Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density in the Italian Water Sector: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public utilities could improve their efficiency by pursuing specific strategies, such as growth, diversification of investments, or serving mainly high densely areas. For example, in the water sector, economies of scope and scale both appear possible, but extant literature does not offer clear or consensual findings. To address this lack of clarity, this article investigates the potential for efficiency improvement in the diverse Italian water sector, which comprises utilities of various sizes, operating in areas with various population densities and organized as mono- or multi-utilities. Technical and financial data from 64 different utilities were collected and then analyzed with a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach to reveal the impacts of different operational and exogenous variables on efficiency, including firm size, the degree of investment diversification, and customer density. The results obtained confirm the existence of all three types of economies (scale, scope and density), albeit with different impacts for each DEA score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott M, Cohen B (2009) Productivity and efficiency in the water industry. Util Policy 17:233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Aida K, Cooper WW, Pastor JT, Sueyoshi T (1998) Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: a range-adjusted measure of inefficiency. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 26(2):207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsharif K, Feroz EH, Klemer A, Raab R (2008) Governance of water supply systems in the Palestinian territories: a data envelopment analysis approach to the management of water resources. J Environ Manage 87:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aly HY, Grabowski R, Pasurka C, Rangan N (1990) Technical, scale and allocative efficiencies in US banking: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 72:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonioli B, Fillipini M (2001) The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Util Policy 10:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwandter L, Ozuna T (2002) Can public sector reform improve the efficiency of public water utilities? Environ Dev Econ 7:687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton J (1999) Economies of scale, economies of capital utilisation and capital utilisation in the English and Welsh water industry. Working Paper Series. Bournemouth University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton J (2003) Capital utilization and scale in the English and Welsh Water Industry. Serv Ind J 23(5):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Gifford JL (1988) A relative efficiency model for the evaluation of public health nurse productivity. Mellon University Mimeo, Carnegie

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Faust AK (2009) The cost structure of water utilities in Switzerland. Working Paper Cahier de recherche No HES-SO/HEG-GE/C--10/5/1--CH, Haute école de gestion de Genève CRAG, Switzerland

  • Berg SV, Marques RC (2011) Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a literature survey. Water Policy 13(5):591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya A, Harris T, Narayanan R, Raffiee K (1995) Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 25:759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett PL, Golany B (1996) Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 42(3):466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes P, Grosskopf S, Hayes K (1986) Efficiency and ownership: further evidence. Rev Econ Stat 668:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes J, Crase L, Dollery B, Villano R (2010) The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Resour Energy Econ 32(3):439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC (2011) The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. J Environ Manage 92:2698–2707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC, Berg S (2012) A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure. Util Policy 21:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves WC, Christensen LR, Swanson JA (1981) Productivity growth, scale economies, and capacity utilization in U.S. railroads, 1955–74. Am Econ Rev 71:994–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirkos TN, Sears AM (1994) Technical efficiency and the competitive behavior of hospitals. Socio Econ Plan Sci 28:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark D (2000) Public service reform: a comparative west European perspective. West Eur Polit 23(3):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Co.n.vi.r.i. (2009) Rapporto sullo stato dei servizi idrici. Commissione Nazionale di Vigilanza sulle Risorse Idriche, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ (1996) A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (Computer) Program. CEPA Working Paper 96/8, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia

  • Coelli T (1998) A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. Oper Res Lett 23(3–5):143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz NF, Marques RC (2011) Viability of municipal companies in the provision of urban infrastructure services. Local Gov Stud 37(1):93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz NF, Marques RC, Romano G, Guerrini A (2012) Measuring the efficiency of water utilities: a cross-national comparison between Portugal and Italy. Water Policy 14(5):841–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbin J, Tzanidakis G (1998) Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry. Util Policy 7:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2010) Designing performance incentives, an International benchmark study in the water sector. CEJOR 18:189–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2011) Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies. J Prod Anal 35:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietsch M, Weill L (1999) Les performances des banques de dépots francaises: une evaluation par la méthod DEA. In: Badillo PY, Paradi JC (eds) La méthod DEA. Hermes Science Publications, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Estache A, Kouassi E (2002) Sector organization, governance and the inefficiency of African water utilities. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2890. http://elibrary.worldbank.orgcontent/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-2890. Accessed 2 Jan 2013

  • Fabbri P, Fraquelli G (2000) Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empirica 27:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippini M, Hrovatin N, Zoric J (2008) Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. J Prod Anal 29:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford J, Warford J (1969) Cost functions for the water industry. J Ind Econ 18(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox W, Hofler R (1985) Using homothetic composed error frontiers to measure water utility efficiency. South Econ J 53(2):461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraquelli G, Giandrone R (2003) Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: implications of plant size, structure and scale economics. Water Resour Res 39(10):1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraquelli G, Moiso V (2005) Cost efficiency and economies of scale in the Italian water industry, SIEP. http://www-3.unipv.it/websiep/wp/420.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2013

  • Fraquelli G, Piacenza M, Vannoni D (2004) Scope and scale economies in multi- utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations. Appl Econ 36(18):2045–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia S, Thomas A (2001) The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. J Prod Anal 16:5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia S, Moreaux M, Reynaud A (2007) Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: an application to the water sector. Int J Ind Organ 25:791–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez I (2006) Efficiency measurement in Spanish local government: the case of municipal water services. Rev Policy Res 23(2):355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattoufi S, Oral M, Reisman A (2004) Data envelopment analysis literature: a bibliography update (1951–2001). Socio Econ Plan Sci 38:159–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Gómez F, García-Rubio MA (2008) Efficiency in the management of urban water services. What have we learned after four decades of research? Hacienda Pública Esp 185(2):39–67

