Studia Logica

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 67–84

Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11225-008-9101-1

Cite this article as:
van Benthem, J. Stud Logica (2008) 88: 67. doi:10.1007/s11225-008-9101-1

Abstract

Modern logic is undergoing a cognitive turn, side-stepping Frege’s ‘antipsychologism’. Collaborations between logicians and colleagues in more empirical fields are growing, especially in research on reasoning and information update by intelligent agents. We place this border-crossing research in the context of long-standing contacts between logic and empirical facts, since pure normativity has never been a plausible stance. We also discuss what the fall of Frege’s Wall means for a new agenda of logic as a theory of rational agency, and what might then be a viable understanding of ‘psychologism’ as a friend rather than an enemy of logical theory.

Keywords

PsychologismPsychology of reasoningDynamic logicInteractionSelf-correctionCognitive science

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ILLCUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands