Abstract
Why is the academy in general, and philosophy in particular, not more involved in the fight against the creationist threat? And why, when a response is offered, is it so curiously ineffective? I argue, by using an analogy with the battle against the Black Knight from the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, that the difficulty lies largely in a failure to see the nature of the problem clearly. By modifying the analogy, it is possible to see both why large sections of the academy have remained unmoved and also why many of the reactions to the threat have been so unsuccessful. Finally, I offer some very broad suggestions as to how to modify our approach in light of this new perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chapman, G., Cleese, J., Idle, E., & Jones, T. (1975). Monty python and the holy grail.
Harris Poll # 52. (2005). Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults believe human beings were created by god. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from Harris Interactive ebsite:http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=581.
Kitcher P. (1983) Abusing science: The case against creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pennock R.T. (2000) Tower of Babel: The evidence against the new creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pennock R.T. (2001) Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge
Ruse M. (2005) The evolution-creation struggle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Scott, E. C. (2000). The creation/evolution continuum. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from The National Center for Science Education website:http://ncseweb.org/creationism/general/creationevolution-continuum.
Smith K.C. (2001a) Appealing to ignorance behind the cloak of ambiguity. In: Pennock R. (eds) Intelligent design, creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 705–736
Smith K.C. (2001) Can intelligent design become respectable?. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 20(4): 40–43
Sober E. (2000) Philosophy of biology (2nd ed.). Westview Press, Boulder, Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K.C. Foiling the Black Knight. Synthese 178, 219–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9545-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9545-5