Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The frequency of distomolar teeth in a population of urban Turkish adults: a retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the frequency, location, and shape of distomolar teeth in a population of urban Turkish adults.

Methods

A total of 4,023 patients (1,586 males, 2,437 females) with a mean age of 32.85 ± 10.82 years (males 33.01 ± 11.39, females 32.76 ± 10.62) were studied. Patients younger than 18 years of age were excluded. Panoramic radiographs of the patients were examined to diagnose the presence of distomolar teeth. In the diagnosis, care was taken to include only those patients who had not undergone any extractions in the third molar regions. Data were analyzed by the chi-squared test (P < 0.05).

Results

The presence of distomolars was observed in 0.57% of this population. In total, 29 distomolar teeth were observed in 23 patients. Distomolars were found primarily in the maxillary left (n = 8, 27.5% of the distomolars) and right quadrants (n = 6, 20.6% of the distomolars). In one patient, they were observed in all four quadrants. Distomolars occured more frequently in the maxilla (n = 20, 68.9% of the distomolars), were often impacted (n = 20, 68.9% of the distomolars), and were found bilaterally in three cases (0.07%).

Conclusion

In cases of infection and pain in the molar area, dental practioners may be suspicious of the presence of fourth molars in fully erupted dentition and should make a detailed and careful investigation of panoramic radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kokten G, Balcioglu H, Buyukertan M. Supernumerary fourth and fifth molars: a report of two cases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4:67–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nevilla BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouyuot JE. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghom AG. Textbook of oral medicine. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grimanis GA, Kyriakides AT, Spyropoulos ND. A survey on supernumerary molars. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:989–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menardia-Pejuan V, Berini-Aytes L. Supernumerary molars. A review of 53 cases. Int Res Sci Stomatol. 2000;402:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yusuf WZ. Non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth. Literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990;56:147–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sapp JP, Eversole LR, Wysocki GP. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:621–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Regezi JA, Sciubb JJ. Oral pathology clinical pathologic correlations. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohman A, Kivijärvi K, Blombäck U, Flygare L. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(1):30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maverna R, Gracco A. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: clinical considerations. Prog Orthod. 2007;8(1):28–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubuk AN, Selvig KA, Tellefsen G, Wikejho UM. Atypically located paramolar. Report of a rare case. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:138–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anemone R, Robert L, Elizabeth S. Dental development in apes and humans. J Hum Evol. 1992;22:149–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordendram A. Fourth and fifth molars in ramus mandibula: case report. Odontol Tidskr. 1968;76:23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sugimura M, Tsuji Y, Yamaguchi K, Yoshida Y, Tanioka H. Mandibular distomolars. A review of the Japanese literature and a report of three additional cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975;40:341–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Timocin N, Yalcin S, Ozgen M, Tanyeri H. Supernumerary molars and paramolars. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1994;36:145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu JF. Characteristics of premaxillary supernumerary teeth: a survey of 112 cases. ASDC J Dent Child. 1995;62:262–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sedano HO, Ocampo-Acosta F, Naranjo Corona RI, Torres-Arellano ME. Multiple dens invaginatus, mulberry molar, and conical teeth. Case report and genetic considerations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E69–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007;24:140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Orhan AI, Ozer L, Orhan K. Familial occurrence of nonsyndromal multiple supernumerary teeth. A rare condition. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:891–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Ozel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, A., Altundal, H. & Ozel, E. The frequency of distomolar teeth in a population of urban Turkish adults: a retrospective study. Oral Radiol 25, 118–122 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0020-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0020-2

Keywords

Navigation