Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making?
- Lea-Rachel D. KosnikAffiliated withDepartment of Economics, University of Missouri—St Louis Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Confirmatory bias, defined as the tendency to misinterpret new pieces of evidence as confirming previously held hypotheses, can lead to implacable, even incorrect decision making. It is one of the biases, along with anchoring, framing, and other judgment heuristic errors, that may lead to non-optimal behavior. This paper tests for the existence of confirmatory bias behavior in a uniquely economic setting (tax policy) and in a context relatively lacking in ambiguity. It also tests whether the confirmatory bias phenomenon can be prevalent enough to affect aggregate outcomes, a characteristic important in economic models in particular. The results indicate not only that confirmatory bias exists, but that the confirmatory bias effect may be stronger for evidence relating to losses than for comparable evidence relating to gains.
KeywordsConfirmatory bias Rationality Judgment Heuristics Tax policy
- Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making?
Mind & Society
Volume 7, Issue 2 , pp 193-214
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Confirmatory bias
- Tax policy
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Economics, University of Missouri—St Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St Louis, MO, 63121, USA