Three-valued Logics in Modal Logic
Every truth-functional three-valued propositional logic can be conservatively translated into the modal logic S5. We prove this claim constructively in two steps. First, we define a Translation Manual that converts any propositional formula of any three-valued logic into a modal formula. Second, we show that for every S5-model there is an equivalent three-valued valuation and vice versa. In general, our Translation Manual gives rise to translations that are exponentially longer than their originals. This fact raises the question whether there are three-valued logics for which there is a shorter translation into S5. The answer is affirmative: we present an elegant linear translation of the Logic of Paradox and of Strong Three-valued Logic into S5.
- Batens, D., On some remarkable relations between paraconsistent logics, modal logics, and ambiguity logics, in W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, and I. M. L. D’Ottaviano (eds.), Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 275–293.
- Brown, B. (1999) Yes, Virginia, there really are paraconsistent logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28: pp. 489-500 CrossRef
- Bush, D., Sequent formalizations of three-valued logic, in P. Doherty (ed.), Partiality, Modality and Nonmonotonicity, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996, pp. 45–75.
- Cadoli, M., Schaerf, M. (1996) On the complexity of entailment in propositional multivalued logics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 18: pp. 29-50 CrossRef
- Chellas, B.F. (1980) Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., Rooij, R. (2012) Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41: pp. 347-385 CrossRef
- D’Ottaviano, I. M. L., and H. A. Feitosa, On Gödel’s modal interpretation of the intuitionistic logic, in J.-Y. Béziau (ed.), Universal Logic: An Anthology, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2012, pp. 71–88.
- Feitosa, H.A., D’Ottaviano, I.M.L. (2001) Conservative translations. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 108: pp. 205-227 CrossRef
- Gödel, K., Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls, Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 4:39–40, 1933. Reprinted in K. Gödel, Collected Works, Volume 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986, pp. 300–302.
- Kleene, S.C. (1938) On notation for ordinal numbers. Journal of Symbolic Logic 3: pp. 150-155 CrossRef
- Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics, P. Noordhoff N.V., Groningen, 1952.
- Ladner, R.E. (1977) The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM Journal on Computing 6: pp. 467-480 CrossRef
- Lewis, D., Logic for equivocators, Noûs 16:431–441, 1982. Reprinted with corrections in D. Lewis, Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 97–110.
- Priest, G. (1979) The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: pp. 219-241 CrossRef
- Priest, G. (1990) Boolean negation and all that. Journal of Philosophical Logic 19: pp. 201-215 CrossRef
- Benthem, J. (1986) Partiality and nonmonotonicity in classical logic. Logique et Analyse 29: pp. 225-247
- Three-valued Logics in Modal Logic
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 101, Issue 5 , pp 1061-1072
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Three-valued logic
- Modal logic
- Conservative translations