Skip to main content
Log in

Shift between carnivory and omnivory in stream stonefly predators

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Omnivory can have profound effects on the trophic dynamics of communities and ecosystems, as they may interact with multiple trophic levels simultaneously. Some species of large-bodied stoneflies may be viewed as omnivores rather than true carnivores even at later nymphal stages. We evaluated the seasonal change in the diet of stonefly predators by analyzing their stable isotope ratio, gut contents, physiological activity, and food availability. A two-source-based mixing model based on stable isotope analysis revealed that stoneflies shifted their diet between carnivory in summer and omnivory in winter—despite the higher availability of animal prey in winter. The gut content analysis showed that swift prey (mayflies) were consumed in the summer, whereas sluggish prey (Chironomidae) were consumed in the winter. The physiological activity of stoneflies also declined markedly in winter. These results suggest that, in winter, stoneflies foraged on a mixture of Chironomidae and algae. It appears that omnivory in some stream consumers is related to the seasonal change in temperature-dependent physiological activity, rather than prey availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1982) Feeding habits and prey consumption of three setipalpian stoneflies (Plecoptera) in a mountain stream. Ecology 63:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz F, Saborowski R (2000) Metabolic and enzymatic adaptations in northern krill, Meganyctiphanes norvegica, and Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:115–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feminella JW, Stewart KW (1986) Diet and predation by three leaf-associated stoneflies (Plecoptera) in an Arkansas mountain stream. Freshw Biol 16:521–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Miyasaka H (2007) Length–weight relationships of four predatory species in Japan. Limnology 8:171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Nozaki K, Mitsuhashi H, Kohmatsu Y, Miyasaka H, Nakanishi M (2000) Push-up response of stonefly larvae in low-oxygen conditions. Ecol Res 15:175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Mitsuhashi H, Kohmatsu Y, Miyasaka H, Nozaki K, Nakanishi M (2005) A seasonal change in the distribution of a stream-dwelling stonefly nymphs reflects oxygen supply and water flow. Ecol Res 20:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrel A, Vanhooydonck B, Van Damme R (2004) Omnivory in lacertid lizards: adaptive evolution or constraint? J Evol Biol 17:974–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN (1970) The ecology of running waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishi D, Murakami M, Nakano S, Maekawa K (2005) Water temperature determines strength of top-down control in a stream food web. Freshw Biol 50:1315–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Bradley DC, Hogan A, Waldron S (2005) Intraguild omnivory in predatory stream insects. J Anim Ecol 74:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama A, Yamada Y, Rusuwa B, Yuma M (2001) Change in stable nitrogen isotope ratio in the muscle tissue of a migratory goby, Rhinogobius sp., in a natural setting. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2125–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaka H, Genkai-Kato M (2007) Accuracy assessment for chlorophyll a measurements in the gut of stream stonefly nymphs. In: Tanabe S, Takeoka H, Isobe T, Nishibe Y (eds) Chemical pollution and environmental changes. Universal Academy Press, Tokyo, pp 335–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Lawton JH (1978) On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275:542–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi Y, Nakano S (2000) Condition-specific competition: implications for the altitudinal distribution of stream fishes. Ecology 81:2027–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unesco (1966) Determination of photosynthetic pigments in sea-water. In: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ed) Monographs on oceanographic methodology. Unesco Press, Paris

  • Vadeboncoeur Y, McCann KS, Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (2005) Effects of multi-chain omnivory on the strength of trophic control in lakes. Ecosystems 8:682–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ15N and δ13C and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (2001) Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2061–2066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interaction in size-structured populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng N, Neelin JD, Lau KM, Tucker CJ (1999) Enhancement of interdecadal climate variability in the Sahel by vegetation interaction. Science 286:1537–1540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to A.R. McIntosh, J. Urabe, M.J. Vander Zanden and T.W. Miller for their comments on the manuscript. We thank K. Nozaki for identifying algal species. H. Mitsuhashi and Y. Kohmatsu helped with the field survey. This research was partly supported by the 21st COE Program at Ehime University, the Foundation of River and Watershed Environmental Management of Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitoshi Miyasaka.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 2 Sample numbers of three stonefly species for individual dry weight, stable isotope, diet, and physiological activity analyses

Appendix 2

Table 3 Mean individual dry weight (mg) of 20 animal prey taxa in summer and winter

About this article

Cite this article

Miyasaka, H., Genkai-Kato, M. Shift between carnivory and omnivory in stream stonefly predators. Ecol Res 24, 11–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0475-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0475-3

Keywords

Navigation