Purinergic Signalling

, 2:335

Alkaline Phosphatases

Structure, substrate specificity and functional relatedness to other members of a large superfamily of enzymes

Authors

    • Burnham Institute for Medical Research
Open AccessReview

DOI: 10.1007/s11302-005-5435-6

Cite this article as:
Millán, J.L. Purinergic Signalling (2006) 2: 335. doi:10.1007/s11302-005-5435-6

Abstract

Our knowledge of the structure and function of alkaline phosphatases has increased greatly in recent years. The crystal structure of the human placental isozyme has enabled us to probe salient features of the mammalian enzymes that differ from those of the bacterial enzymes. The availability of knockout mice deficient in each of the murine alkaline phosphatase isozymes has also given deep insights into their in vivo role. This has been particularly true for probing the biological role of bone alkaline phosphatase during skeletal mineralization. Due to space constraints this mini-review focuses exclusively on structural and functional features of mammalian alkaline phosphatases as identified by crystallography and probed by site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analysis. An emphasis is also placed on the substrate specificity of alkaline phosphatases, their catalytic properties as phosphohydrolases as well as phosphodiesterases and their structural and functional relatedness to a large superfamily of enzymes that includes nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase.

Key words

alkaline phosphatasescrystal structureshydrolaseshypophosphatasiaisozymesmodelingphysiological substratespyrophosphatasessite-directed mutagenesisstructure/function studies

Abbreviations

ADP

adenosine diphosphate

AMP

adenosine monophosphate

AP

alkaline phosphatase

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

cAMP

cyclic AMP

ECAP

Escherichia coli AP

GCAP

germ cell alkaline phosphatase

GPI

glycosylphosphatidylinositol

IAP

intestinal alkaline phosphatase

iPGM

cofactor-independent phosphoglycerate mutase

kcat

catalytic rate constant

Ki

inhibition constant

Km

Michaelis constant

NPP1

nucleosidetriphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase-1

Pi

inorganic phosphate

PLAP

placental alkaline phosphatase

PLP

pyridoxal-5-phosphate

pNPP

p-nitrophenylphosphate

PPi

inorganic pyrophosphate

TNAP

tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase

Vmax

maximal velocity

Wt

wild-type

Introduction

Alkaline phosphatases (APs; EC 3.1.3.1) occur widely in nature, and are found in many organisms from bacteria to man [1]. With few exceptions, APs are homodimeric enzymes and each catalytic site contains three metal ions, i.e., two Zn and one Mg, necessary for enzymatic activity. The enzymes catalyze the hydrolysis of monoesters of phosphoric acid and also catalyze a transphosphorylation reaction in the presence of large concentrations of phosphate acceptors. While the main features of the catalytic mechanism are conserved comparing mammalian and bacterial APs, mammalian APs have higher specific activity and Km values; have a more alkaline pH optimum; display lower heat stability; are membrane-bound and are inhibited by l-amino acids and peptides through an uncompetitive mechanism. These properties, however, differ noticeably among the different mammalian AP isozymes and are likely to reflect very different in vivo functions. Table 1 summarizes the nomenclature, tissue distribution and some of the functions of human and mouse AP isozymes. Importantly, APs have homology to a large number of other enzymes and are, thus, part of a superfamily of enzymes with some overlapping catalytic properties and substrate specificities. This mini-review will briefly point out some of the most salient structural features of mammalian APs and refer to their substrate specificity and homology to other members of the nucleoside pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family of isozymes with which APs synergize and overlap in function, particularly during skeletal mineralization. For more information on any aspect of APs, including their in vivo roles as defined by gene knockout studies, the reader is referred to a recent book covering in depth 25 years of progress in understanding the structure and function of mammalian APs [2].
Table 1

Summary of the gene nomenclature, accession numbers, common names, tissue distribution and function, if known, for the human and mouse alkaline phosphatase isozymes.

 

Accession numbers

Protein names

Common names, synonyms

Tissue distribution

Function

Human genes

     

ALPL

NM_000478

TNAP

Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase; TNSALP; “Bliver-bone-kidney type” AP

Developing nervous system, skeletal tissues, liver, kidney

Bone mineralization

ALPP

NM_001632

PLAP

Placental alkaline phosphatase; PLALP

Syncytiotrophoblast, a variety of tumors

Unknown

ALPP2

NM_031313

GCAP

Germ cell alkaline phosphatase, GCALP

Testis, malignant trophoblasts, testicular cancer

Unkown

ALPI

NM_001631

IAP

Intestinal alkaline phosphatase, IALP

gut, influenced by fat feeding and ABO status

Intestinal absorption?

