Studia Logica

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 393–430

Nelson's Negation on the Base of Weaker Versions of Intuitionistic Negation


    • Department of Mathematical Logic with Laboratory for Applied Logic Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceSofia University

DOI: 10.1007/s11225-005-8476-5

Cite this article as:
Vakarelov, D. Stud Logica (2005) 80: 393. doi:10.1007/s11225-005-8476-5


Constructive logic with Nelson negation is an extension of the intuitionistic logic with a special type of negation expressing some features of constructive falsity and refutation by counterexample. In this paper we generalize this logic weakening maximally the underlying intuitionistic negation. The resulting system, called subminimal logic with Nelson negation, is studied by means of a kind of algebras called generalized N-lattices. We show that generalized N-lattices admit representation formalizing the intuitive idea of refutation by means of counterexamples giving in this way a counterexample semantics of the logic in question and some of its natural extensions. Among the extensions which are near to the intuitionistic logic are the minimal logic with Nelson negation which is an extension of the Johansson's minimal logic with Nelson negation and its in a sense dual version — the co-minimal logic with Nelson negation. Among the extensions near to the classical logic are the well known 3-valued logic of Lukasiewicz, two 12-valued logics and one 48-valued logic. Standard questions for all these logics — decidability, Kripke-style semantics, complete axiomatizability, conservativeness are studied. At the end of the paper extensions based on a new connective of self-dual conjunction and an analog of the Lukasiewicz middle value ½ have also been considered.


Nelson negationsubminimal logiccounterexample semanticsmany-valued logics

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005