Strategies of model-building in condensed matter physics: trade-offs as a demarcation criterion between physics and biology?
- Axel Gelfert
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper contrasts and compares strategies of model-building in condensed matter physics and biology, with respect to their alleged unequal susceptibility to trade-offs between different theoretical desiderata. It challenges the view, often expressed in the philosophical literature on trade-offs in population biology, that the existence of systematic trade-offs is a feature that is specific to biological models, since unlike physics, biology studies evolved systems that exhibit considerable natural variability. By contrast, I argue that the development of ever more sophisticated experimental, theoretical, and computational methods in physics is beginning to erode this contrast, since condensed matter physics is now in a position to measure, describe, model, and manipulate sample-specific features of individual systems—for example at the mesoscopic level—in a way that accounts for their contingency and heterogeneity. Model-building in certain areas of physics thus turns out to be more akin to modeling in biology than has been supposed and, indeed, has traditionally been the case.
- Strategies of model-building in condensed matter physics: trade-offs as a demarcation criterion between physics and biology?
Volume 190, Issue 2 , pp 253-272
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Scientific models
- Mesoscopic models
- Industry Sectors
- Axel Gelfert (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, 3 Arts Link, Singapore, 117570, Republic of Singapore