Mouse genes

     

Akp2

NM_007431

TNAP

Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase; TNSALP; “liver-bone-kidney type” AP

Developing nervous system, skeletal tissues, liver, kidney

Bone mineralization

Akp3

NM_007432

IAP

Intestinal alkaline phosphatase, IALP

Gut

Fat absorption

Akp5

NM_007433

EAP

Embryonic alkaline phosphatase

preimplantation embryo, testis, gut

Early embryogenesis

Protein structure and functional domains

For many years the crystallographic coordinates of the Escherichia coli AP (ECAP) [3] molecule provided the only source of structural information on APs, but now the three-dimensional structure of the first mammalian AP, i.e., human placental AP (PLAP; 1EW2; http://pdbbeta.rcsb.org/pdb/) has been solved [4]. As had been predicted from sequence comparisons, the central core of PLAP, consisting of an extended β-sheet and flanking α-helices, is very similar to that of ECAP. The overall structure of PLAP is a dimer and each monomer contains 484 residues, four metal atoms, one phosphate ion, and 603 water molecules. The two monomers are related by a two-fold crystallographic axis (Figure 1). The surface of PLAP is poorly conserved with that of ECAP with only 8% residues in common. PLAP possesses additional secondary structure elements, comprising an N-terminal α-helix (residues 9 to 25), an α-helix and a β-strand in a highly divergent region (residues 208–280) and a different organization of the small β-sheet in domain 365–430. In the active site, only the residues that are essential for catalysis are preserved, i.e., the catalytic Ser, the three metal ion sites, M1 (occupied by Zn2+, also called Zn1), M2 (occupied by Zn2+; also called Zn2) and M3 (occupied by Mg2+) as well as their ligands, while most of the surrounding residues are different. Half of the enzyme surface corresponds to three clearly identifiable regions whose sequences largely vary among human APs, and are lacking in non-mammalian enzymes, i.e., the long N-terminal α-helix, an interfacial flexible loop known as the ‘crown domain’ and a fourth metal binding domain (M4). The availability of the PLAP structure facilitated modeling the human germ cell AP (GCAP), intestinal AP (IAP) and tissue-nonspecific AP (TNAP, a.k.a. liver/bone/kidney type AP) isozymes, revealing that all the novel features discovered in PLAP are conserved in those human isozymes as well [5]. The active site Ser is conserved in all species where an AP has been sequenced to-date.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11302-005-5435-6/MediaObjects/11302_2005_Article_5435_Fig1.jpg
Figure 1

Three-dimensional structure of PLAP. Overview of the structure of human PLAP from the crystallographic coordinates determined by Le Du et al. [4]. Monomer A is shown in ribbon representation and in cyan, while monomer B is shown in surface representation in yellow. Indicated are the active site metals, Zn1, Zn2 and Mg, the novel fourth metal site occupied by Ca, the crown domain and the amino terminal arm. The relative location of the GPI anchor on the processed enzyme is also indicated.

Structure/function studies comparing PLAP and the ECAP structure have found a conserved function for those residues that stabilize the active site Zn1, Zn2 and Mg metal ions, i.e., Asp42, His153, Ser155, Glu311, Asp316, His320, Asp357, His358, His360 and His432 [6] (Figure 2). However, while mutations at Zn2 or Mg sites have similar effects in PLAP and ECAP, the environment of the Zn1 ion in PLAP is less affected by substitutions than in ECAP. This reflects the fact that, as shown on Figure 2, residue Glu429 is strategically positioned at the roof of the active site cleft where it provides additional stabilization to the active site environment, so that Zn2+ cannot easily diffuse in or out of the PLAP molecule [6]. An additional non-catalytic metal-binding site M4 that appears to be occupied by calcium and that is not present in ECAP was revealed upon solving the PLAP 3D structure [4, 7]. This fourth metal is coordinated by carboxylates from Glu216, Glu270 and Asp285, by the carbonyl of Phe269 and a water molecule and this architecture is conserved in all human and mouse APs and presumably represents a novel feature common to all mammalian APs. However, the structural and functional significance of this new metal site remains to be established.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11302-005-5435-6/MediaObjects/11302_2005_Article_5435_Fig2.jpg
Figure 2

