Original Article

Mind & Society

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 215-226

First online:

Taboo or tragic: effect of tradeoff type on moral choice, conflict, and confidence

  • David R. MandelAffiliated withDefence Research and Development Canada Email author 
  • , Oshin VartanianAffiliated withDefence Research and Development Canada

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

Historically, cognitivists considered moral choices to be determined by analytic processes. Recent theories, however, have emphasized the role of intuitive processes in determining moral choices. We propose that the engagement of analytic and intuitive processes is contingent on the type of tradeoff being considered. Specifically, when a tradeoff necessarily violates a moral principle no matter what choice is made, as in tragic tradeoffs, its resolution should result in greater moral conflict and less confidence in choice than when the tradeoff offers a moral escape route, as in taboo tradeoffs. We manipulated tradeoff type in between subjects design and confirmed the prediction that tragic tradeoffs prompt more conflict and less confidence than taboo tradeoffs. The findings further revealed that moral conflict mediated the effect of tradeoff type on confidence. The study sheds light on the manner in which human minds resolve moral problems involving social agents.

Keywords

Analytic and intuitive processes Subjective mental effort Problem difficulty Moral choice Confidence Moral conflict Omission bias Trolley problem