Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of VANET Routing Protocols: On Road Side Unit Placement Strategies

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is a communication paradigm where vehicles can communicate directly with other vehicles or via intermediate fixed architectures called as road side units (RSU). Generally, the density of vehicles vary from very dense to shallow depending on various factors and different scenarios of the roads. In cities the number of cars is high and on highways and specifically in rural areas the density of vehicles varies. Therefore, direct vehicle to vehicle communication faces many problems in communication due to outages. In such scenarios the intermediate infrastructure needs to play an important role. Various routing protocols are implemented for VANETs with variety of design goals. In this paper we investigate the performance of proactive and reactive routing protocols, namely destination sequence distance vector (DSDV) and ad-hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol, for various placement strategies of RSU based relays and in city scenario. The simulations were carried on NS2 which suggest that in various settings AODV perform better than DSDV routing protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagaraj, U., Kharat, M., & Dhamal, P. (2011). Study of various routing protocols in vanet. In IJCIST volume 2, issue 4, Oct–Dec 2011, pp. 45–52. IJCIST

  2. Dar, K., Bakhouya, M., Gaber, J., & Wack, M. (2010). Evaluating information dissemination approaches in vanets. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on pervasive services (ICPS 2010) July, 2010

  3. Cheng, H. T., Shan, H., & Zhuang, W. (2011). Infotainment and road safety service support in vehicular networking: From a communication perspective. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(6), 2020–2038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amadeo, M., Campolo, C., & Molinaro, A. (2012). Enhancing IEEE 802.11 p/WAVE to provide infotainment applications in VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(2), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomar, P., Chaurasia, B. K., & Tomar, G. S. (2010). State of the art of data dissemination in vanets. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 2(6), 957–962.

  6. Hartenstein, H., & Laberteaux, K. P. (2008). A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 46(6), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rawashdeh, Z. Y., & Mahmud, S. M. (2008). Intersection collision avoidance system architecture. In Consumer communications and networking conference, 2008. CCNC 2008. 5th IEEE, pp. 493–494. IEEE, 2008

  8. Shaikh, F. K., Shah, M., Shaikh, B., & Shaikh, R. (2013). Implementation and evaluation of vehicle-to-vehicle traffic congestion detection. In 3rd International multi-topic conference (accepted to appear). Berlin: Springer.

  9. Zhang, M., & Wolff, R. (2008). Routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks in rural areas. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 46(11), 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoso, G. Z., & Kang, M. (2012). Performance analysis of AODV, DSDV and OLSR in a VANETs safety application scenario. In Advanced communication technology (ICACT), 2012 14th international conference on, pp. 57–60. IEEE, 2012.

  11. Haerri, J., Filali, F., & Bonnet, C. (2006). Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns. In Proceedings of 5th IFIP mediterranean ad-hoc networking workshop (Med-Hoc-Net-2006), Lipari, Italy, 2006.

  12. Rani, P., Sharma, N., & Singh, P. K. (2011). Performance comparison of vanet routing protocols. In Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (WiCOM), 2011 7th international conference on, pp. 1–4. IEEE, 2011.

  13. McCanne, S., & Floyd, S. (2014). NS: Network simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. Last accessed: Oct., 2014.

  14. Palma, V., & Vegni, A. M. (2013). On the optimal design of a broadcast data dissemination system over VANET providing V2V and V2I communications “the vision of rome as a smart city”. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2013(1), 41–48.

  15. Paul, B., Ibrahim, M., Bikas, M., & Naser, A. (2012). Vanet routing protocols: Pros and cons. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.1201, 2012.

  16. Altayeb, M., & Mahgoub, I. (2013). A survey of vehicular ad hoc networks routing protocols. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(3), 829–846.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, K. C., Lee, U., & Gerla, M. (2010). Survey of routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks. In M. Watfa (Ed.), Advances in vehicular ad-hoc networks: Developments and challenges (pp. 149–170). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-913-2.ch008.

  18. Kaur, T., & Verma, A. K. (2012). Simulation and analysis of AODV routing protocol in vanets. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN: 2231,2(3), 293–301.

  19. Chowdhury, S. I., Lee, W.-I., Choi, Y.-S., Kee, G.-Y., & Pyun, J.-Y. (2011). Performance evaluation of reactive routing protocols in vanet. In Communications (APCC), 2011 17th Asia-Pacific conference on, pp. 559–564. IEEE, 2011.

  20. Wu, P. J. (2014). NSG tool. https://sites.google.com/site/pengjungwu/nsg. Last accessed: Sep., 2014.

  21. Malek, J. (2014). Trace graph,http://www.nsnam.com/2012/09/tracegraph-graphing-software-to-plot.html. Last accessed: Aug., 2014.

  22. Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., & Morris, R. (2005). Srcrr: A high throughput routing protocol for 802.11 mesh networks (draft).

  23. ELshaikh, M., Kamel, N., & Awang, A. (2009). High throughput routing algorithm metric for OLSR routing protocol in wireless mesh networks. In Signal processing & its applications, 2009. CSPA 2009. 5th international colloquium on, pp. 445–448. IEEE, 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan and the Transportation and Crowd Management Center of Research Excellence (TCMCORE) at Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We also thank the Science and Technology Unit at Umm Al-Qura University for their continued logistic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal Karim Shaikh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, F., Shaikh, F.K., Ansari, A.Q. et al. Comparative Analysis of VANET Routing Protocols: On Road Side Unit Placement Strategies. Wireless Pers Commun 85, 393–406 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2745-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2745-z

Keywords

Navigation