Studia Logica

, 88:3

Is Logic all in our Heads? From Naturalism to Psychologism

  • Francis J. Pelletier
  • Renée Elio
  • Philip Hanson
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11225-008-9098-5

Cite this article as:
Pelletier, F.J., Elio, R. & Hanson, P. Stud Logica (2008) 88: 3. doi:10.1007/s11225-008-9098-5
  • 248 Downloads

Abstract

Psychologism in logic is the doctrine that the semantic content of logical terms is in some way a feature of human psychology. We consider the historically influential version of the doctrine, Psychological Individualism, and the many counter-arguments to it. We then propose and assess various modifications to the doctrine that might allow it to avoid the classical objections. We call these Psychological Descriptivism, Teleological Cognitive Architecture, and Ideal Cognizers. These characterizations give some order to the wide range of modern views that are seen as psychologistic because of one or another feature. Although these can avoid some of the classic objections to psychologism, some still hold.

Keywords

psychologismcognitive scienceartificial intelligencenaturalismMillFregeHusserlQuine

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis J. Pelletier
    • 1
  • Renée Elio
    • 2
  • Philip Hanson
    • 3
  1. 1.Departments of Philosophy and LinguisticsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada