, Volume 190, Issue 15, pp 3175-3184

First online:

Inconsistency in natural languages

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


An argument for Trivialism, the view that natural languages are logically inconsistent, is provided that does not rely on contentious empirical assumptions about natural language terms such as “and” or “or.” Further, the view is defended against an important objection recently mounted against it by Thomas Hofweber.


Trivialism Inconsistency Regimentation Curry’s paradox