Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered, Mutagenic, and Conventional Wheat Production Systems

Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties produced using modern biotechnologies, such as genetic engineering and mutagenic techniques, have lagged behind other crop species, but are now being developed and, in the case of mutagenic wheat, commercially grown around the world. Because these wheat varieties have emerged recently, there is a unique opportunity to assess comparatively the potential environmental risks (human health, ecological, and livestock risks) associated with genetically engineered, mutagenic, and conventional wheat production systems. Replacement of traditional herbicides with glyphosate in a glyphosate-tolerant (genetically engineered) wheat system or imazamox in an imidazolinone-tolerant (mutagenic) wheat system may alter environmental risks associated with weed management. Additionally, because both systems rely on plants that express novel proteins, the proteins and plants themselves may impose risks. The purpose of our study was to examine comparatively the multiple aspects of risk associated with different wheat production systems in the US and Canada using the risk assessment paradigm. Specifically, we used tier 1 quantitative and qualitative risk assessment methods to compare specific environmental risks associated with the different wheat production systems. Both glyphosate and imazamox present lower human health and ecological risks than many other herbicides associated with conventional wheat production systems evaluated in this study. The differences in risks were most pronounced when comparing glyphosate and imazamox to herbicides currently with substantial market share. Current weight-of-evidence suggests that the transgenic CP4 EPSPS protein present in glyphosate-tolerant wheat poses negligible risk to humans, livestock, and wildlife. Risk for mutated AHAS protein in imidazolinone-tolerant wheat most likely would be low, but there are not sufficient effect and exposure data to adequately characterize risk. Environmental risks for herbicides were more amenable to quantitative assessments than for the transgenic CP4 EPSPS protein and the mutated AHAS protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • J Ash C Novak S Scheideler (2003) ArticleTitleThe fate of genetically modified protein from Roundup Ready soybeans in laying hens J Appl Poult Res 12 242–245

    Google Scholar 

  • BASF (2003) Beyond Herbicide. Specimen label. NVA 2003–04-191-0049. Research Triangle Park, NC USA

  • Center for Food Safety (2003) Petition Seeking an Environmental Impact Statement Concerning the Deregulation of Genetically Engineered Wheat Varieties & Petition Seeking the Listing of Genetically Engineered Wheat Varieties as Noxious Weeds. Citizen Petition before the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Health Inspection Service. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/li/WheatUSDApetFinalD7.pdf

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency [CFIA] (2003) Decision Document DD2003-44 Determination of the Safety of BASF’s Imazamox Tolerant (ClearfieldTM) Wheat AP602CL. Nepean, Ontario

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency [CFIA] (2004) Decision Document DD2004-47 Determination of the Safety of BASF’s Imazamox Tolerant (ClearfieldTM) Wheat AP205CL. Nepean, Ontario

  • H Chang N Kim M Park S Lim S Kim J Kim et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase of glyphosate-tolerant soybean expressed in Escherichia coli shows no severe allergenicity Molecules and Cells 15 20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • A Roos ParticleDe A Blair J Rusiecki J Hoppin M Svec M Dosemeci et al. (2005) ArticleTitleCancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study Environ Health Persp 113 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • S Donkin J Velez A Totten E Stanisiewski G Hartnell (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of feeding silage and grain from glyphosate-tolerant or insect-protected corn hybrids on feed intake, ruminal digestion, and milk production in dairy cattle J␣Dairy Sci 86 1780–1788 Occurrence Handle12778588 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjslGisLk%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond B, Dudek B, Astwood J, Nemeth M, Sidhu R, Haught D, (2001) 13-week feeding study in rats fed grain from Roundup Ready corn®. Proc 2001 Soc Toxicol Annu Meet 411

  • B Hammond J Vicini G Hartnell M Naylor C Knight E Robinson et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish, and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance J Nutr 126 717–727 Occurrence Handle8598557 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhsVyktrs%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L Harrison M Bailey M Naylor J Ream B Hammond D Nida et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe expressed protein in glyphosate-tolerant soybean, 5-enolypyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase from Agrobacterium sp. Strain CP4, is rapidly digested in␣vitro and is not toxic to acutely gavaged mice J Nutr 126 728–740 Occurrence Handle8598558 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhsVyktrg%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (2004a) Imidazolinone Tolerant ClearfieldTM Wheat AP205CL. Ottawa, Ontario

  • Health Canada (2004b) Imidazolinone Tolerant ClearfieldTM Wheat AP602CL. Ottawa, Ontario

  • T Hu S Metz C Chay HP Zhou N Biest G Chen et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAgrobacterium-mediated large-scale transformation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using glyphosate selection Plant Cell Rep 21 1010–1019 Occurrence Handle12835912 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvVOqsbc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • C Kan G Hartnell (2004) ArticleTitleEvaluation of broiler performance when fed roundup-ready wheat (event MON 71800), control, and commercial wheat varieties Poultry Sci 83 1325–1333 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntFGlsr8%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Leach J, Ledesma B, Hammond B, NaylorM, Fuchs R et al. (2001) Safety assessment of MEPSPS protein in Roundup Ready corn plants. Proc Soc Toxicol Annu Meet: 411.

