Date: 26 Mar 2013
Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal masses: intermediate functional and oncological outcomes at a single institution
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To review the intermediate term oncologic and functional outcomes after the surgical management of bilateral renal masses (BRM).
Materials and methods
After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, the Tulane renal surgery database (n = 890 patients) was queried for patients presenting with synchronous bilateral enhancing renal masses (n = 30 renal units). We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating oncologic and functional outcomes, specifically with respect to local recurrence and metastatic disease. We also reviewed changes in glomerular filtration rates.
Of the 30 renal units were operated on for BRM concerning for renal cell carcinoma, 25 kidneys harbored malignancy (83.3 %). The average tumor size was 3.35 cm. Treatment of each kidney was staged; average time period to treatment of contralateral side was 3.5 months. Estimated GFR (eGFR) for these same pre-operative patients was 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 25–89). The average creatinine after treatment of one kidney was available for all patients and was 1.5 (range 0.7–2.8), with an average eGFR of 51.8 (range 29–87). The average creatinine after the second operation for these same 15 patients was 1.79 (range 0.9–3.7) with an average GFR of 41.9 (range 17–78). No patient had to undergo temporary dialysis. An average change in GFR after the second, contralateral procedure on the kidney was 17.07 mg/dl. Average oncologic follow-up was 608 days. Excluding two patients who presented with metastatic disease, the average recurrence-free survival was 92.8 %.
Our data continue to underscore the need for nephron sparing surgery (NSS), especially in the setting of BRM. The average decline in GFR of 28.9 % after treatment of both kidneys and renal cell carcinoma recurrence-free rate of 92.3 % further support the efficacy of NSS in these patients.
Lowrance WT et al (2009) Developments in the surgical management of sporadic synchronous bilateral renal tumors. BJU Int 105:1093–1097
Blute M et al (2003) The effect of bilaterality, pathological features, and surgical outcome in nonhereditary renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 179:1276–1281CrossRef
Patel AR et al (2011) Bilateral synchronous tumors: pathologic concordance and clinical implications. Urology 78(5):1095–1099
Roos F et al (2011) Oncologic long-term outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma stage pT1b or greater in a matched-pair cohort. J Urol 77(4):803–808CrossRef
Boorjan SA et al (2008) The impact of temporal presentation on clinical and pathological outcomes for patients with bilateral renal masses. Eur Urol 54:855–863CrossRef
Patel N et al (2012) Active surveillance of small renal masses offers short-term oncological efficacy equivalent to radical and partial nephrectomy. BJUI 110:1270–1275CrossRef
Donine et al (2011) Tumor diameter and decreased preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate are independently correlated in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJUI 109:379–383CrossRef
Kates M et al (2011) Increased risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma less than or equal to 2 cm. J Clin Oncol, vol. 29, abstract 4589, supplement 15
- Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal masses: intermediate functional and oncological outcomes at a single institution
International Urology and Nephrology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , pp 619-625
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Nephron sparing surgery
- Bilateral renal mass
- Industry Sectors