Comparison of the residues coordinating to the active site metals in PLAP and ECAP. The upper panels focus on the environment of the Zn1 and Zn2 metal sites and their ligands while the lower panels display the environment of the Mg metal site and its ligands. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. Green dotted lines denote metal-ligand interactions and hydrogen bonds. The figure is taken from Kozlenkov et al. [6] and is reproduced with permission from the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

All mammalian APs have five cysteine residues (Cys101, Cys121, Cys183, Cys467 and Cys474 in PLAP) per subunit, not homologous to any of the four cysteines in ECAP. They form two disulfide bonds, Cys121-Cys183 and Cys467-Cys474, whereas the Cys101 residue remains in free form [6]. The N-terminus of PLAP has an additional α-helix not present in the ECAP structure and its position is removed from the rest of the monomer, but it interacts with the second monomer with a buried surface area of 555 Å2, suggesting an involvement in enzyme dimerization. Recently, Hoylaerts et al. [8] have shown that the integrity of the N-terminal arm, and in particular of the α-helix comprising residues 10–25, represents a structural requirement for the active site to execute the intramolecular transition required during enzyme catalysis in both PLAP and TNAP.

The top flexible loop that constitutes the crown domain of PLAP is formed by the insertion of a 60-residue segment (366–430) from each monomer. It consists of two small interacting β-sheets, each composed of three parallel strands, and surrounded by six large and flexible loops containing a short α-helix [4]. This region displays the least degree of sequence conservation among mammalian APs and isozyme-specific properties, such as the characteristic uncompetitive inhibition [6, 912], their variable heat-stability [13], and their allosteric behavior [14] have all been attributed to residue 429 located on this crown domain (Figures 2 and 3). This domain may also mediate the interaction between APs and extracellular matrix proteins, such as collagens [13, 1517]. Another interesting structural feature of PLAP, with no counterpart in the ECAP structure, is Y367 (Figure 3). This residue is part of the subunit interface in the PLAP dimer, where it protrudes from one subunit and its hydroxyl group is located 6.1 Å from the phosphate and 3.1 Å from His432, which in turn chelates the zinc atom Zn1 in the active site of the other subunit. Kozlenkov et al. [6, 12] has shown that Y367, similar to residue 429, also plays a crucial role in determining the uncompetitive inhibition properties to the mammalian APs but very likely also the allosteric character of mammalian APs.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11302-005-5435-6/MediaObjects/11302_2005_Article_5435_Fig3.jpg
Figure 3

Location and environment of the Glu429 and Tyr367 residue. Upper panel ) Top view of the entrance to the active site, showing the position of the Y367 residue from one subunit (wireframe representation) in the immediate vicinity of the Glu429 residue of the other subunit (spacefill representation). Lower panel ) Detail of the active site entrance in spacefill representation showing the location of Glu429 relative to Zn1 and the active site PO43− in one subunit and the relative location of Tyr367 of the other subunit. The upper panel was taken from Kozlenkov et al. [6] and is reproduced with permission from the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

The monomer-monomer interface in PLAP has a strong hydrophobic character in contrast to that of ECAP. Less than 30% of the residues are involved in hydrogen-bonding interactions, which confer flexibility on the interface. Both the amino terminal arm and the crown domain take part in stabilizing the AP dimeric structure [4, 5]. Hoylaerts et al. [14] investigated whether the monomers in a given PLAP or GCAP dimer are subject to cooperativity during catalysis following an allosteric model or act via a half-of-sites model, in which at any time only a single monomer is operative. The authors used wt, single and double mutant PLAP homodimers and heterodimers for the analysis and found that mammalian APs are non-cooperative allosteric enzymes, but the stability and catalytic properties of each monomer are controlled by the conformation of the second AP subunit. The 3D structure of PLAP determined by Le Du et al. [4] contributed the visualization of the residues postulated to be involved in conferring the allosteric character to PLAP. The allosteric behavior is probably further favored by the quality of the dimer interface, by the long N-terminal α-helix from one monomer that embraces the other subunit, and by the protrusion of Tyr367 from one monomer into the active site of the other.

