Abstract
In this paper we aim to describe how secondary school teachers explain multicausal historical events. To that end, we recorded and analyzed seven classes on “The discovery and colonization of America”. The results show that secondary school teachers do not simply deal with history as a catalog of actions, characters and dates. On the contrary, historical contents are presented as a mesh of events and factors, explicitly or implicitly interwoven. In the discourse analysed, causal-conditional relationships are predominant, although some intentional and narrative elements are also integrated. The teachers asked some questions specifically aimed at involving students in causal reasoning. In spite of the fact that some students recalled a great deal of information, they were likely to describe the historical accounts without explaining why they were generated. Recall protocols contained many more narrative elements than causal ones. Most of the students only remembered and understood those causal relationships which had been signaled and supported verbally by teachers during the explanation. Implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistic and Education, 16, 298–318.
Ashby, R., & Lee, P. J. (1987). Children’s concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62–88). London, England: Falmer Press.
Barton, K. (1996). Narrative simplifications in elementary students’ historical thinking. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 6, pp. 51–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Braudel, F. (1968). La Historia y las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Alianza.
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., Georgi, M. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Learning from histoy texts: From causal analysis to argument models. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 47–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGrawHill.
Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history?. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Carretero, M. (2002). Construir & enseñar las Ciencias Sociales & la Historia. Buenos Aires: Aique.
Carretero, M., Jacott, L., & López-Manjón, A. (2002). Learning history through textbooks: Are Mexican and Spanish students taught the same story? Learning and Instruction, 12, 651–665.
Carretero, M., López-Manjón, A., & Jacott, L. (1997). Explaining historical events. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 245–254.
Carretero, M., & Montanero, M. (2008). Enseñanza y aprendizaje de la Historia: Aspectos cognitivos y culturales. Cultura y Educación, 20(2), 133–142.
Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Coffin, C. (2004). Learning to write story: The role of causality. Written Communication, 21, 261–289.
De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.). (1998). Historical formation. Design of vision. Brussel, Belgium: Flemish Board for CSE.
Dickinson, A. K., & Lee, P. J. (1984). Making sense of history. In A. K. Dickinson, P. J. Lee, & P. J. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history (pp. 117–153). London: Heinemann.
Dray, W. (1997). Philosophy and historiography. In M. Bentley (Ed.), Companion to historiography (pp. 746–764). London & New York: Routledge.
Duthie, J. (1986). The Web: A powerful tool for teaching and evaluation of the expository essay. The History Social Science Teacher, 21, 232–236.
Evans, R. (1989). Teachers conceptions of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 17, 210–240.
Evans, R. J. (2000). In defense of history. New York: Norton Paperback.
Grant, S. J. (2001). It’s just the fact, Or is it? The relationship between teachers’ practices and student’ understandings of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(1), 65–108.
Greene, S. (1994). The problem of learning to think like historians: Writing history en the culture of the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 29, 89–96.
Hallden, O. (1986). Learning history. Oxford Review of Education, 12, 53–66.
Hallden, O. (1998). On reasoning in history. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (Vol. 2, pp. 272–278). London: Woburn.
Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hertzberg, H. W. (1985). Students, methods, and materials of instructions. In D. Alder & M. Downey (Eds.), History is the schools (pp. 25–40). Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
Hoostein, H. (1995). Motivational strategies of middle school social studies teachers. Social Education, 59, 23–26.
Howell, M., & Prevenier, W. (2001). The nature of historical knowledge. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Lee, P. (2002). Walking backwards into tomorrow. Historical consciousness and understanding history. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, US.
Lee, P. (2004). Historical literacy: Theory and research. Paper presented at the History Education. International Research Network Conference. Ambleside, UK.
Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 233–244.
Leinhardt, G. (1993). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 46–74.
Leinhardt, G. (1997). Instructional explanations in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 221–233.
Leinhardt, G., Beck, I., & Stainton, C. (1994). Teaching and learning in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Levstik, L. (1995). Narrative construction: Cultural framework for history. Social Studies, 86, 113–116.
Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revision on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 525–556.
Masterman, L., & Sharples, M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers & Education, 38, 165–185.
McCarthy Young, K., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Wildflowers, sheep and democracy: The role of analogy in the teaching and learning of history. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history. International review of history education (pp. 154–156). London: Woburn.
McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (1994). Making sense of accounts of history: Why young students don’t and how they might. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Station (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Méndez, J. M., & Montanero, M. (2008). Hypergraphics for history teaching. Barriers for causal reasoning about history accounts. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 128–138.
Mink, L. O. (1987). Historical understanding. New York: Cornell University Press.
Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Méndez, J. M. (2008). Enseñanza de contenidos históricos mediante diagramas multicausales. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 239(1), 27–48.
Munslow, A. (2006). The routledge companion to historical studies. New York: Routledge.
Newman, F. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 41–56.
Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning. Hillsdale: LEA.
Rivière, A., Núñez, M., Barquero, B., & Fontela, F. (1998). Influence of intentional and personal factors in recalling historical texts: A developmental perspective. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (Vol. 2, pp. 214–226). London: Woburn.
Roberts, G. (Ed.). (2001). The history and narrative reader. London: Routledge.
Rosales, J., Sánchez, E., & Cañedo, I. (1998). El discurso expositivo en el aula. ¿Realmente comprenden los alumnos lo que sus profesores creen? Infancia & Aprendizaje, 81, 65–81.
Samson, C. (1987). Concepts, skills and content: A development approach to the history syllabus. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 116–141). London: Falmer.
Sánchez, E., Rosales, J., & Cañedo, I. (1999). Understanding and communication in expositive discourse: An analysis of the strategies used by expert and preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 37–58.
Seixas, P. (1993). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(3), 301–327.
Shemilt, D. (1984). Beauty and the philosopher: Empathy in history and classroom. In A. Dickinson, P. Lee, & P. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history (pp. 39–84). London: Heinemann.
Sinatra, G. M., Beck, I. L., & Mckeown, M. G. (1993). How knowledge influenced two interventions designed to improve comprehension. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 14, 141–163.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanford, M. (1998). An introduction to the philosophy of history. Malden: Blackwell.
Topolski, J. (1991). Towards and integrated model of historical explanation. History and Theory, 30, 324–338.
Topolski, J. (1992). Metodología de la Historia. Madrid: Cátedra.
Topolski, J. (2004). La estructura de las narrativas históricas y la enseñanza de la Historia. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Aprender & pensar la Historia (pp. 101–120). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110.
Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., & Van der Linden, J. L. (2006). Historical reasoning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology (pp. 265–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanSledright, B. A. (1998). Historical study, the heritage curriculum and educational research. Issues in Education, 4(2), 243–249.
VanSledright, B. A. (2004). What does it mean to think historically… and how do you teach it? Social Education, 68(3), 230–233.
VanSledright, B. A., & Frankes, L. (2000). Concept- and strategic-knowledge development in historical study: A comparative exploration in two-fourth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 239–283.
Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kenner, J., & Ney, L. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social science (pp. 403–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., & Wiley, J. (1997). Conceptual understanding in history. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 147–158.
Wilson, S. M. (2001). Research on history teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–544). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729–769.
Wineburg, S. S. (1996). The psychology of learning and teaching history. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 423–437). New York: MacMillan.
Wineburg, S. S. (2000). Making historical sense. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 306–325). New York: University Press.
Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Acknowledgments
This research was made possible by financing from the Junta of Extremadura (Consejería de Educación, Ciencia & Tecnología and the Fondo Social Europeo) in the framework of the project 2PR04AO96 of the II Plan Regional de Investigación & Desarrollo Tecnológico de Extremadura (DOE no. 30, 13 March 2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montanero, M., Lucero, M. Causal discourse and the teaching of history. How do teachers explain historical causality?. Instr Sci 39, 109–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y