Abstract
The Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF) lent $2.3 trillion worth of general collateral to 18 investment houses in exchange for riskier securities. Treasury collateral was in high demand in 2008 and 2009 as repo markets shunned lower quality collateral. This paper finds a negative and significant relationship between participating in the TSLF and having funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and other Federal Reserve lending programs. Thus, it appears that the TSLF was a substitute for other bailouts. In addition, dealers with higher paid CEOs were more likely to borrow in the next TSLF auction cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because no dollars changed hands in the TSLF program, it had no effect on the money supply and was unrelated to open market operations, which involve the buying and selling of Treasuries with currency. The TSLF program only exchanged securities, and thus, it did not impact bank reserves as Flemming et al. (2009) explain.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, March 11, 2009, “Press Release, Federal Reserve Announces Expansion of Its Securities Lending Program,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080311a.htm.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, June 25, 2009, “Press Release, Federal Reserve Announces Extensions of and Modifications to A Number of Its Liquidity Programs,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20090625a.htm.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, January 27, 2010, “Press Release, January 26–27 Federal Open Market Committee meeting statement,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100127a.htm.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, March 20, 2008, “Press Release, New York Fed Announces Modifications to Terms and Conditions of Term Securities Lending Facility,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/news/markets/2008/rp080320.html.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, June 25, 2009, “Term Securities Lending Facility: Program Terms and Conditions,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/tslf_terms.html.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, March 20, 2008, “Press Release, New York Fed Announces Modifications to Terms and Conditions of Term Securities Lending Facility,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/news/markets/2008/rp080320.html.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, September 14, 2008, “Press Release: Board Announces Several Initiatives to Provide Additional Support to Financial Markets,” accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080914a.htm.
This was prior to the passage of Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) in July 2008. This act gave the U.S. Treasury secretary authority to inject funds into the government sponsored agencies (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, signalling explicit federal support for their debt. Paulson (2010, pp. 155, 169–170) writes that he got to use the “bazooka” in the HERA legislation on the Sunday of Labor Day weekend, September 8, 2008, when the government began funding the restructured agencies with taxpayer dollars. At this point, schedule 1 collateral, agency debt, became much safer.
Jeannine Aversa, December 1, 2010, “Fed Names Recipients Of Aid — Startling Report Documents Trillions Of Dollars Used To Prop Up Global Financial System,” Associated Press.
See Bob Ivry, Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz, Nov 27, 2011, “Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks $13 Billion Undisclosed to Congress,” Bloomberg Markets Magazine, accessed online on March 19, 2012, at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html.
Wilson and Wu (2012) also found that the predictive power of total assets went away when controlling for CEO pay. That study also found that CEO pay was significant when total assets were not.
References
Bayazitova, D., & Shivdasani, A. (2012). Assessing TARP. Review of Financial Studies, 25(2), 377–407.
Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. (2005). Pay without performance: overview of the issues. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 8–22.
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654.
Cadman, B. D., Carter, M. E., & Lynch, L. J. (2012). Executive pay restrictions: do they restrict firms’ willingness to participate in TARP? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 39(7), 997–1027.
Copeland, A.M., Martin, A., & Walker, M. (2011). Repo runs: evidence from the tri-party repo market. FRB of New York Staff Report No. 506. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906766. Accessed 19 March 2012.
Cornett, M. M., Li, L., & Tehranian, H. (2013). The performance of banks around the receipt and repayment of TARP funds: over-achievers versus under-achievers. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(3), 730–746.
Duchin, R., & Sosyura, D. (2012). The politics of government investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), 24–48.
Duygan-Bump, B., Parkinson, P. M., Rosengren, E. S., Suarez, G. A., & Willen, P. S. (2013). How effective were the Federal Reserve emergency liquidity facilities? Evidence from the asset-backed commercial paper money market mutual fund liquidity facility. Journal of Finance, 68(2), 715–737.
Fleming, M. J., Hrung, W. B., & Keane, F. M. (2009). The term securities lending facility: origin, design, and effects. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 15(2), 1–10.
Gorton, G.B. (2010). Questions and answers about the financial crisis - Prepared for the U.S. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Social Science Research Network Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1557279. Accessed 15 April 2013.
Gorton, G., & Metrick, A. (2012). Securitized banking and the run on repo. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2), 425–451.
Hördahl, P., & King, M.R., (2008, December). Developments in repo markets during the financial turmoil. BIS Quarterly Review, 37–53.
Hrung, W.B., & Seligman, J.S. (2011). Responses to the financial crisis, treasury debt, and the impact on short-term money markets. FRB of New York Staff Report No. 481.
Li, L. (2011). TARP funds distribution and bank loan supply. Working paper, Boston College.
Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470.
Ng, J., Vasvari, F.P., & Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2010). Were healthy banks chosen in the TARP Capital Purchase Program? Social Science Network, Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1566284. Accessed 8 December 2011.
Paulson, H. M. (2010). On the Brink: Inside the race to stop the collapse of the global financial system. New York: Business Plus (pp. 155, 169–170).
Sorkin, A. R. (2009). Too big to fail: The inside story of how Wall Street and Washington fought to save the financial system–and themselves (p. 281). New York: Viking.
Taliaferro, R. (2009). How do banks use bailout money? Optimal capital structure, new equity, and the TARP. Social Science Network, Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1481256. Accessed 8 December 2011.
Pana, E., & Wilson, L. (2012). Political influence and TARP investments in credit unions. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 2(4), doi:10.1142/S2010139212500176.
Wilson, L., & Wu, W.Y. (2011a). Does receiving tarp funds make it easier to roll your commercial paper onto the Fed? Social Science Network, Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911454. Accessed 8 December 2011.
Wilson, L., & Wu, W.Y. (2011b). Overpaid CEOs got FDIC debt guarantees. Social Science Network Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1977345. Accessed 9 March 2011.
Wilson, L., & Wu, W. Y. (2012). Escaping TARP. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(1), 32–42.
Wu, T. (2008). On the effectiveness of the Federal Reserve’s new liquidity facilities. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper No. 2008-08. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1136942. Accessed 12 March 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendixes
Appendixes
Appendix A: List of Primary Dealers Eligible for the TSLF
Appendix B: Marginal Effects of the Logistic Regressions
The logistic model generates probabilities that an investment bank participates in the TSLF. Let x be a column vector of independent variables X 1,…,X N , where N is an integer greater than 1, and b is a row vector of coefficients b 1 ,…,b N for the independent variables. Let us assume that the estimated intercept coefficient is α. If the independent variable is denoted by the variable Y, then the probability of receiving TARP funds is p(Y = 1|x) below:
To find the marginal effects of a change in the independent variable Xj, where N ≥ j ≥ 1 we need to differentiate Eq. (1) with respect to Xj. That simplifies to the following expression:
In Tables 6 and 7, we have reported the marginal effects for Tables 3 and 4. Since the marginal effects in the logistic model are dependent on the values of all the independent variables, we have chosen the mean values of the independent variables from the summary statistics in Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, L., Wu, Y.W. & Prejean, S. Are the Bailouts of Wall Street Complements or Substitutes?. Atl Econ J 42, 21–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-013-9395-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-013-9395-x
Keywords
- Bailout
- Banks
- Capital Purchase Program (CPP)
- CEO pay
- Discount window
- Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010
- Emergency lending