Skip to main content
Log in

Causal discourse and the teaching of history. How do teachers explain historical causality?

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we aim to describe how secondary school teachers explain multicausal historical events. To that end, we recorded and analyzed seven classes on “The discovery and colonization of America”. The results show that secondary school teachers do not simply deal with history as a catalog of actions, characters and dates. On the contrary, historical contents are presented as a mesh of events and factors, explicitly or implicitly interwoven. In the discourse analysed, causal-conditional relationships are predominant, although some intentional and narrative elements are also integrated. The teachers asked some questions specifically aimed at involving students in causal reasoning. In spite of the fact that some students recalled a great deal of information, they were likely to describe the historical accounts without explaining why they were generated. Recall protocols contained many more narrative elements than causal ones. Most of the students only remembered and understood those causal relationships which had been signaled and supported verbally by teachers during the explanation. Implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistic and Education, 16, 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R., & Lee, P. J. (1987). Children’s concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62–88). London, England: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. (1996). Narrative simplifications in elementary students’ historical thinking. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 6, pp. 51–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1968). La Historia y las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., Georgi, M. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Learning from histoy texts: From causal analysis to argument models. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 47–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history?. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M. (2002). Construir & enseñar las Ciencias Sociales & la Historia. Buenos Aires: Aique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., Jacott, L., & López-Manjón, A. (2002). Learning history through textbooks: Are Mexican and Spanish students taught the same story? Learning and Instruction, 12, 651–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., López-Manjón, A., & Jacott, L. (1997). Explaining historical events. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., & Montanero, M. (2008). Enseñanza y aprendizaje de la Historia: Aspectos cognitivos y culturales. Cultura y Educación, 20(2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, C. (2004). Learning to write story: The role of causality. Written Communication, 21, 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.). (1998). Historical formation. Design of vision. Brussel, Belgium: Flemish Board for CSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. K., & Lee, P. J. (1984). Making sense of history. In A. K. Dickinson, P. J. Lee, & P. J. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history (pp. 117–153). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dray, W. (1997). Philosophy and historiography. In M. Bentley (Ed.), Companion to historiography (pp. 746–764). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duthie, J. (1986). The Web: A powerful tool for teaching and evaluation of the expository essay. The History Social Science Teacher, 21, 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1989). Teachers conceptions of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 17, 210–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. J. (2000). In defense of history. New York: Norton Paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S. J. (2001). It’s just the fact, Or is it? The relationship between teachers’ practices and student’ understandings of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(1), 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. (1994). The problem of learning to think like historians: Writing history en the culture of the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 29, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallden, O. (1986). Learning history. Oxford Review of Education, 12, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallden, O. (1998). On reasoning in history. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (Vol. 2, pp. 272–278). London: Woburn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, H. W. (1985). Students, methods, and materials of instructions. In D. Alder & M. Downey (Eds.), History is the schools (pp. 25–40). Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoostein, H. (1995). Motivational strategies of middle school social studies teachers. Social Education, 59, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, M., & Prevenier, W. (2001). The nature of historical knowledge. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. (2002). Walking backwards into tomorrow. Historical consciousness and understanding history. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, US.

  • Lee, P. (2004). Historical literacy: Theory and research. Paper presented at the History Education. International Research Network Conference. Ambleside, UK.

  • Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1993). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 46–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1997). Instructional explanations in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Beck, I., & Stainton, C. (1994). Teaching and learning in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levstik, L. (1995). Narrative construction: Cultural framework for history. Social Studies, 86, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revision on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 525–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterman, L., & Sharples, M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers & Education, 38, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy Young, K., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Wildflowers, sheep and democracy: The role of analogy in the teaching and learning of history. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history. International review of history education (pp. 154–156). London: Woburn.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (1994). Making sense of accounts of history: Why young students don’t and how they might. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Station (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, J. M., & Montanero, M. (2008). Hypergraphics for history teaching. Barriers for causal reasoning about history accounts. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, L. O. (1987). Historical understanding. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Méndez, J. M. (2008). Enseñanza de contenidos históricos mediante diagramas multicausales. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 239(1), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munslow, A. (2006). The routledge companion to historical studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning. Hillsdale: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, A., Núñez, M., Barquero, B., & Fontela, F. (1998). Influence of intentional and personal factors in recalling historical texts: A developmental perspective. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (Vol. 2, pp. 214–226). London: Woburn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (Ed.). (2001). The history and narrative reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosales, J., Sánchez, E., & Cañedo, I. (1998). El discurso expositivo en el aula. ¿Realmente comprenden los alumnos lo que sus profesores creen? Infancia & Aprendizaje, 81, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, C. (1987). Concepts, skills and content: A development approach to the history syllabus. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 116–141). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, E., Rosales, J., & Cañedo, I. (1999). Understanding and communication in expositive discourse: An analysis of the strategies used by expert and preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (1993). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(3), 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (1984). Beauty and the philosopher: Empathy in history and classroom. In A. Dickinson, P. Lee, & P. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history (pp. 39–84). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Beck, I. L., & Mckeown, M. G. (1993). How knowledge influenced two interventions designed to improve comprehension. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 14, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, M. (1998). An introduction to the philosophy of history. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topolski, J. (1991). Towards and integrated model of historical explanation. History and Theory, 30, 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topolski, J. (1992). Metodología de la Historia. Madrid: Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topolski, J. (2004). La estructura de las narrativas históricas y la enseñanza de la Historia. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Aprender & pensar la Historia (pp. 101–120). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., & Van der Linden, J. L. (2006). Historical reasoning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology (pp. 265–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. A. (1998). Historical study, the heritage curriculum and educational research. Issues in Education, 4(2), 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. A. (2004). What does it mean to think historically… and how do you teach it? Social Education, 68(3), 230–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. A., & Frankes, L. (2000). Concept- and strategic-knowledge development in historical study: A comparative exploration in two-fourth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 239–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kenner, J., & Ney, L. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social science (pp. 403–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., & Wiley, J. (1997). Conceptual understanding in history. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M. (2001). Research on history teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–544). Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (1996). The psychology of learning and teaching history. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 423–437). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (2000). Making historical sense. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 306–325). New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible by financing from the Junta of Extremadura (Consejería de Educación, Ciencia & Tecnología and the Fondo Social Europeo) in the framework of the project 2PR04AO96 of the II Plan Regional de Investigación & Desarrollo Tecnológico de Extremadura (DOE no. 30, 13 March 2004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Montanero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montanero, M., Lucero, M. Causal discourse and the teaching of history. How do teachers explain historical causality?. Instr Sci 39, 109–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y

Keywords

Navigation