Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial Optimization Models for Water Supply Allocation

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is likely to result in increased aridity, lower runoff, and declining water supplies for the cities of the Southwestern United States, including Phoenix. The situation in Phoenix is particularly complicated by the large number of water providers, each with its own supply portfolio, demand conditions, and conservation strategies. This paper details spatial optimization models to support water supply allocation between service provider districts, where some districts experience deficits and others experience surpluses in certain years. The approach seeks to reconcile and integrate projections derived from a complex simulation model taking into account current and future climate conditions. The formulated and applied models are designed to help better understand the expected increasingly complex interactions of providers under conditions of climate change. Preliminary results show cooperative agreements would reduce spot shortages that would occur even without climate change. In addition, they would substantially reduce deficits if climate change were to moderately reduce river flows in Phoenix’s major source regions, but have little effect under the most pessimistic scenarios because there are few surpluses available for re-allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizona Department of Administration (2011a). http://www.workforce.az.gov/census-data.aspx (Last accessed October 31, 2011).

  • Arizona Department of Administration (2011b), http://www.workforce.az.gov/population-projections.aspx (Last accessed November 1, 2011).

  • Barnett TP, Pierce DW (2008) When will Lake Mead go dry? Water Resour Res 44:W03201. doi:10.1029/2007WR006704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros MTL, Zambon RC, Barbosa PSF, Yeh WWG (2008) Planning and operation of large-scale water distribution systems with preemptive priorities. J Water Resour Plann Manag 134(3):247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker N (1995) Value of moving from central planning to a market system: lessons from the Israeli water sector. Agric Econ 12(1):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brill E, Hochman E, Zilberman D (1997) Allocation and pricing at the water district level. J Agric Econ 79(3):952–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NS, Lettenmaier DP (2007) A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1417–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NS, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Clim Chang 62:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis AW, Hawkins TW, Balling RC, Gober P (2008) Estimating future runoff levels for a semi-arid fluvial system in central Arizona, USA. Clim Res 35(3):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enke S (1951) Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: solution by electricanalogue. Econometrics 19(1):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright C, Lund JR (1991) Alternative water-district organization:screening-level analysis. J Water Resour Plann Manag 117(1):86–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido A (2000) A mathematical programming model applied to the study of water markets within the Spanish agricultural sector. Ann Oper Res 94:105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P (2006) Metropolitan Phoenix: place making and community building in the desert. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Kirkwood CW (2010) Vulnerability assessment of climate-induced water shortage in Phoenix. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21295–21299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Kirkwood CW, Balling RC, Ellis AW, Deitrick S (2010) Water planning under climatic uncertainty in Phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Wentz EA, Lant T, Tschudi MK, Kirkwood CW (2011) WaterSim: a simulation model for urban water planning in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Environ Plann B 38:197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guise JWB, Flinn JC (1970) The allocation and pricing of water in a riverbasin. Am J Agric Econ 52(3):411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinfeng W, Jilei W, Zhiyong W, Changming L, Jingjie Y (2004) An optimized spatial-temporal-sectoral allocation model for water resources. GeoJournal 59(3):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation

  • Marin CM, Smith MG (1988) Water resources assessment: a spatial equilibrium approach. Water Resour Res 24(6):793–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2007) Colorado River Basin water management: Evaluating and adjusting to hydroclimatic variability. Washington, DC: National Academies Press

  • Sampson DA, Escobar V, Tschudi MK, Lant T, Gober P (2011) A provider-based water planning and management model - WaterSim 4.0 - for the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. J Environ Manag 92:2596–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1952) Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. Am Econ Rev 42(3):283–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang H, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau N, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama T, Judge GG (1964) Spatial equilibrium and quadratic programming. J Farm Econ 46(1):67–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaux HJ, Howitt RE (1984) Managing water scarcity: an evaluation of interregional transfers. Water Resour Res 20(7):785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz EA, Gober P (2007) Determinants of small-area water consumption for the City of Phoenix, Arizona. Water Resour Manag 21:1849–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Yang ZF (2010) An interactive fuzzy satisfying approach for sustainable water management in the Yellow River Delta, China. Water Resour Manag 24(7):1273–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-0345945, Decision Center for a Desert City. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan T. Murray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, A.T., Gober, P., Anselin, L. et al. Spatial Optimization Models for Water Supply Allocation. Water Resour Manage 26, 2243–2257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0013-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0013-5

Keywords

Navigation