Recently, Llinas et al. [18] identified a novel, non-catalytic peripheral site on the surface of PLAP. This newly identified peripheral site is 28 Å from the active site but only 13 Å from the calcium binding site. The residues that constitute this site are located on two α-helices, 250–257 and 287–297. The loop between Ser257 and Ser287 contains the three residues that coordinate the Ca2+ ion, namely Phe269, Glu270, and Asp285 located only two residues from Ser287. Arg250 is located two residues away from Trp248 that interacts with the Ca2+ through a water molecule. Therefore, the large loop, comprising residues 250–297, that belongs to the peripheral domain of PLAP includes both the M4 site, and the peripheral binding site. The location of the Ca2+ ion in this loop suggests that the function of this novel M4 site could be related to the conformational stabilization of the two α-helices that form the peripheral site.

Finally, while ECAP is located in the periplasmic space of the bacterium, mammalian APs are ectoenzymes bound to the plasma membrane via a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor [19]. The GPI-glycan moiety, with general structure Protein-(ethanolamine-PO4-6Manα1-2Manα1-6Manα1-4 GlcN1-6myo-inositol-1-P-lipid, is added post-translationally to the nascent PLAP peptide chain in a transamidation reaction that involves the removal of a stretch of 29 hydrophobic amino acids from the COOH-terminus and the concomitant transfer of the preassembled GPI anchor to the new carboxyterminal amino acid, Asp484 in PLAP [20]. To-date, all mammalian APs are thought to be anchored to the plasma membrane with each monomer carrying one unit of the GPI anchor.

Substrate specificities

Mammalian APs have broad substrate specificity and are able to hydrolyze or transphosphorylate a wide variety of phosphated compounds in vitro. However only a select few of those compounds have to-date been confirmed to serve as natural substrates for some of the AP isozymes. It has been proposed that the role of TNAP in the bone matrix is to generate the Pi needed for hydroxyapatite crystallization [1, 21, 22]. However, TNAP has also been hypothesized to hydrolyze the mineralization inhibitor PPi to facilitate mineral precipitation and growth [1, 2325]. In fact, an inbornerror-of metabolism affecting the function of TNAP, hypophosphatasia, leads to severe rickets and osteomalacia [26]. Recent studies have provided compelling proof that a major function of TNAP in bone tissue consists in hydrolyzing PPi to maintain a proper concentration of this mineralization inhibitor to ensure normal bone mineralization. The nucleosidetriphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase activity of NPP1 and the transmembrane PPi-channeling protein ANK are responsible for supplying the larger amount of PPi to the extracellular spaces. Since mice deficient in TNAP (Akp2−/− mice) display high extracellular PPi levels, which lead to osteomalacia, Millán and colleagues [27, 28] tested the hypothesis that affecting the function of either NPP1 or ANK would have beneficial consequences on hypophosphatasia by reducing the amounts of extracellular PPi in the Akp2−/− mice and conversely that affecting the function of TNAP should also ameliorate the soft tissue ossification in the Enpp1−/− and ank/ank mutant animals. Indeed, experiments to rescue these abnormalities by combining two mutations, i.e., [Akp2−/−; Enpp1−/−] and [Akp2−/−; ank/ank] revealed that both double mutants led to improvement of hypophosphatasia as well as of the ossification of the vertebral apophyses confirming a major role of TNAP in regulating extracellular PPi levels [27, 28].

Pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP) has also been shown to be a physiological substrate for the TNAP present in leukocytes [29, 30]. TNAP isolated from human SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells hydrolyses phosphoethanolamine and PLP at physiologic pH [31]. Abnormalities in PLP metabolism also explain the epileptic seizures experienced by some patients with hypophosphatasia [26, 32]. Other described substrates include monofluorophosphate that can also be hydrolyzed by TNAP [33]. Human AP isozymes are able to hydrolyze phosphatidates with various fatty acyl chains (egg phosphatidate and dioleoyl, distearoyl, dipalmitoyl, dimyristoyl and dilauroyl phosphatidates). PLAP and IAP were capable of hydrolyzing all the phosphatidates examined with maximal activity in the presence of 10 g/l sodium deoxycholate and dilauroyl phosphatidate being the best substrate. The phosphatidate hydrolytic activity of PLAP was two-three times higher than that of the IAP enzyme, while TNAP did not hydrolyze phosphatidates with long fatty acyl chains (C16–18) even in the presence of sodium deoxycholate [34]. Inorganic polyphosphates (polyP), being energy-rich linear polymers of orthophosphate residues known from bacteria and yeast, also exist in higher eukaryotes. Calf IAP is able to cleave polyP molecules up to a chain length of about 800, acting as an exopolyphosphatase progressively degrading polyP. The pH optimum is in the alkaline range. TNAP was not able to hydrolyze polyP under the conditions tested while PLAP and ECAP displayed polyP-degrading activity [35].

APs appear also to be involved in the metabolism of nucleotides. Say et al. [36] reported that purified osseous plate TNAP displayed broad substrate specificity and was able to hydrolyze ATP, ADP, AMP, PPi, glucose-1-phosphate, glucose-6-phosphate, fructose-6-phosphate, β-glycerophosphate, bis-(p-nitrophenyl)-phosphate in addition to pNPP. However, ATP, bis-(p-nitrophenyl)-phosphate and PPi were among the less hydrolyzed substrates assayed. Nevertheless, TNAP appears to be able to hydrolyze ATP both at pH 7.5 and pH 9.4 [37]. However, Pizauro et al. [38] concluded that the membrane-specific ATPase activity present in osseous plate membranes and TNAP are different proteins. Several reports have indicated that TNAP is involved in AMP hydrolysis [39, 40]. Extracellular adenine nucleotides induce cAMP elevation through local adenosine production at the membrane surface and subsequent activation of adenosine A (2A) receptors in NG108-15 neuronal cells. NG108-15 cells hydrolyzed AMP to adenosine and this activity was suppressed at pH 6.5, but markedly increased at pH 8.5. The AMP hydrolysis was also blocked by levamisole, an uncompetitive inhibitor of TNAP [12], and the cells expressed TNAP mRNA. These results indicated that AMP phosphohydrolase activity in NG108-15 cells is due to TNAP, and suggest that this enzyme plays an essential role for the P1 antagonist-sensitive ATP-induced cAMP accumulation in NG108-15 cells [39]. Similarly, Picher et al. [40] found that two ectonucleotidases mediated the conversion of AMP to adenosine on the mucosal surface of human airway epithelia, i.e., ecto 5′-nucleotidase (CD73) and TNAP. While both mucosal and serosal epithelial surfaces displayed ecto 5′-nucleotidase activity,TNAP activity was restricted to the mucosal surface. These experiments support a major role for extracellular nucleotide catalysis and for the involvement of TNAP in the regulation of adenosine concentrations on airway surfaces.

Other catalytic properties of APs are also worth mentioning. AP isolated from the mouse intestine is able to catalyze the synthesis of PPi from Pi during hydrolysis of glucose 6-phosphate, ATP, ADP, PPi or pNPP [41]. While the rate of PPi synthesis is 1,000-fold lower than the rate of substrate hydrolysis, PPi synthesis increased by the addition of Mg2+ and also by decreasing the pH from 8.5 to 6.0. The data indicated that at the catalytic site of APs the energies of hydrolysis of the phosphoserine residue and of PPi are different from those measured in aqueous solutions. In another study, calf IAP was found to be able to effectively transphosphorylate thiamin to thiamin monophosphate using β-glycerophosphate or creatine phosphate as phosphate donors at pH 8.5. TMP production in the brush border membrane however was very small and corresponded to 0.001–0.01% of the total Pi simultaneously released by hydrolytic activity [42].

Rezende et al. [43] reported phosphodiesterase activity as a novel property of osseous plate TNAP. Bis-(p-nitrophenyl)-phosphate was hydrolyzed at both pH 7.5 and 9.4 with an apparent dissociation constant of 1.9 and 3.9 mM, respectively. The hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl-5′-thymidinephosphate followed hyberbolic kinetics with a K0.5 of 500 µM. The hydrolysis of cAMP by the enzyme followed more complex kinetics, showing site-site interactions (h = 1.7) and K0.5 = 300 µM for high-affinity sites. ATP and cAMP were competitive inhibitors of bis-(p-nitrophenyl)-phosphatase activity of the enzyme and Ki values (25 and 0.6 mM for cAMP and ATP, respectively) very close to those of the K0.5 (22 and 0.7 mM for cAMP and ATP, respectively), determined by direct assay, indicated that a single catalytic site was responsible for the hydrolysis of both substrates. The alkaline apparent pH optima, the requirement for bivalent metal ions and the inhibition by methylxanthines, amrinone and amiloride demonstrated that rat osseous plate TNAP was a type I phosphodiesterase [43]. More recently, Zhang et al. [44] suggested that TNAP, together with NPP1, could contribute to the pool of extracellular PPi via its phosphodiesterase activity. So, it is possible that TNAP both degrades and produces PPi but the relative significance for skeletal mineralization of this hypothetical dual role still remains to be clarified. Various in vitro studies have also led to the suggestion that APs may function as a plasma membrane phosphoprotein phosphatase. Sarrouilhe et al. [45] used purified rat liver plasma membranes to study endogenous phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events and detected an 18-kDa phosphoprotein as a potential substrate for TNAP. Fedde et al. [46], however, compared the phosphorylation of plasma membrane proteins from control fibroblasts to those from profoundly TNAP-deficient fibroblasts of hypophosphatasia patients. They found no consistent different among all identifiable plasma membrane phosphoproteins in the control and hypophosphatasia samples and concluded that TNAP does not modulate the phosphorylation of plasma membrane proteins. Scheibe et al. [47] also showed that a 98-kDa membrane protein, autophosphorylated via its endogenous ectokinase activity, was dephosphorylated by TNAP in both murine P19 teratocarcinoma and HL-60 human myelopblastic leukemic cells. So, a putative role for APs as phosphoprotein phosphatases remains an open question at this point in time.

