Inference to the best explanation: does it track truth?
- David H. Glass
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the form of inference known as inference to the best explanation there are various ways to characterise what is meant by the best explanation. This paper considers a number of such characterisations including several based on confirmation measures and several based on coherence measures. The goal is to find a measure which adequately captures what is meant by ‘best’ and which also yields the truth with a high degree of probability. Computer simulations are used to show that the overlap coherence measure achieves this goal, enabling the true explanation to be identified almost as often as an approach which simply selects the most probable explanation. Further advantages to this approach are also considered in the case where there is uncertainty in the prior probability distribution.
- Angere S. (2007) The defeasible nature of coherentist justification. Synthese 157: 321–335 CrossRef
- Angere S. (2008) Coherence as a heuristic. Mind 117(465): 1–26 CrossRef
- Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2003) Bayesian epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Chajewska, U., & Halpern, J. Y. (1997). Defining explanation in probabilistic systems. In Proceedings of the 13th conference on uncertainty in AI (pp. 62–71).
- Douven I. (1999) Inference to the best explanation made coherent. Philosophy of Science 66: S424–S435 CrossRef
- Fitelson B. (1999) The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philosophy of Science 66: S362–S378 CrossRef
- Fitelson B. (2003) A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis 63: 194–199 CrossRef
- Glass, D. H. (2002). Coherence, explanation and Bayesian networks. In M. O’Neill et al. (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2464, pp. 177–182). Berlin: Springer.
- Glass D. H. (2007) Coherence measures and inference to the best explanation. Synthese 157: 275–296 CrossRef
- Lipton P. (2004) Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). Routledge, London
- McGrew T. (2003) Confirmation, heuristics and explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 553–567 CrossRef
- Okasha S. (2000) Van Fraassen’s critique of inference to the best explanation. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Science 31: 691–710 CrossRef
- Olsson E. J. (2002) What is the problem of coherence and truth? Journal of Philosophy 99: 246–272 CrossRef
- Olsson E. J. (2005) Against coherence. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRef
- Psillos, S. (2004). Inference to the best explanation and Bayesianism. In F. Stadler (Ed.), Institute of Vienna circle yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 83–91). London: Kluwer.
- Shogenji T. (1999) Is coherence truth-conducive? Analysis 59: 338–345 CrossRef
- Treagar M. (2004) Using explanatory factors in induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 505–519 CrossRef
- van Fraassen B. C. (1989) Laws and symmetry. Clarendon Press, Oxford CrossRef
- Weisberg J. (2009) Locating IBE in the Bayesian framework. Synthese 167: 125–143 CrossRef
- Inference to the best explanation: does it track truth?
Volume 185, Issue 3 , pp 411-427
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- David H. Glass (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, UK