Synthese

, Volume 190, Issue 14, pp 2835–2851

Concessive knowledge-attributions: fallibilism and gradualism

Authors

    • University of New South Wales
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0088-9

Cite this article as:
Hetherington, S. Synthese (2013) 190: 2835. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0088-9

Abstract

Any knowledge-fallibilist needs to solve the conceptual problem posed by concessive knowledge-attributions (such as ‘I know that p, but possibly not-p’). These seem to challenge the coherence of knowledge-fallibilism. This paper defuses that challenge via a gradualist refinement of what Fantl and McGrath (2009) call weak epistemic fallibilism.

Keywords

Fallibilism Knowledge Concessive knowledge-attribution Jeremy Fantl Matthew McGrath Gradualism

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012