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Gómez F, García–Rubio MA, Alcalá-Olid F, Ortega-Díaz MI (2013) Outsourcing and efficiency in the management of rural water service. Water Resour Manag 27(3):731–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2011) Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies. Int J Public Sect Manag 24(6):543–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes K (1987) Cost structure of the water industry. Appl Econ 19:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff A (2007) Second stage DEA: comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score. Eur J Oper Res 181:425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Adm 69(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtsma J (2003) Water supply in California: economies of scale, water charges, efficiency and privatization, ERSA Congress, August. http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/379.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2013

  • Hunt L, Lynk E (1995) Privatization and efficiency in the UK water industry: an empirical analysis. Oxf Rev Econ Stat 57(3):371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HY (1987) Economies of scale in multi-product firms: an empirical analysis. Economica 54:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Clark R (1988) Economies of scale and scope in water supply. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27(2):163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim E, Lee H (1998) Spatial integration of urban water services and economies of scale. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 10(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick C, Parker D, Zhang YF (2006) State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: an empirical analysis. World Bank Econ Rev 20(1):143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp M (1978) Economies of scale in sewerage purification and disposal. J Ind Econ 27(2):163–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynk E (1993) Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case. Fisc Stud 14:98–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques RC, De Witte K (2011) Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector. Econ Model 28(3):1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins R, Fortunato A, Coelho F (2006) Cost structure of the Portuguese water industry: a cubic cost function application, GEMF, 9. https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/11747/1/Cost%20Structure%20of%20the%20Portuguese%20Water%20Industry.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  • Massarutto A, Paccagnan V, Linares E (2008) Private management and public finance in the Italian water industry: a marriage of convenience? Water Resour Res 44:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Urakami T (2001) Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Pap Reg Sci 80(2):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauges C, Van den Berg C (2008) Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies. J Regul Econ 34(2):144–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne S (2006) The new public governance? Public Manag Rev 8(3):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzar JC, Willig RD (1981) Economies of scope. Am Econ Rev 71(2):268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Peda P, Grossi G, Liik M (2013) Do ownership and size affect the performance of water utilities? Evidence from Estonian municipalities. J Manag Governance 17(2):237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray SC (1991) Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Manag Sci 37:1620–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti S (1999) Municipal water supply and sewerage treatment: costs, prices and distortions. Can J Econ 32:689–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti S, Dupont D (2009) Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: the role of environmental factors. Land Econ 85(4):627–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Guerrini A (2011) Measuring and comparing the efficiency of water utility companies: a data envelopment analysis approach. Util Policy 19(3):202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Guerrini A, Vernizzi S (2013) Ownership, investment policies and funding choices of Italian water utilities: an empirical analysis. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3409–3419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal D, Parker D (2000) The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model. Manag Decis Econ 21(6):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal D, Parker D, Weyman-Jones T (2007) Determining the contribution of technical efficiency and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000. J Prod Anal 28:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer J (2005) Economies of scale and firm size optimum in rural water supply. Water Resour Res 41:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton TR, Sleeper S, Taggart RE Jr (1994) Improving pupil transportation in North Carolina. Interfaces 24:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih JS, Harrington W, Pizer WA, Gillingham K (2006) Economies of scale in community water systems. J Am Water Works Assoc 98(9):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1994) Politicians and firms. Q J Econ 109:995–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre J (1987) Economies and diseconomies of scale. In: The new Palgrave: A Dictionary of economics, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 80–84

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2004) Performance of the bootstrap for DEA estimators and iterating the principle. In: Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 265–298 (Chapter 10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-sage semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econom 136:31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton KR (2002) Trends in relationship lending and factors affecting relationship lending efficiency. J Bank Financ 26:127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolp C (1990) Strength and weaknesses of data envelopment analysis: an urban and regional perspective. Comput Environ Urban Syst 14:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone and Webster Consultants for OFWAT (2004) Investigation into evidence for economies of scale in the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: Final Report. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/pricereview/pr04/rpt_com_econofscale.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2013

  • Tania C, Marques R (2011) Performance of Portuguese water utilities: how do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency? Water Policy 13(3):343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasman ACIL (2007) Size and scope economies in water and wastewater services. Investigation Report. Economic Regulatory Authority, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres M, Morrison-Paul CJ (2006) Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. J Urban Econ 59:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tupper H, Resende M (2004) Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewerage sector: an empirical study. Util Policy 12:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynan N, Kingdom B (2005) Optimal size for utilities? Public policy for the private sector, Note number 283, World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWSS/Resources/optimalsize.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2013

  • Urakami T (2007) Economies of vertical integration in the Japanese water supply industry. Jahrb Reg 27(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zschille M, Walter M (2012) The performance of German water utilities: a (semi)-parametric analysis. Appl Econ 44(29):3749–3764

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Verona, Via dell’Artigliere 19, 37129, Verona, Italy

    Andrea Guerrini & Bettina Campedelli

  2. Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Via Ridolfi 10, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Giulia Romano

Authors
  1. Andrea Guerrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giulia Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bettina Campedelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Guerrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerrini, A., Romano, G. & Campedelli, B. Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density in the Italian Water Sector: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Water Resour Manage 27, 4559–4578 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0426-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0426-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation