Tests of Homoscedasticity, Normality, and Missing Completely at Random for Incomplete Multivariate Data
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Test of homogeneity of covariances (or homoscedasticity) among several groups has many applications in statistical analysis. In the context of incomplete data analysis, tests of homoscedasticity among groups of cases with identical missing data patterns have been proposed to test whether data are missing completely at random (MCAR). These tests of MCAR require large sample sizes n and/or large group sample sizes n i , and they usually fail when applied to nonnormal data. Hawkins (Technometrics 23:105–110, 1981) proposed a test of multivariate normality and homoscedasticity that is an exact test for complete data when n i are small. This paper proposes a modification of this test for complete data to improve its performance, and extends its application to test of homoscedasticity and MCAR when data are multivariate normal and incomplete. Moreover, it is shown that the statistic used in the Hawkins test in conjunction with a nonparametric k-sample test can be used to obtain a nonparametric test of homoscedasticity that works well for both normal and nonnormal data. It is explained how a combination of the proposed normal-theory Hawkins test and the nonparametric test can be employed to test for homoscedasticity, MCAR, and multivariate normality. Simulation studies show that the newly proposed tests generally outperform their existing competitors in terms of Type I error rejection rates. Also, a power study of the proposed tests indicates good power. The proposed methods use appropriate missing data imputations to impute missing data. Methods of multiple imputation are described and one of the methods is employed to confirm the result of our single imputation methods. Examples are provided where multiple imputation enables one to identify a group or groups whose covariance matrices differ from the majority of other groups.
- Anderson, T.W., & Darling, D.A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 765–769. CrossRef
- Bentler, P.M., Kim, K.H., & Yuan, K.H. (2004). Testing homogeneity of covariances with infrequent missing data patterns. Unpublished Manuscript.
- David, F.N. (1939). On Neyman’s “smooth” test for goodness of fit: I. Distribution of the criterion Ψ2 when the hypothesis tested is true. Biometrika, 31, 191–199.
- Fisher, R.A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
- Hawkins, D.M. (1981). A new test for multivariate normality and homoscedasticity. Technometrics, 23, 105–110. CrossRef
- Hou, C.D. (2005). A simple approximation for the distribution of the weighted combination of non-independent or independent probabilities. Statistics and Probability Letters, 73, 179–187. CrossRef
- Jamshidian, M., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). ML estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data using complete data routines. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 21–41.
- Jamshidian, M., & Schott, J. (2007). Testing equality of covariance matrices when data are incomplete. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 4227–4239. CrossRef
- Kim, K.H., & Bentler, P.M. (2002). Tests of homogeneity of means and covariance matrices for multivariate incomplete data. Psychometrika, 67, 609–624. CrossRef
- Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 583–621. CrossRef
- Ledwina, T. (1994). Data-driven version of Neyman’s smooth test of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1000–1005. CrossRef
- Little, R.J.A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. CrossRef
- Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data (1st edn.). New York: Wiley.
- Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.
- Marhuenda, Y., Morales, D., & Pardo, M.C. (2005). A comparison of uniformity tests. Statistics, 39, 315–328. CrossRef
- Neyman, J. (1937). Smooth test for goodness of fit. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 20, 150–199.
- Rayner, J.C.W., & Best, D.J. (1990). Smooth tests of goodness of fit: An overview. International Statistical Review, 58, 9–17. CrossRef
- Rubin, D.B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592. CrossRef
- Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
- Scholz, F.W., & Stephens, M.A. (1987). K-sample Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 918–924. CrossRef
- Srivastava, M.S. (2002). Methods of multivariate statistics. New York: Wiley.
- Srivastava, M.S., & Dolatabadi, M. (2009). Multiple imputation and other resampling scheme for imputing missing observations. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1919–1937. CrossRef
- Thas, O., & Ottoy, J.-P. (2004). An extension of the Anderson-Darling k-sample test to arbitrary sample space partition sizes. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 74, 651–665. CrossRef
- Yuan, K.H. (2009). Normal distribution pseudo ML for missing data: With applications to mean and covariance structure analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1900–1918. CrossRef
- Yuan, K.H., Bentler, P.M., & Zhang, W. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Sociological Methods & Research, 34, 240–258. CrossRef
- Tests of Homoscedasticity, Normality, and Missing Completely at Random for Incomplete Multivariate Data
Volume 75, Issue 4 , pp 649-674
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- covariance structures
- k-sample test
- missing data
- multiple imputation
- nonparametric test
- structural equations
- test of homogeneity of covariances
- Industry Sectors