Instructional Science

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 483–511

Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group Discussion


DOI: 10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4

Cite this article as:
Choi, I., Land, S.M. & Turgeon, A.J. Instr Sci (2005) 33: 483. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4


Meaningful discussion that facilitates reflective thinking can be initiated when learners raise thoughtful questions or provide critical feedback; however, generating effective questions requires a certain level of domain knowledge and metacognitive skills of the question-askers. We propose a peer-questioning scaffolding framework intended to facilitate metacognition and learning through scaffolding effective peer-questioning in online discussion. This framework assumes that novice students who lack domain and metacognitive knowledge can be scaffolded to generate meaningful interactions at an early stage of learning and the resulting peer-generated adaptive questions can facilitate learners’ metacognition. Thus, this study investigated the effects of providing online scaffolding for generating adaptive questions to peers during online small group discussion. A field experimental time-series control-group design was employed as a mixed model for the research design. Thirty-nine college students from an online introductory class on turfgrass management participated in the study. The findings revealed that the scaffolds were useful to increase the frequency of student questioning behavior during online discussion. For some students, the online guidance reportedly served as “a starting point” to generate questions when they had difficulty asking questions. However, the guidance did not improve the quality of questions and thus learning outcomes. The interview data indicated that peer-generated adaptive questions served a critical role in facilitating learner’s reflection and knowledge reconstruction. Further study should focus on the quality improvement of peer-generated questions while considering adaptive and dynamic forms of scaffolding and intermediate factors such as prior knowledge, metacognition, task complexity, and scaffolding type.

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ikseon Choi
    • 1
  • Susan M. Land
    • 2
  • Alfred J. Turgeon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional TechnologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA