA in Tg2576 mice led to a so far unexplained excessive mortality. Thus, another pathway or one of the other FoxO transcription factors mediates the protective effect on overall survival observed in Tg2576 mice harboring either haploinsufficiency or homozygous deletion of the IGF-1R.
In summary, we have shown that (1) neuron-specific deletion of both copies of the IR and the IGF-1R (Freude et al. 2009) reduced APP processing and Aβ burden. (2) IR and IGF-1 receptor signaling regulates endosomal APP processing via PI3K dependent pathway. (3) Decreased IGF-1R but not IR expression reduces premature mortality in Tg2576 mice via a so far unknown mechanism not dependent on total Aβ load or the concentrations of soluble Aβ oligomers. (4) Neuronal FoxO1-mediated transcription does not explain the phenotypes observed either in nIR−/−Tg2576 or nIGF-1−/+Tg2576 mice.
We thank Prof. Dr. R. Wiesner for critical discussion of the data and the manuscript. This work was supported by the Alzheimer Forschungsinitiative e.V. (to MS # 08813) and the Else-Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung (to MS #2010_A93) and Köln Fortune (to MS and KS)