APs as members of a superfamily of enzymes

Of interest is the fact that APs appear to have structural similarity to a large number of other enzymes. Cofactorindependent phosphoglycerate mutase (iPGM) (EC 5.4.2.1) has been previously identified as a member of the AP superfamily of enzymes, based on the conservation of the predicted metal-binding residues [48]. Iterative homology searches resulted in the identification of similarly conserved regions in phosphopentomutases (EC 5.4.2.7), APs (EC 3.1.3.1) and in several previously uncharacterized proteins. All the amino acid residues that interact with Zn1 (Asp327, His331, and His412) and Zn2 (Asp51, Asp369, and His370) in ECAP [3] (Figure 2) are absolutely conserved in phosphocarbohydrate-binding proteins of the AP superfamily [48]. On the other hand, the ligands to the Mg site of ECAP are much less conserved, since an E322N substitution is found in phosphopentomutases and iPGMs, while Asp153 and Thr155 do not seem to be conserved at all. The strong conservation of the metal-binding residues in both phosphopentomutase and iPGM indicates that both these enzymes are metal dependent. Structural alignment of iPGM with ECAP and cerebroside sulfatase confirmed that all these enzymes have a common core structure and revealed similarly located conserved Ser (in iPGM, ECAP and mammalian APs) or Cys (in sulfatases) residues in their active sites. In ECAP and mammalian APs, this Ser residue is phosphorylated during catalysis, whereas in sulfatases the active site Cys residue is modified to formylglycine and sulfatated. Similarly located Thr residue forms a phosphoenzyme intermediate in phosphodiesterase/nucleotide pyrophosphatase-1 (NPP1). In fact, APs are known to have phosphotransferase and also phosphodiesterase [43] activities, while iPGM and NPP1 can also function as phosphatases [49, 50]. Using structure-based sequence alignment, Galperin and Jedrezjas [51] identified homologous Ser, Thr, or Cys residues in other enzymes of the AP superfamily, such as phosphopentomutase, phosphoglycerol transferase, phosphonoacetate hydrolase, and GPI-anchoring enzymes (GPI-phosphoethanolamine transferases). Thus, this AP superfamily includes enzymes with substantially different activities (isomerases, hydrolases, and a putative lyase), which, however, all act on similar phosphocarbohydrate (or sulfocarbohydrate) substrates.

While these bioinformatics studies were done using the ECAP structure as paradigm, the same structural similarity is bound to exist with the mammalian APs since as discussed the active site of mammalian APs is well-conserved with that of ECAP. The authors predict that the catalytic cycles of all the members of this superfamily involve phosphorylation, or sulfatation, or phosphonation of these conserved Ser/Thr/Cys residues. This would imply that all enzymes of the AP superfamily would have the same reaction scheme (Scheme 1) where phosphate (sulphate or phosphonate) acceptor can be either water (r2 = H, in phosphatases, sulfatases, phosphonate hydrolases) or a second substrate (in phosphoglycerol and phosphoethanolamine transferases) or just a different hydroxyl group of the same original substrate r1 (in iPGM and phosphopentomutase).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11302-005-5435-6/MediaObjects/11302_2005_Article_5435_Fig4.jpg

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by grants DE12889 and AR47908 from the National Institutes of Health, USA.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006