  • Northern Plains Resource Council (2002) Why Plant What You Can’t Sell: Protecting Montana’s Valuable Wheat from Genetic Contamination. http://www.northernplains.org

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council [NRC] (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council [NRC] (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R Peterson A Hulting (2004) ArticleTitleA comparative ecological risk assessment for herbicides used on spring wheat: the effect of glyphosate when used within a glyphosate-tolerant wheat system Weed Sci 52 834–844 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnvFegtbo%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • W Pilacinski (2002) Petition for determination of nonregulated status for Roundup Ready® wheat event MON 71800. 02-WT-093F Monsanto Company St. Louis, MO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSociety for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry [SETAC] (1994) Aquatic Dialogue Group: Pesticide Risk Assessment and Mitigation Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education Pensacola, FL 220

    Google Scholar 

  • R Sidhu B Hammond R Fuchs J-N Mutz L Holden B George T Olson (2000) ArticleTitleGlyphosate-tolerant corn: the composition and feeding value of grain from glyphosate-tolerant corn is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.) J Agric Food Chem 48 2305–2312 Occurrence Handle10.1021/jf000172f Occurrence Handle10888542 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjsFOrtL4%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • K Stanford J Aalhus M Dugan G Wallins R Sharma T McAllister (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of feeding transgenic canola on apparent digestibility, growth performance and carcass characteristics of lambs Can J Anim Sci 83 299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • M Taylor E Stanisiewski S Riordan M Nemeth B George G Hartnell (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of broiler performance when feds diets containing Roundup Ready (Event RT73), nontransgenic control, or commercial canola meal Poultry Sci 83 456–461 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ls1agsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA] (2003) Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2002 Field Crops Summary National Agricultural Statistics Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1993) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Glyphosate. EPA 738-R-93-014. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1996) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Trifluralin. EPA 738-R-95-040. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1998a) The Pesticide Handler Exposure Database PHED v. 1.1, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1998b) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Bromoxynil. EPA 738-R-98-013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1999) ECOFRAM Terrestrial Draft Report. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods. EPA/OPP/EFED. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2001) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Triallate. EPA 738-R-00-021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2005a) 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (CASRN 94-75-7). Last revised: May 5, 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2005b) 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) (CASRN 94-74-6). Last revised: January 1, 1991. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (1995a) Clopyralid; Pesticide Tolerance. December 13, 1995, Fed. Reg. 60(239):63956–63958. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (1995b) Triasulfuron; Pesticide Tolerances. July 18, 1995, Fed. Reg. 60(137):36729–36731. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (1996) Pesticide Tolerance for Tribenuron Methyl. April 3, 1996, Fed. Reg. 61(65):14637–14639. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (1998) Fenoxaprop-ethyl; Pesticide Tolerance. April 22, 1998, Fed. Reg. 63(77):19829–19837. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (1999) Dicamba (3,6-dichloro- o-anisic acid); Pesticide Tolerance. January 6, 1999, Fed. Reg. 64(31):759–769. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2000a) Clodinafop-propargyl; Pesticide Tolerance. June 22, 2000, Fed. Reg. 65(121):38765–38774. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2000b) Flucarbazone-sodium; Pesticide Tolerance. September 29, 2000, Fed. Reg. 65(190):58364–58375. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2002) Metsulfuron-methyl; Pesticide Tolerance. August 7, 2002, Fed. Reg. 67(152):51088–51097. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2003a) Imazamox; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance. February 14, 2003, Fed. Reg. 68(31):7428–7433. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2003b) Tralkoxydim; Time-Limited Pesticide Tolerance. August 13, 2003, Fed. Reg. 68(156):48299–48302. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Federal Register [USFR] (2004) Thifensulfuron methyl; Pesticide Tolerance. September 17, 2004, Fed. Reg. 69(180):55975–55982. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • G Williams R Kroes I Munro (2000) ArticleTitleSafety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans Reg Tox Pharm 31 117–165 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktVOntbY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1006/rtph.1999.1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • F Whitford J Kronenberg C Lunchick J Driver R Tomerlin J Wolt et al. (1999) Pesticides and Human Health Risk Assessment: Policies, Processes, and Procedures PPP-48. Purdue Pesticide Programs Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J Wolt R Peterson Bystrak T Meade (2003) ArticleTitleA screening level approach for non-target insect risk assessment: transgenic Btcorn pollen and the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) Environ Entomol 32 237–246 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjslCkurk%3D Occurrence Handle10.1603/0046-225X-32.2.237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J Wolt R Peterson (2000) ArticleTitleAgricultural biotechnology and societal decision-making: the role of risk analysis AgBioForum 3 291–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert K.D. Peterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, R.K., Shama, L.M. A Comparative Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered, Mutagenic, and Conventional Wheat Production Systems. Transgenic Res 14, 859–875 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-005-1411-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-005-1411-8

Key words

Navigation